Cattle, Viral Invasions, and State-Society Relations in a Colonial Korean Borderland

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
J. Seeley
{"title":"Cattle, Viral Invasions, and State-Society Relations in a Colonial Korean Borderland","authors":"J. Seeley","doi":"10.1215/07311613-10213156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:For early twentieth-century Koreans, one of the most feared invaders to breach the country's northern border with China was the tiny viral pathogen Rinderpest morbillivirus (rinderpest, or cattle plague). This study examines the social consequences of rinderpest outbreaks along the colonial Sino-Korean border and the methods undertaken by the Japanese Government-General of Korea to control viral \"invasions\" from Manchuria. Rinderpest prevention primarily functioned as an extension of the colonial police. Despite universal fears of rinderpest's ravages, which devastated a rural economy dependent on animal labor, colonized Koreans exhibited wide-ranging reactions to the heavy-handed methods adopted by imperial officials to fight the disease. Korean responses included outright resistance such as cross-border cattle smuggling, attacking veterinary officials, or protests against livestock travel bans, as well as varying degrees of cooperation. Moving chronologically from before the beginning of formal colonial rule in 1910 until the 1930s, this article strives to explain how a modern veterinary regime was implemented and negotiated in the northern colonial Korean borderland. Such a view is essential for understanding not only Korea's colonial past but also Korean responses to infectious disease \"invasions\" in the present day.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-10213156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:For early twentieth-century Koreans, one of the most feared invaders to breach the country's northern border with China was the tiny viral pathogen Rinderpest morbillivirus (rinderpest, or cattle plague). This study examines the social consequences of rinderpest outbreaks along the colonial Sino-Korean border and the methods undertaken by the Japanese Government-General of Korea to control viral "invasions" from Manchuria. Rinderpest prevention primarily functioned as an extension of the colonial police. Despite universal fears of rinderpest's ravages, which devastated a rural economy dependent on animal labor, colonized Koreans exhibited wide-ranging reactions to the heavy-handed methods adopted by imperial officials to fight the disease. Korean responses included outright resistance such as cross-border cattle smuggling, attacking veterinary officials, or protests against livestock travel bans, as well as varying degrees of cooperation. Moving chronologically from before the beginning of formal colonial rule in 1910 until the 1930s, this article strives to explain how a modern veterinary regime was implemented and negotiated in the northern colonial Korean borderland. Such a view is essential for understanding not only Korea's colonial past but also Korean responses to infectious disease "invasions" in the present day.
牛、病毒入侵和朝鲜边陲殖民地的国家-社会关系
摘要:对于20世纪初的朝鲜人来说,入侵朝鲜与中国北部边境的最可怕的入侵者之一是微小的病毒性病原体牛瘟病毒(牛瘟,或牛鼠疫)。本研究考察了中朝边境牛瘟爆发的社会后果,以及日本朝鲜总督府为控制满洲病毒“入侵”所采取的方法。预防牛瘟的主要作用是作为殖民地警察的延伸。牛瘟摧毁了依赖动物劳动的农村经济,尽管人们普遍担心牛瘟的肆虐,但被殖民的韩国人对帝国官员为抗击牛瘟而采取的高压手段表现出了广泛的反应。韩国方面的应对方式包括:跨境走私牲畜、攻击兽医官员、反对牲畜旅行禁令等直接的抵抗,以及不同程度的合作。从1910年正式殖民统治开始之前到20世纪30年代,本文试图解释现代兽医制度是如何在朝鲜北部殖民地边境实施和谈判的。这样的观点不仅对理解韩国的殖民历史,而且对理解韩国人今天对传染病“入侵”的反应至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信