Checklists for Interpreting Chest Radiographs: A Scoping Review

Q3 Nursing

Journal of Radiology Nursing Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jradnu.2023.07.008

Khethiwe Margaret Sethole MDRad , Nombeko Mshunqane PhD , Kuhlula Maluleke MSc , Mable Kekana PhD , Linda Mbonambi

{"title":"Checklists for Interpreting Chest Radiographs: A Scoping Review","authors":"Khethiwe Margaret Sethole MDRad , Nombeko Mshunqane PhD , Kuhlula Maluleke MSc , Mable Kekana PhD , Linda Mbonambi","doi":"10.1016/j.jradnu.2023.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Checklists reduce time to comprehensive radiographic reports, improve quality and consistency of abnormality detection on chest radiographs.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The aim of this review was to examine and survey the scope of published research on checklists for the interpretation of chest radiographs.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a search of CINAHL<span>, Scopus, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, ProQuest, and gray literature using search terms: chest radiographs, checklist, and image interpretation. Data were extracted from 16 articles. Data was analyzed numerically and thematically.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The selected studies were conducted in the United States (37.5%), the United Kingdom (25%), Australia (12%), South Africa (12%), Turkey (6%), and Israel (6%). The codes were grouped into five categories related to the use of checklists, in chest interpretation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the selected studies, reports showed that there was no checklist for chest interpretation in South Africa and no evidence supporting checklists as an interprofessional communication tool for chest interpretation. The authors of this study recommended a chest interpretation checklist should be developed for use by health care professionals practicing in resource-limited settings where radiologists are not on site.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiology Nursing","volume":"42 4","pages":"Pages 470-476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546084323001116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Checklists reduce time to comprehensive radiographic reports, improve quality and consistency of abnormality detection on chest radiographs.

Aim

The aim of this review was to examine and survey the scope of published research on checklists for the interpretation of chest radiographs.

Method

We conducted a search of CINAHL, Scopus, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, ProQuest, and gray literature using search terms: chest radiographs, checklist, and image interpretation. Data were extracted from 16 articles. Data was analyzed numerically and thematically.

Results

The selected studies were conducted in the United States (37.5%), the United Kingdom (25%), Australia (12%), South Africa (12%), Turkey (6%), and Israel (6%). The codes were grouped into five categories related to the use of checklists, in chest interpretation.

Conclusion

In the selected studies, reports showed that there was no checklist for chest interpretation in South Africa and no evidence supporting checklists as an interprofessional communication tool for chest interpretation. The authors of this study recommended a chest interpretation checklist should be developed for use by health care professionals practicing in resource-limited settings where radiologists are not on site.

查看原文本刊更多论文

解读胸片检查表:范围审查

导言核对表可缩短综合放射报告的时间，提高胸片异常检测的质量和一致性。方法我们使用检索词：胸片、核对表和图像解读对 CINAHL、Scopus、Medline Ovid、Web of Science、ProQuest 和灰色文献进行了检索。从 16 篇文章中提取了数据。结果所选研究分别在美国（37.5%）、英国（25%）、澳大利亚（12%）、南非（12%）、土耳其（6%）和以色列（6%）进行。结论在所选研究中，报告显示南非没有胸部解说核对表，也没有证据支持将核对表作为胸部解说的专业间交流工具。本研究的作者建议开发胸部解读核对表，供在放射科医生不在现场、资源有限的环境中执业的医护人员使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Radiology Nursing Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Radiology Nursing promotes the highest quality patient care in the diagnostic and therapeutic imaging environments. The content is intended to show radiology nurses how to practice with compassion, competence, and commitment, not only to patients but also to the profession of nursing as a whole. The journal goals mirror those of the Association for Radiologic & Imaging Nursing: to provide, promote, maintain , and continuously improve patient care through education, standards, professional growth, and collaboration with other health care provides.