Energy Consumption and Transportation in Developing Countries: Need for Local Scenario-Based Energy Efficiency Plans

H. Masoumi
{"title":"Energy Consumption and Transportation in Developing Countries: Need for Local Scenario-Based Energy Efficiency Plans","authors":"H. Masoumi","doi":"10.21622/RESD.2020.06.2.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like several other sub-topics of urban planning and mobility research, research on the impacts of (urban) transportation on energy consumption is mainly based on the outcomes of studies on high-income and often Western countries. Developing countries and emerging markets have a smaller share of the international research on the topic, while policymaking based on local empirical research, they could cut a percentage of unnecessary energy overuse. The benefits of policymaking based on empirical transportation / energy research do not remain limited to energy efficiency; it also has positive effects on environmental pollution control. Moreover, transportation [1] and urban planning [2,3,4] policies can limit both energy use and air pollution, however such efficiency improvements may be most effective when they are derived from the vernacular conditions. This is important because the energy consumption of the transportation sector is rapidly increasing. In a country as populated and large as China, the oil consumed by transportation corresponded to 49.6% of oil use in the whole country in 2006 [5], while the results of a study undertaken only four years later shows that 60.1% of the Chinese petroleum end-use is caused by transportation [6]. Out of the large part of overall energy use share caused by transportation sector, private cars are important users. In Mexico, private vehicles account for 31% of transport energy consumption [7]. The Chinese energy consumption and CO2 emission conditions need further improvements in the transportation sector [8]. The conditions are the same in several other comparable countries. Even though studies on developing countries and emerging markets are not comparable to those of high-income countries, still a few studies have been conducted on the relations between urban transportation and energy consumption in these geographical contexts. For instance, it has been shown that renewable energy use Granger-cause energy consumption in road transportation in Malaysia [9]. There is a unidirectional causality from transport infrastructure to energy consumption in India [10]. Furthermore, there is a bi-directional causality between transport energy consumption, FDI and CO2 emissions in Thailand and Malaysia [11]. Nevertheless, a causal relationship between transport energy use and all environmental emissions has not been found, e.g. in Pakistan no evidence for the role of transport energy consumption on CO2 emission has been recognized [12]. In many developing countries, fast urbanization is related to transportation energy use. The reason lies in the close relationship between urbanization and urban sprawl on the one hand and motorization rate and traffic generation on the other hand. Although many years ago it has been observed in several international cities that urban densities are positively correlated with transport energy consumption [13,14], it has also been shown that this relation exists only on the urban level. On a regional level, this relation is weak, as it has been shown in certain regions of Iran [15]. In Tunisia, vehicle fuel intensity, vehicle intensity, GDP per capita, urbanized kilometers and national road network were the main causes of transport energy consumption between 1990 and 2006 [16]. In China, the road transportation energy consumption rises by 1.26 percentage points for every percent increase in urbanization [17], hence changing urban morphology can theoretically result in different urban transport energy consumption [18]. The association of urbanization and energy consumption is unsurprising, as urban growth and development is an essential attribute of economic growth. A recent empirical study on the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries confirms the existence of associations of transport energy consumption and transport infrastructure with economic growth [19]. The overall conclusion of this editorial note is that although the number of recent studies on the connections of transportation and energy use in developing countries and emerging markets may look considerable, it is still not consistent and comprehensive because the mentioned studies are only considerable in number when they are accounted as a whole, as well as being focused generally on a very large geographical and cultural context. However, when investigating the smaller-scale correlation between transportation and energy use, it becomes clear that the number of reliable empirical studies in each country do not provide consistent and usable results for policymaking. The example of such studies have been produced for example on India, the results of which shows that “if rail could capture 50% modal share in the years 2005–2006 and 2020–2021, it would save nearly 35% energy consumption and emissions compared to the situation when existing patterns of modal split are allowed to continue without policy intervention.” [20]. In the example above, policymakers have received recommendations for controlling energy use and emissions based on scenario planning using the data and conditions of the local context, but the number of such studies are not enough for a population of 1.35 billion inhabitants accommodated in a wide cultural and geographical diversity. Another example of energy consumption reduction strategies based on urban transportation local scenario planning, which many developing countries need, has been done on Beijing, the results of which necessitates development of public transport in order to gain energy savings and emission reductions [21]. Finally, the third example is on Greater Cairo, where impact assessment was undertaken applying the energy efficiency and greenhouse gases reduction scenario with the assumption of “metro did not exist” for the time period of 1987-2001. In conclusion, still much more research is needed to facilitate policymaking in countries listed as developing countries and emerging markets based on local data, analyses, and scenario planning.","PeriodicalId":31382,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21622/RESD.2020.06.2.