H. Koyi, G. Hillerdal, S. Friesland, K. Kölbeck, Olov Andersson, Per Bergman, L. Orre, P. Liv, E. Brandén
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or surgery in early stage (I & II) non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).","authors":"H. Koyi, G. Hillerdal, S. Friesland, K. Kölbeck, Olov Andersson, Per Bergman, L. Orre, P. Liv, E. Brandén","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"99 Background: For patients with NSCLC clinical stages I and II disease with no medical contraindications, surgery is treatment of choice showing 5-year survival rates of about 60–80% for stage I and 40–50% for stage II, respectively. However, for patients who are medically or technically unfit for surgery and for patients refusing surgery, SBRT is an alternative with local control rates > 90% at 3 years. Methods: Medical journals in all patients with stage I or II NSCLC who were underwent surgery and treated with SBRT at the Department of oncology or thoracic surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In all, 267 (74.8%) underwent surgery and 90 (25.2%) were treated with SBRT. Mean, median and range of age among the surgery group was 69.2, 70.0 and 41-85 years, while in the SBRT group, these figures were 77.6, 79.0 and 52-90 years. The difference in age between the groups was significant (p < 0.001).There were significantly more comorbidites in the SBRT group. Among the surgery group, 90.2% were smokers or former smokers. The figures for SBRT group was 91.1%. The difference in smoking habits between the groups was not significant (p < 0.713). There was a significant difference in performance status (PS) between the groups (p < 0.001) with with PS 0-1 in 99.3% in the surgery group compared with 66.7% in the SBRT group. There was a significant difference in lung function with median FEV1 2.11 liter in surgery group compared to 1.3 in the SBRT group. The figures for median FEV1% was 85.0% respectively 57.0%. The median overall survival was 7.7 years for the surgery group and 3.72 years for the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Five years survival was 65.5% in the surgery group and 31.6% in the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The much worse median overall survival in the SBRT group can be explained by the selection of patients, but still, a median survival for nearly 4 years in an elderly group with so many comorbidities and a poor PS indicates that SBRT has been of value.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
99 Background: For patients with NSCLC clinical stages I and II disease with no medical contraindications, surgery is treatment of choice showing 5-year survival rates of about 60–80% for stage I and 40–50% for stage II, respectively. However, for patients who are medically or technically unfit for surgery and for patients refusing surgery, SBRT is an alternative with local control rates > 90% at 3 years. Methods: Medical journals in all patients with stage I or II NSCLC who were underwent surgery and treated with SBRT at the Department of oncology or thoracic surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In all, 267 (74.8%) underwent surgery and 90 (25.2%) were treated with SBRT. Mean, median and range of age among the surgery group was 69.2, 70.0 and 41-85 years, while in the SBRT group, these figures were 77.6, 79.0 and 52-90 years. The difference in age between the groups was significant (p < 0.001).There were significantly more comorbidites in the SBRT group. Among the surgery group, 90.2% were smokers or former smokers. The figures for SBRT group was 91.1%. The difference in smoking habits between the groups was not significant (p < 0.713). There was a significant difference in performance status (PS) between the groups (p < 0.001) with with PS 0-1 in 99.3% in the surgery group compared with 66.7% in the SBRT group. There was a significant difference in lung function with median FEV1 2.11 liter in surgery group compared to 1.3 in the SBRT group. The figures for median FEV1% was 85.0% respectively 57.0%. The median overall survival was 7.7 years for the surgery group and 3.72 years for the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Five years survival was 65.5% in the surgery group and 31.6% in the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The much worse median overall survival in the SBRT group can be explained by the selection of patients, but still, a median survival for nearly 4 years in an elderly group with so many comorbidities and a poor PS indicates that SBRT has been of value.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.