Selecting and Implementing a Telementoring Program: Case Studies of Project ECHO

Rebecca Sam Larson, Caryn Medved
{"title":"Selecting and Implementing a Telementoring Program: Case Studies of Project ECHO","authors":"Rebecca Sam Larson, Caryn Medved","doi":"10.18060/25689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO) is a telementoring program for health professionals that uses adult learning techniques and interactive video technology to connect distal community providers with specialist and multidisciplinary teams in real-time collaborative sessions. We examine the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of ECHO programs at four academic medical centers through case studies based on structured interviews. The study and its analysis are informed by the Diffusion of Innovation theory and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. We found that early adopters became aware of ECHO by chance and were persuaded through observations to adopt ECHO. Finding a home for ECHO was an important initial adoption decision. Five context factors influence the implementation of ECHO: Funding, networks, staffing processes, leadership, and individual characteristics of staff. Sustainability requires ongoing funding, which itself may rely on evidence of outcomes. Findings from this study can inform the implementation of Project ECHO at other academic medical centers and extend to decisions to adopt, implement, and sustain similar telementoring programs designed to close the research-practice care gap between communities and academic medical centers.","PeriodicalId":34289,"journal":{"name":"Metropolitan Universities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metropolitan Universities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/25689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO) is a telementoring program for health professionals that uses adult learning techniques and interactive video technology to connect distal community providers with specialist and multidisciplinary teams in real-time collaborative sessions. We examine the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of ECHO programs at four academic medical centers through case studies based on structured interviews. The study and its analysis are informed by the Diffusion of Innovation theory and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. We found that early adopters became aware of ECHO by chance and were persuaded through observations to adopt ECHO. Finding a home for ECHO was an important initial adoption decision. Five context factors influence the implementation of ECHO: Funding, networks, staffing processes, leadership, and individual characteristics of staff. Sustainability requires ongoing funding, which itself may rely on evidence of outcomes. Findings from this study can inform the implementation of Project ECHO at other academic medical centers and extend to decisions to adopt, implement, and sustain similar telementoring programs designed to close the research-practice care gap between communities and academic medical centers.
远程教育项目的选择与实施——以ECHO项目为例
社区医疗保健成果扩展(ECHO项目)是一项面向卫生专业人员的远程监控计划,该计划使用成人学习技术和交互式视频技术,在实时协作会议中将远端社区提供者与专家和多学科团队联系起来。我们通过基于结构化访谈的案例研究,检查了四个学术医疗中心ECHO项目的采用、实施和可持续性。本文的研究和分析以创新扩散理论和探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架为指导。我们发现早期采用者偶然意识到ECHO,并通过观察被说服采用ECHO。为ECHO找到一个家是一项重要的最初收养决定。五个环境因素影响ECHO的实施:资金、网络、人员配备流程、领导和工作人员的个人特征。可持续性需要持续的资金,而资金本身可能依赖于成果的证据。本研究的发现可以为其他学术医疗中心实施ECHO项目提供参考,并扩展到采用、实施和维持类似的远程监控项目的决策,旨在缩小社区和学术医疗中心之间的研究实践护理差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信