The foreign and the out-of-place in Melbourne’s early modern collections

IF 0.1 0 ART
A. Dunlop, Cordelia Warr
{"title":"The foreign and the out-of-place in Melbourne’s early modern collections","authors":"A. Dunlop, Cordelia Warr","doi":"10.1080/14434318.2022.2073974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essays in this issue take eleven objects in Melbourne collections to examine the concepts of foreignness and the out-of-place in the early modern world. The objects were made over a span of almost four centuries, from the 1400s into the 1700s, and in regions as far apart as England and the Philippines. They include manuscripts and sculptures, textiles, drawings, and prints. Some were made as art-works, while others began as practical objects with a specific use. The research presented here developed from a joint project between the Universities of Manchester and Melbourne, titled ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ and focused on the early-modern art collections in both cities. ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ began in 2017, and brought together scholars and curators from all over Australia and the United Kingdom to explore ideas of foreignness, exteriority, exclusion, and distance as manifested in early-modern art and culture. To date there have been two major outcomes from this work: the online exhibition ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ which presents objects from both cities (https://connectingcollections-manmel.com/) and a 2019 special issue of the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library (vol. 95, no. 2) with extended essays on objects in Manchester collections. The research essays presented here focus on Melbourne collections and are the final part of our project work. As we noted in the introduction to the 2019 volume, we chose ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ as a research theme both for its current and its early-modern importance. 1 Notions of the foreign and out-of-place are radically historically and socially contingent: they are shaped by contextual expectations of correct placement, appearance, or behaviour, and subtended by real or perceived exception to prevailing norms or conventions. As our research began, uncertainties associated with Brexit, the status of U.K. and Australian nationals identified as terrorists, and the Australian policy of off-shore refugee imprisonment were placing ideas about ‘ foreign ’ status and citizenship into sharp focus. As our work advanced, the protests in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis on 25 May 2020 and the Black Lives Matter movement brought debates about inclusivity and structural violence to the fore, and the ways in which these issues can (and","PeriodicalId":29864,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14434318.2022.2073974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The essays in this issue take eleven objects in Melbourne collections to examine the concepts of foreignness and the out-of-place in the early modern world. The objects were made over a span of almost four centuries, from the 1400s into the 1700s, and in regions as far apart as England and the Philippines. They include manuscripts and sculptures, textiles, drawings, and prints. Some were made as art-works, while others began as practical objects with a specific use. The research presented here developed from a joint project between the Universities of Manchester and Melbourne, titled ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ and focused on the early-modern art collections in both cities. ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ began in 2017, and brought together scholars and curators from all over Australia and the United Kingdom to explore ideas of foreignness, exteriority, exclusion, and distance as manifested in early-modern art and culture. To date there have been two major outcomes from this work: the online exhibition ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ which presents objects from both cities (https://connectingcollections-manmel.com/) and a 2019 special issue of the Bulletin of the John Rylands Library (vol. 95, no. 2) with extended essays on objects in Manchester collections. The research essays presented here focus on Melbourne collections and are the final part of our project work. As we noted in the introduction to the 2019 volume, we chose ‘ Foreign Bodies ’ as a research theme both for its current and its early-modern importance. 1 Notions of the foreign and out-of-place are radically historically and socially contingent: they are shaped by contextual expectations of correct placement, appearance, or behaviour, and subtended by real or perceived exception to prevailing norms or conventions. As our research began, uncertainties associated with Brexit, the status of U.K. and Australian nationals identified as terrorists, and the Australian policy of off-shore refugee imprisonment were placing ideas about ‘ foreign ’ status and citizenship into sharp focus. As our work advanced, the protests in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis on 25 May 2020 and the Black Lives Matter movement brought debates about inclusivity and structural violence to the fore, and the ways in which these issues can (and
墨尔本早期现代收藏品中的外来和不合时宜
本期的文章选取了墨尔本收藏的十一件物品,来考察现代早期世界中的外来和不合时宜的概念。这些物品的制作时间跨度近四个世纪,从14世纪到18世纪,远至英国和菲律宾。它们包括手稿和雕塑、纺织品、绘画和版画。有些是作为艺术作品制作的,而另一些则是作为具有特定用途的实用物品开始的。这里介绍的研究源于曼彻斯特大学和墨尔本大学的一个名为“异物”的联合项目,重点关注这两个城市的早期现代艺术收藏《异物》始于2017年,汇集了来自澳大利亚和英国的学者和策展人,探索早期现代艺术和文化中表现出的异国、外在、排斥和距离的思想。到目前为止,这项工作有两个主要成果:在线展览“异物”,展示了来自两个城市的物体(https://connectingcollections-manmel.com/)以及《约翰·赖兰德图书馆公报》2019年特刊(第95卷,第2期),其中收录了关于曼彻斯特藏品的扩展文章。这里介绍的研究论文专注于墨尔本的收藏,是我们项目工作的最后一部分。正如我们在2019年卷的引言中所指出的,我们选择“异物”作为研究主题,既考虑到其当前的重要性,也考虑到其早期的现代重要性。1外来和不合时宜的概念在历史和社会上具有根本的偶然性:它们是由对正确位置、外表或行为的情境期望所塑造的,并由对现行规范或惯例的真实或感知的例外所涵盖。随着我们的研究开始,与英国脱欧、被认定为恐怖分子的英国和澳大利亚国民的身份以及澳大利亚的离岸难民监禁政策相关的不确定性,使关于“外国”身份和公民身份的想法成为焦点。随着我们工作的推进,2020年5月25日乔治·弗洛伊德在明尼阿波利斯被谋杀后的抗议活动和“黑人的命也是命”运动将关于包容性和结构性暴力的辩论带到了前台,以及这些问题可以(和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信