THE POSITION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 5 OF 2019 REGARDING GUIDELINES FOR ADDITIONING APPLICATIONS FOR MARRIAGE DISPENSATION POST THE REVISION OF THE MARRIAGE LAW

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.26532/jph.v9i3.27683

Ni Nyoman Adi Astiti, Jefry Tarantang

{"title":"THE POSITION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION NUMBER 5 OF 2019 REGARDING GUIDELINES FOR ADDITIONING APPLICATIONS FOR MARRIAGE DISPENSATION POST THE REVISION OF THE MARRIAGE LAW","authors":"Ni Nyoman Adi Astiti, Jefry Tarantang","doi":"10.26532/jph.v9i3.27683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The birth of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Trialing Applications for Dispensation of Marriage is certainly a legal instrument as a means of achieving justice, certainty and benefits for justice seekers, especially as a condition for marriage under the minimum age limit for marriage after the revision of the marriage law. The purpose of this study is to examine the position of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Trialing Applications for Dispensation of Marriage. This research uses normative method. The background findings of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Trying Marriage Dispensation Applications to complete the legal vacuum after the revision of the Marriage Law in providing a legal umbrella for the process of adjudicating applications for marriage dispensation which so far have not been clearly regulated in laws and regulations. Position of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 Regarding Guidelines for Adjudicating Applications for Marriage Dispensation, judges must ensure that children's statements are heard in court as an effort to prevent violations of children's rights.","PeriodicalId":34168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i3.27683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The birth of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Trialing Applications for Dispensation of Marriage is certainly a legal instrument as a means of achieving justice, certainty and benefits for justice seekers, especially as a condition for marriage under the minimum age limit for marriage after the revision of the marriage law. The purpose of this study is to examine the position of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Trialing Applications for Dispensation of Marriage. This research uses normative method. The background findings of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Trying Marriage Dispensation Applications to complete the legal vacuum after the revision of the Marriage Law in providing a legal umbrella for the process of adjudicating applications for marriage dispensation which so far have not been clearly regulated in laws and regulations. Position of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 Regarding Guidelines for Adjudicating Applications for Marriage Dispensation, judges must ensure that children's statements are heard in court as an effort to prevent violations of children's rights.

查看原文本刊更多论文

最高法院2019年第5号法规关于婚姻法修订后增加婚姻豁免申请指南的立场

最高法院2019年第5号规定《婚姻豁免申请审理指南》的诞生，无疑是为求义者争取正义、确定性和利益的法律文书，特别是作为婚姻法修订后结婚最低年龄限制的条件。本研究的目的是研究2019年最高法院关于审理婚姻豁免申请指南的第5号条例的立场。本研究采用规范性研究方法。最高法院2019年第5号令《婚姻豁免申请审理指引》的背景调查结果，填补了《婚姻法》修订后的法律真空，为迄今法律法规未明确规定的婚姻豁免申请审理过程提供了法律保护伞。《2019年最高法院关于裁定婚姻豁免申请准则的第5号条例》的立场，法官必须确保在法庭上听取儿童的陈述，以防止侵犯儿童权利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks