{"title":"Reconceptualizing the audition for the 21st century music student","authors":"Daniel J. Albert, A. Heiderscheit","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this quality improvement project was to examine a newly-implemented music admissions assessment process at a small liberal arts university and students’ perceptions of that process, which was intended to provide a holistic view of prospective students’ pre-admission achievement and to offer feedback regarding their readiness and potential success for meeting degree requirements. Faculty designed a three-part assessment process, integrating an inclusive perspective to provide them with a more complete view of a student’s skills, strengths, and areas in need of development prior to initiating their music studies. This process was designed to place students at the center of the assessment process and ensure that they have the opportunity to demonstrate their broad scope of skills. Music, human development and learning (i.e., music education) and music therapy students were invited to be interviewed regarding their experiences of the revised assessment process. Nine students participated in a focus group and were interviewed individually. Data analysis revealed four themes: Connecting with Others; Professional Identity; Developing as a Musician; Seen as an Individual. This redesigned process provided students with opportunities to create connections with their peers and faculty, serving as a means of support and belonging in the social and academic environment. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761 .","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"135 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this quality improvement project was to examine a newly-implemented music admissions assessment process at a small liberal arts university and students’ perceptions of that process, which was intended to provide a holistic view of prospective students’ pre-admission achievement and to offer feedback regarding their readiness and potential success for meeting degree requirements. Faculty designed a three-part assessment process, integrating an inclusive perspective to provide them with a more complete view of a student’s skills, strengths, and areas in need of development prior to initiating their music studies. This process was designed to place students at the center of the assessment process and ensure that they have the opportunity to demonstrate their broad scope of skills. Music, human development and learning (i.e., music education) and music therapy students were invited to be interviewed regarding their experiences of the revised assessment process. Nine students participated in a focus group and were interviewed individually. Data analysis revealed four themes: Connecting with Others; Professional Identity; Developing as a Musician; Seen as an Individual. This redesigned process provided students with opportunities to create connections with their peers and faculty, serving as a means of support and belonging in the social and academic environment. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1937761 .
期刊介绍:
Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.