{"title":"Dealing with 'Difficulty' in Comedies of Love: Arthur Schnitzler's Komödie der Verführung and Hugo von Hofmannsthal's Der Schwierige","authors":"W. Lukas","doi":"10.5699/austrianstudies.27.2019.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The early 1920s saw the publication of two new — and significant — late plays by Schnitzler and Hofmannsthal respectively. Using a problematic ('difficult') male character, they stage a conflict of love and marriage that is also situated in the historical context of the First World War. The two plays may appear to be very different on the surface — an optimistic outcome with a successful marriage in the case of Hofmannsthal, a pessimistic outcome with a deadly end in Schnitzler — but closer analysis shows that they represent two complementary variants of a solution within the overarching epochal problem of setting limits to unleashed individuality and instinctual nature. In Schnitzler's case, the article also takes a look at a fascinating textual genesis that extends over thirty years.","PeriodicalId":41034,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"29 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5699/austrianstudies.27.2019.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:The early 1920s saw the publication of two new — and significant — late plays by Schnitzler and Hofmannsthal respectively. Using a problematic ('difficult') male character, they stage a conflict of love and marriage that is also situated in the historical context of the First World War. The two plays may appear to be very different on the surface — an optimistic outcome with a successful marriage in the case of Hofmannsthal, a pessimistic outcome with a deadly end in Schnitzler — but closer analysis shows that they represent two complementary variants of a solution within the overarching epochal problem of setting limits to unleashed individuality and instinctual nature. In Schnitzler's case, the article also takes a look at a fascinating textual genesis that extends over thirty years.