‘Informed consent is a bit of a joke to me’: lived experiences of insight, coercion, and capabilities in mental health care settings

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Magdalena Furgalska
{"title":"‘Informed consent is a bit of a joke to me’: lived experiences of insight, coercion, and capabilities in mental health care settings","authors":"Magdalena Furgalska","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983 found that people’s experiences and self-knowledge were mislabelled as a ‘lack of insight’. Insight, a psychiatric concept, is defined as an ability to recognise one’s mental illness, awareness of one’s symptoms and compliance with treatment. Across different jurisdictions, legal scholars have raised concerns about the influence of insight on legal provisions for psychiatric care and mental capacity assessments, given its prevalent use in psychiatry and its absence from statutory criteria. However, outside of these findings, little is known about people’s lived experiences of ‘insight’ and the law. This article draws on narrative and photo-elicitation interviews with psychiatric survivors to argue that insight is an extra-legislative proxy for regulating involuntary detention and other coercion masked as consent. Finally, this article draws on the capabilities approach to deliver a justice argument for creating real opportunities to provide informed consent in mental health settings.","PeriodicalId":45455,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in Context","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744552323000174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983 found that people’s experiences and self-knowledge were mislabelled as a ‘lack of insight’. Insight, a psychiatric concept, is defined as an ability to recognise one’s mental illness, awareness of one’s symptoms and compliance with treatment. Across different jurisdictions, legal scholars have raised concerns about the influence of insight on legal provisions for psychiatric care and mental capacity assessments, given its prevalent use in psychiatry and its absence from statutory criteria. However, outside of these findings, little is known about people’s lived experiences of ‘insight’ and the law. This article draws on narrative and photo-elicitation interviews with psychiatric survivors to argue that insight is an extra-legislative proxy for regulating involuntary detention and other coercion masked as consent. Finally, this article draws on the capabilities approach to deliver a justice argument for creating real opportunities to provide informed consent in mental health settings.
“知情同意对我来说有点像笑话”:在心理健康护理环境中的洞察力、胁迫和能力的生活经历
《1983年精神卫生法独立审查》发现,人们的经历和自我认知被错误地贴上了“缺乏洞察力”的标签。洞察力是一个精神病学的概念,被定义为认识自己的精神疾病、意识到自己的症状并遵守治疗的能力。在不同的司法管辖区,法律学者对洞察力对精神病学护理和精神能力评估的法律规定的影响表示关切,因为它在精神病学中普遍使用,而且没有法定标准。然而,除了这些发现之外,人们对“洞察力”和法律的生活经历知之甚少。这篇文章通过对精神病幸存者的叙述和照片引出式采访来论证,洞察力是一种立法外的代理,用来规范非自愿拘留和其他伪装成同意的胁迫。最后,本文借鉴了能力方法,为在心理健康环境中创造提供知情同意的真正机会提供公正的论据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信