Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or surgery in early stage (I & II) non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

H. Koyi, G. Hillerdal, S. Friesland, K. Kölbeck, Olov Andersson, Per Bergman, L. Orre, P. Liv, E. Brandén
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or surgery in early stage (I & II) non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).","authors":"H. Koyi, G. Hillerdal, S. Friesland, K. Kölbeck, Olov Andersson, Per Bergman, L. Orre, P. Liv, E. Brandén","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"99 Background: For patients with NSCLC clinical stages I and II disease with no medical contraindications, surgery is treatment of choice showing 5-year survival rates of about 60–80% for stage I and 40–50% for stage II, respectively. However, for patients who are medically or technically unfit for surgery and for patients refusing surgery, SBRT is an alternative with local control rates > 90% at 3 years. Methods: Medical journals in all patients with stage I or II NSCLC who were underwent surgery and treated with SBRT at the Department of oncology or thoracic surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In all, 267 (74.8%) underwent surgery and 90 (25.2%) were treated with SBRT. Mean, median and range of age among the surgery group was 69.2, 70.0 and 41-85 years, while in the SBRT group, these figures were 77.6, 79.0 and 52-90 years. The difference in age between the groups was significant (p < 0.001).There were significantly more comorbidites in the SBRT group. Among the surgery group, 90.2% were smokers or former smokers. The figures for SBRT group was 91.1%. The difference in smoking habits between the groups was not significant (p < 0.713). There was a significant difference in performance status (PS) between the groups (p < 0.001) with with PS 0-1 in 99.3% in the surgery group compared with 66.7% in the SBRT group. There was a significant difference in lung function with median FEV1 2.11 liter in surgery group compared to 1.3 in the SBRT group. The figures for median FEV1% was 85.0% respectively 57.0%. The median overall survival was 7.7 years for the surgery group and 3.72 years for the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Five years survival was 65.5% in the surgery group and 31.6% in the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The much worse median overall survival in the SBRT group can be explained by the selection of patients, but still, a median survival for nearly 4 years in an elderly group with so many comorbidities and a poor PS indicates that SBRT has been of value.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

99 Background: For patients with NSCLC clinical stages I and II disease with no medical contraindications, surgery is treatment of choice showing 5-year survival rates of about 60–80% for stage I and 40–50% for stage II, respectively. However, for patients who are medically or technically unfit for surgery and for patients refusing surgery, SBRT is an alternative with local control rates > 90% at 3 years. Methods: Medical journals in all patients with stage I or II NSCLC who were underwent surgery and treated with SBRT at the Department of oncology or thoracic surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In all, 267 (74.8%) underwent surgery and 90 (25.2%) were treated with SBRT. Mean, median and range of age among the surgery group was 69.2, 70.0 and 41-85 years, while in the SBRT group, these figures were 77.6, 79.0 and 52-90 years. The difference in age between the groups was significant (p < 0.001).There were significantly more comorbidites in the SBRT group. Among the surgery group, 90.2% were smokers or former smokers. The figures for SBRT group was 91.1%. The difference in smoking habits between the groups was not significant (p < 0.713). There was a significant difference in performance status (PS) between the groups (p < 0.001) with with PS 0-1 in 99.3% in the surgery group compared with 66.7% in the SBRT group. There was a significant difference in lung function with median FEV1 2.11 liter in surgery group compared to 1.3 in the SBRT group. The figures for median FEV1% was 85.0% respectively 57.0%. The median overall survival was 7.7 years for the surgery group and 3.72 years for the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Five years survival was 65.5% in the surgery group and 31.6% in the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The much worse median overall survival in the SBRT group can be explained by the selection of patients, but still, a median survival for nearly 4 years in an elderly group with so many comorbidities and a poor PS indicates that SBRT has been of value.
立体定向放疗(SBRT)或手术治疗早期(I、II期)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。
99背景:对于无医学禁忌症的NSCLC临床I期和II期患者,手术是首选的治疗方法,I期患者的5年生存率约为60-80%,II期患者的五年生存率为40-50%。然而,对于在医学或技术上不适合手术的患者和拒绝手术的患者,SBRT是一种替代方案,在3年时局部控制率>90%。方法:回顾性分析2003年至2010年在瑞典卡罗琳斯卡大学医院肿瘤科或胸外科接受SBRT治疗的所有I期或II期NSCLC患者的医学期刊。结果:267例(74.8%)接受了外科手术,90例(25.2%)接受了SBRT治疗。手术组的平均年龄、中位数和年龄范围分别为69.2岁、70.0岁和41-85岁,而SBRT组的这些数字分别为77.6岁、79.0岁和52-90岁。两组之间的年龄差异显著(p<0.001)。SBRT组的合并症明显更多。在手术组中,90.2%是吸烟者或曾经吸烟者。SBRT组的数据为91.1%。两组之间吸烟习惯的差异不显著(p<0.713)。两组间的表现状态(PS)有显著差异(p<0.001),手术组的PS0-1为99.3%,而SBRT组为66.7%。与SBRT组的1.3相比,手术组的中位FEV1为2.11升,肺功能有显著差异。FEV1%中位数分别为85.0%和57.0%。手术组的中位总生存期为7.7年,SBRT组为3.72年(p<0.001)。手术组和SBRT组的五年生存期分别为65.5%和31.6%(p<001),在患有如此多合并症和较差PS的老年组中,中位生存期近4年表明SBRT具有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信