Beyond Singular Tradition: "Buddhist" Pilgrimage Sites in Late Chosŏn Korea

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Maya Stiller
{"title":"Beyond Singular Tradition: \"Buddhist\" Pilgrimage Sites in Late Chosŏn Korea","authors":"Maya Stiller","doi":"10.1353/jkr.2020.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Different academic disciplines have divergent views on late Chosŏn Buddhism. Many literature scholars and art historians reject the idea that Chosŏn elite travelers could be Buddhist pilgrims, maintaining that the elite justified their trips to Buddhist pilgrimage sites by citing Daoist and Neo-Confucian ideas. Specialists in Korean history and religions, on the other hand, argue that Chosŏn literati were involved with Buddhism in various forms, showing more than philosophical interest in Buddhist doctrine. Pursuing a multi-disciplinary approach that combines art historical and literary evidence while considering the latest historical and religious studies research, this article introduces rarely studied material revealing the wide range of Chosŏn-period Buddhist travelers and their motives for going to Kŭmgangsan. Finally, it focuses on a site-specific analysis of Myogilsang in Inner Kŭmgang, which indicates that at least in some cases routine Buddhist practices were part of a scholar's life. The research presented confirms the popularity of Kŭmgangsan as a Buddhist pilgrimage site in late Chosŏn Korea, supplementing Daoist and Neo-Confucian narratives that currently predominate art history and literature scholarship.","PeriodicalId":42017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Religions","volume":"11 1","pages":"135 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jkr.2020.0015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2020.0015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Different academic disciplines have divergent views on late Chosŏn Buddhism. Many literature scholars and art historians reject the idea that Chosŏn elite travelers could be Buddhist pilgrims, maintaining that the elite justified their trips to Buddhist pilgrimage sites by citing Daoist and Neo-Confucian ideas. Specialists in Korean history and religions, on the other hand, argue that Chosŏn literati were involved with Buddhism in various forms, showing more than philosophical interest in Buddhist doctrine. Pursuing a multi-disciplinary approach that combines art historical and literary evidence while considering the latest historical and religious studies research, this article introduces rarely studied material revealing the wide range of Chosŏn-period Buddhist travelers and their motives for going to Kŭmgangsan. Finally, it focuses on a site-specific analysis of Myogilsang in Inner Kŭmgang, which indicates that at least in some cases routine Buddhist practices were part of a scholar's life. The research presented confirms the popularity of Kŭmgangsan as a Buddhist pilgrimage site in late Chosŏn Korea, supplementing Daoist and Neo-Confucian narratives that currently predominate art history and literature scholarship.
超越单一传统:Chosŏn韩国晚期的“佛教”朝圣地
摘要:不同学科对Chosŏn晚期佛教的看法存在分歧。许多文学学者和艺术史学家反对Chosŏn精英旅行者可能是佛教朝圣者的观点,他们坚持认为,精英们以道家和新儒家的思想为他们前往佛教朝圣地点的旅行辩护。而韩国历史和宗教界的专家们则认为,Chosŏn文人对佛教的兴趣超越了哲学,他们以各种形式参与了佛教。本文采用多学科的方法,结合艺术史和文学证据,同时考虑到最新的历史和宗教研究,介绍了很少被研究的材料,揭示了Chosŏn-period佛教旅行者的广泛范围以及他们前往Kŭmgangsan的动机。最后,本文着重于对内蒙古妙吉桑Kŭmgang的具体地点分析,这表明至少在某些情况下,日常的佛教实践是学者生活的一部分。此次研究结果证实了Kŭmgangsan在Chosŏn年末作为佛教圣地的知名度,补充了目前在美术史和文学学术中占主导地位的道家和新儒家的叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信