General use coordination in Japanese and Japanese Sign Language

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Yuko Asada
{"title":"General use coordination in Japanese and Japanese Sign\n Language","authors":"Yuko Asada","doi":"10.1075/sll.18003.asa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Davidson (2013) shows\n that in American Sign Language (ASL), conjunction and disjunction can be\n expressed by the same general use coordinator (cf. mary drink tea coord\n coffee ‘Mary drank tea and coffee; Mary drank tea or coffee.’). To\n derive these two meanings, she proposes an alternative semantic analysis whereby\n the two interpretations arise through universal or existential quantification\n over a set of alternatives licensed by (non-)linguistic cues, such as contexts\n and prosodic or lexical material. This paper provides supportive evidence for\n Davidson’s analysis from two other languages, Japanese and Japanese Sign\n Language. These languages are shown to employ general use coordination similar\n to that in ASL, but the general use coordinators in the three languages differ\n in one important respect: the locality of lexical elements that induce a\n disjunctive meaning. It is suggested that this cross-linguistic variation can be\n attributed to language-specific properties that concern the Q-particle discussed\n in Uegaki (2014, 2018).","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18003.asa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Davidson (2013) shows that in American Sign Language (ASL), conjunction and disjunction can be expressed by the same general use coordinator (cf. mary drink tea coord coffee ‘Mary drank tea and coffee; Mary drank tea or coffee.’). To derive these two meanings, she proposes an alternative semantic analysis whereby the two interpretations arise through universal or existential quantification over a set of alternatives licensed by (non-)linguistic cues, such as contexts and prosodic or lexical material. This paper provides supportive evidence for Davidson’s analysis from two other languages, Japanese and Japanese Sign Language. These languages are shown to employ general use coordination similar to that in ASL, but the general use coordinators in the three languages differ in one important respect: the locality of lexical elements that induce a disjunctive meaning. It is suggested that this cross-linguistic variation can be attributed to language-specific properties that concern the Q-particle discussed in Uegaki (2014, 2018).
日语和日语手语的一般使用协调
Davidson(2013)研究表明,在美国手语中,连词和析词可以用相同的通用协调词来表达(如mary drink tea coord coffee)。玛丽喝茶或喝咖啡。为了推导出这两种意义,她提出了另一种语义分析,即两种解释是通过(非)语言线索(如上下文和韵律或词汇材料)对一组替代方法进行普遍或存在量化而产生的。本文从日语和日本手语两种语言为戴维森的分析提供了支持性的证据。这些语言的一般用法协调与美国手语相似,但三种语言的一般用法协调在一个重要方面有所不同:诱发析取意义的词汇元素的位置。有人认为,这种跨语言差异可以归因于与Uegaki(2014, 2018)中讨论的q粒子有关的语言特定属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信