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Like several other sub-topics of urban planning and mobility research, research on the impacts of (urban) transportation on energy consumption is mainly based on the outcomes of studies on high-income and often Western countries. Developing countries and emerging markets have a smaller share of the international research on the topic, while policymaking based on local empirical research, they could cut a percentage of unnecessary energy overuse. The benefits of policymaking based on empirical transportation / energy research do not remain limited to energy efficiency; it also has positive effects on environmental pollution control. Moreover, transportation [1] and urban planning [2,3,4] policies can limit both energy use and air pollution, however such efficiency improvements may be most effective when they are derived from the vernacular conditions. This is important because the energy consumption of the transportation sector is rapidly increasing. In a country as populated and large as China, the oil consumed by transportation corresponded to 49.6% of oil use in the whole country in 2006 [5], while the results of a study undertaken only four years later shows that 60.1% of the Chinese petroleum end-use is caused by transportation [6]. Out of the large part of overall energy use share caused by transportation sector, private cars are important users. In Mexico, private vehicles account for 31% of transport energy consumption [7]. The Chinese energy consumption and CO2 emission conditions need further improvements in the transportation sector [8]. The conditions are the same in several other comparable countries. Even though studies on developing countries and emerging markets are not comparable to those of high-income countries, still a few studies have been conducted on the relations between urban transportation and energy consumption in these geographical contexts. For instance, it has been shown that renewable energy use Granger-cause energy consumption in road transportation in Malaysia [9]. There is a unidirectional causality from transport infrastructure to energy consumption in India [10]. Furthermore, there is a bi-directional causality between transport energy consumption, FDI and CO2 emissions in Thailand and Malaysia [11]. Nevertheless, a causal relationship between transport energy use and all environmental emissions has not been found, e.g. in Pakistan no evidence for the role of transport energy consumption on CO2 emission has been recognized [12]. In many developing countries, fast urbanization is related to transportation energy use. The reason lies in the close relationship between urbanization and urban sprawl on the one hand and motorization rate and traffic generation on the other hand. Although many years ago it has been observed in several international cities that urban densities are positively correlated with transport energy consumption [13,14], it has also been shown that this relation exists only on the urban level. On a regional level, this relation is weak, as it has been shown in certain regions of Iran [15]. In Tunisia, vehicle fuel intensity, vehicle intensity, GDP per capita, urbanized kilometers and national road network were the main causes of transport energy consumption between 1990 and 2006 [16]. In China, the road transportation energy consumption rises by 1.26 percentage points for every percent increase in urbanization [17], hence changing urban morphology can theoretically result in different urban transport energy consumption [18]. The association of urbanization and energy consumption is unsurprising, as urban growth and development is an essential attribute of economic growth. A recent empirical study on the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries confirms the existence of associations of transport energy consumption and transport infrastructure with economic growth [19]. The overall conclusion of this editorial note is that although the number of recent studies on the connections of transportation and energy use in developing countries and emerging markets may look considerable, it is still not consistent and comprehensive because the mentioned studies are only considerable in number when they are accounted as a whole, as well as being focused generally on a very large geographical and cultural context. However, when investigating the smaller-scale correlation between transportation and energy use, it becomes clear that the number of reliable empirical studies in each country do not provide consistent and usable results for policymaking. The example of such studies have been produced for example on India, the results of which shows that “if rail could capture 50% modal share in the years 2005–2006 and 2020–2021, it would save nearly 35% energy consumption and emissions compared to the situation when existing patterns of modal split are allowed to continue without policy intervention.” [20]. In the example above, policymakers have received recommendations for controlling energy use and emissions based on scenario planning using the data and conditions of the local context, but the number of such studies are not enough for a population of 1.35 billion inhabitants accommodated in a wide cultural and geographical diversity. Another example of energy consumption reduction strategies based on urban transportation local scenario planning, which many developing countries need, has been done on Beijing, the results of which necessitates development of public transport in order to gain energy savings and emission reductions [21]. Finally, the third example is on Greater Cairo, where impact assessment was undertaken applying the energy efficiency and greenhouse gases reduction scenario with the assumption of “metro did not exist” for the time period of 1987-2001. In conclusion, still much more research is needed to facilitate policymaking in countries listed as developing countries and emerging markets based on local data, analyses, and scenario planning.
