Development of Non-Litigation Civil Dispute Settlement Model Based on Madurese Local Wisdom to Reduce Cases Accumulation in Court

U. Hasanah, M. A. Hamzah, Indien Winarwati
{"title":"Development of Non-Litigation Civil Dispute Settlement Model Based on Madurese Local Wisdom to Reduce Cases Accumulation in Court","authors":"U. Hasanah, M. A. Hamzah, Indien Winarwati","doi":"10.21776/UB.BLJ.2019.006.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can be used as an option for parties who conduct commercial transactions. This research is crucial to analyse what is the best dispute method  for parties to be able to resolve their commercial business disputes. It is argued that the most important of ADR is the efficiency and effectivines in relation to the enforcement of a judgement on the commercial dispute especially foreign arbitral award. This research also seeks to analyse strengths and weaknesses of each ADR method because it is very important to know in resolving disputes in the field of trade and also related to the implementation of decisions, especially in foreign arbitral award and how to improve decisions and applied in Indonesia in relation to commercial dispute. The research method used in this research is normative juridical consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, which were collected by conducting a literature review and interview technique and then processed qualitatively according to the problems and the theoretical framework logically and systematically to achieve the objective of this research, namely finding the best alternative dispute resolution in commercial dispute resolution in business transactions. This paper argued that while each of ADR method has their own strengths and weaknesses, business actors mostly prefer too have arbitration method as their ADR method in solving their disputes. However,the applying mechanism of foreign arbitration awards need further attention from Indonesian government.","PeriodicalId":31451,"journal":{"name":"Brawijaya Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brawijaya Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/UB.BLJ.2019.006.01.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can be used as an option for parties who conduct commercial transactions. This research is crucial to analyse what is the best dispute method  for parties to be able to resolve their commercial business disputes. It is argued that the most important of ADR is the efficiency and effectivines in relation to the enforcement of a judgement on the commercial dispute especially foreign arbitral award. This research also seeks to analyse strengths and weaknesses of each ADR method because it is very important to know in resolving disputes in the field of trade and also related to the implementation of decisions, especially in foreign arbitral award and how to improve decisions and applied in Indonesia in relation to commercial dispute. The research method used in this research is normative juridical consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, which were collected by conducting a literature review and interview technique and then processed qualitatively according to the problems and the theoretical framework logically and systematically to achieve the objective of this research, namely finding the best alternative dispute resolution in commercial dispute resolution in business transactions. This paper argued that while each of ADR method has their own strengths and weaknesses, business actors mostly prefer too have arbitration method as their ADR method in solving their disputes. However,the applying mechanism of foreign arbitration awards need further attention from Indonesian government.
基于马杜罗地方智慧的民事非诉纠纷解决模式的发展减少法院案件积累
仲裁和其他替代性争议解决(ADR)可以作为进行商业交易的当事人的一种选择。这项研究对于分析当事人能够解决其商业纠纷的最佳争议方法至关重要。本文认为,ADR最重要的是商事纠纷特别是涉外仲裁裁决的执行效率和效力。本研究还试图分析每个ADR方法的优点和缺点,因为它是非常重要的,要知道在解决贸易领域的纠纷,也涉及到执行的决定,特别是在外国仲裁裁决,以及如何改善决定,并适用于印度尼西亚有关商业纠纷。本研究采用的研究方法是由一级、二级和三级法律资料组成的规范法学,通过文献综述和访谈技术收集法律资料,然后根据问题和理论框架进行逻辑系统的定性处理,以达到本研究的目的,即在商业交易中的商业纠纷解决中寻找最佳的替代性争议解决方案。本文认为,虽然每一种ADR方式都有各自的优缺点,但商业行为者大多倾向于将仲裁方式作为其解决纠纷的ADR方式。然而,外国仲裁裁决的适用机制需要印尼政府进一步关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信