Production quality and pricing strategy for substitutable products under comparison effects

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Huanyu Yue, Yifan Xu
{"title":"Production quality and pricing strategy for substitutable products under comparison effects","authors":"Huanyu Yue,&nbsp;Yifan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jmse.2023.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Comparison effects have been studied extensively in many fields. In particular, existing operations management articles have discussed the impact of comparison effects on enterprises' production and pricing decisions. Research has also shown that consumers' purchasing decisions are primarily determined by three factors: product quality, selling price, and comparison effects. The current study introduces the concepts of social and temporal comparison effects to examine how comparison effects influence a monopolist’s production quality and pricing strategy for substitutable products. Results reveal the following: (1) Setting different prices for even two types of substitutable products with negligible quality differences can divide customers into three groups under the influence of social comparison effects in a single-stage model. (2) The monopolist should avoid using a price discrimination strategy in which products with a short market life cycle have the same quality but different prices. (3) When the market life cycle of products is sufficiently long in the single-product market and the market with two substitutable products, the monopolist’s optimal choice in the second stage is to keep production quality constant and increase the selling price. Consequently, the number of buyers does not decrease because of temporal comparison effects. Therefore, the firm increases its revenue. (4) For the market with two substitutable products with quality differences, one approximate optimal strategy for the enterprise in the second stage is to keep the selling price constant with the assumption that product quality cannot be adjusted after the first period. At this point, the consumption situation in the market is the same as that in the first stage. Therefore, when no external constraints exist, the monopolist firm can obtain more benefits in the second stage than in the first stage by exploiting the temporal comparison effects of consumers in the second stage. (5) When consumer identity information can be confirmed in the market, social comparison effects, similar to temporal comparison effects, could help the enterprise increase its price and profit while maintaining product quality. These social and temporal comparison effects constrain consumers. Thus, the number of people who continue to buy products does not decrease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Science and Engineering","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 529-557"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096232023000306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparison effects have been studied extensively in many fields. In particular, existing operations management articles have discussed the impact of comparison effects on enterprises' production and pricing decisions. Research has also shown that consumers' purchasing decisions are primarily determined by three factors: product quality, selling price, and comparison effects. The current study introduces the concepts of social and temporal comparison effects to examine how comparison effects influence a monopolist’s production quality and pricing strategy for substitutable products. Results reveal the following: (1) Setting different prices for even two types of substitutable products with negligible quality differences can divide customers into three groups under the influence of social comparison effects in a single-stage model. (2) The monopolist should avoid using a price discrimination strategy in which products with a short market life cycle have the same quality but different prices. (3) When the market life cycle of products is sufficiently long in the single-product market and the market with two substitutable products, the monopolist’s optimal choice in the second stage is to keep production quality constant and increase the selling price. Consequently, the number of buyers does not decrease because of temporal comparison effects. Therefore, the firm increases its revenue. (4) For the market with two substitutable products with quality differences, one approximate optimal strategy for the enterprise in the second stage is to keep the selling price constant with the assumption that product quality cannot be adjusted after the first period. At this point, the consumption situation in the market is the same as that in the first stage. Therefore, when no external constraints exist, the monopolist firm can obtain more benefits in the second stage than in the first stage by exploiting the temporal comparison effects of consumers in the second stage. (5) When consumer identity information can be confirmed in the market, social comparison effects, similar to temporal comparison effects, could help the enterprise increase its price and profit while maintaining product quality. These social and temporal comparison effects constrain consumers. Thus, the number of people who continue to buy products does not decrease.

比较效应下可替代产品的生产质量与定价策略
比较效应在许多领域得到了广泛的研究。特别是已有的经营管理文章讨论了比较效应对企业生产和定价决策的影响。研究还表明,消费者的购买决策主要由三个因素决定:产品质量、销售价格和比较效应。本研究引入社会和时间比较效应的概念,考察比较效应如何影响垄断者的生产质量和替代产品的定价策略。结果表明:(1)在单阶段模型中,即使对两种质量差异可以忽略不计的可替代产品设定不同价格,也可以在社会比较效应的影响下将消费者划分为三个群体。(2)垄断者应避免采用市场生命周期短的产品质量相同但价格不同的价格歧视策略。(3)在单产品市场和两种可替代产品市场中,当产品的市场生命周期足够长时,第二阶段垄断者的最优选择是保持产品质量不变,提高销售价格。因此,购买者的数量不会因为时间比较效应而减少。因此,公司增加了收入。(4)对于存在两种质量差异的可替代产品的市场,第二阶段企业的近似最优策略是在假设第一阶段后产品质量无法调整的情况下保持销售价格不变。此时,市场的消费情况与第一阶段相同。因此,在不存在外部约束的情况下,垄断企业可以利用第二阶段消费者的时间比较效应,在第二阶段获得比第一阶段更多的利益。(5)当消费者身份信息在市场上能够得到确认时,社会比较效应类似于时间比较效应,可以帮助企业在保持产品质量的同时提高价格和利润。这些社会和时间的比较效应约束了消费者。因此,继续购买产品的人数并没有减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Management Science and Engineering
Journal of Management Science and Engineering Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
108 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering and Applied Science (JEAS) is the official journal of the Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University (CUFE), Egypt, established in 1816. The Journal of Engineering and Applied Science publishes fundamental and applied research articles and reviews spanning different areas of engineering disciplines, applications, and interdisciplinary topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信