The Individual and the Collaborative Nature of Metacognitive Strategies and Their Unfoldings for Mathematical Modelling

Q3 Multidisciplinary
L. M. Almeida, Élida Maiara Veloso de Castro
{"title":"The Individual and the Collaborative Nature of Metacognitive Strategies and Their Unfoldings for Mathematical Modelling","authors":"L. M. Almeida, Élida Maiara Veloso de Castro","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mathematical modelling has been pointed out as a means for teaching and learning mathematics in the classroom. Objective: To investigate consequences for the development of mathematical modelling activities arising from students’ metacognitive strategies. Design: The research follows the guidelines of the qualitative approach. Environment and participants: The modelling activities were developed by students in the fourth year of a Mathematics degree course. Data collection and analysis: In classes of the discipline Perspectives on Mathematical Modelling, data were collected through recordings of classes held on Google Meet. The written records produced by the students and the reports delivered by them also make up the material for analysis. Results: The unfolding evidenced for the activities can be allocated into four groups: identification of the interaction between mathematics and reality; use of mathematical concepts and construction of models; validation of models and results; back-and-forth movements in mathematical modelling activities. Conclusions: Although the main agent of metacognition is the individual, in modelling activities, metacognitive strategies are not limited to the individual nature, there is also evidence of collaborative metacognition in the group. Some developments result from more of one metacognitive strategy than another. This signals that it is not an isolated strategy, but a set of them that enables actions in mathematical modelling activities.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mathematical modelling has been pointed out as a means for teaching and learning mathematics in the classroom. Objective: To investigate consequences for the development of mathematical modelling activities arising from students’ metacognitive strategies. Design: The research follows the guidelines of the qualitative approach. Environment and participants: The modelling activities were developed by students in the fourth year of a Mathematics degree course. Data collection and analysis: In classes of the discipline Perspectives on Mathematical Modelling, data were collected through recordings of classes held on Google Meet. The written records produced by the students and the reports delivered by them also make up the material for analysis. Results: The unfolding evidenced for the activities can be allocated into four groups: identification of the interaction between mathematics and reality; use of mathematical concepts and construction of models; validation of models and results; back-and-forth movements in mathematical modelling activities. Conclusions: Although the main agent of metacognition is the individual, in modelling activities, metacognitive strategies are not limited to the individual nature, there is also evidence of collaborative metacognition in the group. Some developments result from more of one metacognitive strategy than another. This signals that it is not an isolated strategy, but a set of them that enables actions in mathematical modelling activities.
数学建模中元认知策略的个体性与协作性及其展开
背景:数学建模已被指出是课堂教学的一种手段。目的:探讨学生元认知策略对数学建模活动发展的影响。设计:本研究遵循定性方法的指导方针。环境和参与者:建模活动由数学学位课程四年级的学生开展。数据收集与分析:在《数学建模视角》这门学科的课堂上,通过谷歌Meet上的课堂录音来收集数据。学生的书面记录和报告也构成了分析的材料。结果:活动展开的证据可分为四类:数学与现实互动的识别;数学概念的运用和模型的构建;模型和结果的验证;数学建模活动中的前后运动。结论:虽然元认知的主体是个体,但在建模活动中,元认知策略并不局限于个体性质,在群体中也存在协同元认知的证据。有些发展是一种元认知策略多于另一种策略的结果。这表明它不是一个孤立的策略,而是一组能够在数学建模活动中执行操作的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信