Peer Reviewed Articles: ‘Behind the One-Way Mirror: Reviewing the Legality of EU Tax Algorithmic Governance’

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
EC Tax Review Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2022019
David Hadwick
{"title":"Peer Reviewed Articles: ‘Behind the One-Way Mirror: Reviewing the Legality of EU Tax Algorithmic Governance’","authors":"David Hadwick","doi":"10.54648/ecta2022019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax algorithmic governance has surged from a handful of Member States a decade ago, to a majority of tax administrations in the European Union (EU) integrating artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In light of the ever-increasing volume of tax returns and tax documentation to be processed, the digital transformation of the administration has become an imperative. Yet, cases such as system risico indicatie (SyRI), the toeslagenaffaire and eKasa show that automation poses risks to taxpayers. These cases cast doubts on the secretive nature of the tax administration’s prerogatives and the information and communications technology (ICT) tools used to perform its missions, begging the question of what lies behind the administrations’ one-way mirror. Section 2 presents the current state of use of AI tax systems on the basis of a synthesized literature review of publicly available data, mapping how many and what EU States have integrated AI systems. Section 3 examines compliance of the AI systems identified with the principle of legality. This research finds that while EU Member States have heavily invested into the integration of AI tax systems, very few have adopted specific norms to mitigate the risks to taxpayers’ fundamental rights. As a result, tax algorithmic governance is creating a noticeable gap in the protection of taxpayers’ rights.\nFiscal algorithmic governance, taxpayers’ rights, artificial intelligence, tax secrecy, digital constitutionalism","PeriodicalId":43686,"journal":{"name":"EC Tax Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EC Tax Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2022019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tax algorithmic governance has surged from a handful of Member States a decade ago, to a majority of tax administrations in the European Union (EU) integrating artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In light of the ever-increasing volume of tax returns and tax documentation to be processed, the digital transformation of the administration has become an imperative. Yet, cases such as system risico indicatie (SyRI), the toeslagenaffaire and eKasa show that automation poses risks to taxpayers. These cases cast doubts on the secretive nature of the tax administration’s prerogatives and the information and communications technology (ICT) tools used to perform its missions, begging the question of what lies behind the administrations’ one-way mirror. Section 2 presents the current state of use of AI tax systems on the basis of a synthesized literature review of publicly available data, mapping how many and what EU States have integrated AI systems. Section 3 examines compliance of the AI systems identified with the principle of legality. This research finds that while EU Member States have heavily invested into the integration of AI tax systems, very few have adopted specific norms to mitigate the risks to taxpayers’ fundamental rights. As a result, tax algorithmic governance is creating a noticeable gap in the protection of taxpayers’ rights. Fiscal algorithmic governance, taxpayers’ rights, artificial intelligence, tax secrecy, digital constitutionalism
同行评议文章:“单向镜子背后:回顾欧盟税收算法治理的合法性”
税收算法治理已经从十年前的少数几个成员国激增到欧盟(EU)的大多数税务管理机构集成了人工智能(AI)系统。鉴于需要处理的纳税申报单和税务文件数量不断增加,行政部门的数字化转型势在必行。然而,系统风险指标(SyRI)、toeslagenafaire和eKasa等案例表明,自动化给纳税人带来了风险。这些案件使人们对税务局特权的秘密性质以及用于执行其任务的信息和通信技术工具产生了怀疑,从而引出了税务局单向镜背后的问题。第2节在对公开数据进行综合文献综述的基础上,介绍了人工智能税收系统的使用现状,绘制了有多少欧盟国家和哪些欧盟国家集成了人工智能系统。第3节审查了符合合法性原则的人工智能系统的合规性。这项研究发现,尽管欧盟成员国在人工智能税收系统的整合方面投入了大量资金,但很少有国家采取具体规范来减轻纳税人基本权利的风险。因此,税收算法治理在保护纳税人权利方面造成了明显的差距。财政算法治理、纳税人权利、人工智能、税务保密、数字宪政
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信