发展中国家的能源消费和交通:对基于场景的当地能效计划的需求
与城市规划和流动性研究的其他几个子主题一样,关于(城市)交通对能源消耗影响的研究主要基于对高收入国家(通常是西方国家)的研究结果。发展中国家和新兴市场在这方面的国际研究中所占的份额较小,而基于当地实证研究的政策制定可以减少一定比例的不必要的能源过度使用。基于经验运输/能源研究的政策制定的好处并不局限于能源效率;它对环境污染控制也有积极作用。此外,交通运输和城市规划[2,3,4]政策可以限制能源使用和空气污染,然而,这种效率的提高可能是最有效的,当它们来自当地的条件。这一点很重要,因为运输部门的能源消耗正在迅速增加。在中国这样一个人口众多、幅员辽阔的国家,交通运输消耗的石油在2006年占全国石油消耗的49.6%[1],而仅仅四年后进行的一项研究结果表明,中国60.1%的石油最终使用是由交通运输引起的[1]。在交通运输部门造成的大部分整体能源使用份额中,私家车是重要的用户。在墨西哥,私家车占交通能源消耗的31%。中国交通运输领域的能源消耗和二氧化碳排放状况有待进一步改善。其他几个可比较的国家的情况也一样。尽管对发展中国家和新兴市场的研究与高收入国家的研究没有可比性,但在这些地理背景下,对城市交通与能源消费之间的关系进行了一些研究。例如,有研究表明,马来西亚道路运输中可再生能源的使用导致了能源消耗。在印度,交通基础设施与能源消耗之间存在单向因果关系。此外,泰国和马来西亚的交通能源消耗、FDI和CO2排放之间存在双向因果关系。然而,尚未发现运输能源使用与所有环境排放之间的因果关系,例如在巴基斯坦,没有证据表明运输能源消耗对二氧化碳排放的作用。在许多发展中国家,快速城市化与交通能源使用有关。究其原因,一方面是城市化和城市扩张与机动化率和交通生成量之间的密切关系。尽管多年前在几个国际城市中观察到城市密度与交通能源消耗呈正相关[13,14],但也表明这种关系仅存在于城市层面。在区域层面上,这种关系很弱,正如伊朗某些地区所显示的那样。在突尼斯,车辆燃料强度、车辆强度、人均GDP、城市化公里数和国家道路网络是1990年至2006年期间交通能源消耗的主要原因。在中国,城市化水平每提高1个百分点,道路交通能耗就会增加1.26个百分点,因此,从理论上讲,城市形态的变化会导致不同的城市交通能耗bb1。城市化和能源消耗之间的联系并不令人惊讶,因为城市增长和发展是经济增长的一个基本属性。最近对中东和北非(MENA)国家的实证研究证实,运输能源消耗和运输基础设施与经济增长之间存在关联。这篇社论的总体结论是,尽管最近关于发展中国家和新兴市场的交通和能源使用联系的研究数量可能看起来相当多,但它仍然不一致和全面,因为所提到的研究只有在它们作为一个整体考虑时才相当多,并且通常集中在一个非常大的地理和文化背景上。然而,在调查运输和能源使用之间较小规模的相关性时,很明显,每个国家可靠的实证研究的数量并没有为决策提供一致和可用的结果。以印度为例进行了此类研究,其结果表明,“如果铁路在2005-2006年和2020-2021年期间能够占据50%的运输模式份额,与允许现有的运输模式在没有政策干预的情况下继续存在相比,它将节省近35%的能源消耗和排放。”[20]。 在上面的例子中,决策者收到了关于利用当地情况的数据和条件根据情景规划控制能源使用和排放的建议,但是,对于一个文化和地理多样性广泛的13.5亿人口来说,这类研究的数量是不够的。另一个基于城市交通本地情景规划的能源消耗降低战略的例子,这是许多发展中国家需要的,已经在北京完成,其结果需要发展公共交通,以获得节能减排bb100。最后,第三个例子是大开罗,在1987-2001年期间,在假设“地铁不存在”的情况下,应用能源效率和温室气体减少方案进行了影响评估。总之,还需要进行更多的研究,以促进被列为发展中国家和新兴市场的国家根据当地数据、分析和情景规划制定政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书