Crisis of the Early Modern Period, Caravaggism, and the Rise of Gallery Painting

IF 0.2 0 ART
Ars Adriatica Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.15291/aa.3559
Nikola Dedić
{"title":"Crisis of the Early Modern Period, Caravaggism, and the Rise of Gallery Painting","authors":"Nikola Dedić","doi":"10.15291/aa.3559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, the emergence of Caravaggist naturalism has been analyzed at the intersection of two historical configurations. The first was a macro-process, an epochal crisis that the Reformation brought with it. The Reformation turn caused a comprehensive crisis of legitimacy that manifested itself in all spheres of life in Western culture: from religion to politics and to the status of images. The most important element of this early modern paradigm was the gradual formation of a new episteme (or system of knowledge organization) that can be defined as postclassical or modern. The classical episteme implied a fixed, stable, and static relationship between images, i.e. phenomena and words, i.e. discourse. The modern episteme was the moment of disintegration of this static worldview, when the organic connection between things and words, the visible and the sayable, came into danger and even a complete discrepancy. The second process took place on the micro-level and was related to the social structuring of Rome at the end of the 16th century, when there was an obvious gap between the “official” policy of the Church and the taste of high aristocratic circles; from this structuring arose the difference between the “official” art of the Counter-Reformation (which nurtured the aesthetics of the altarpiece) and the “unofficial” art, intended for the art market and consumption in a semi-private or completely profane social setting. The once unquestionable space of religion was thus split into the “micro-spaces” of politics and art, with their own special systems of legitimization.","PeriodicalId":40226,"journal":{"name":"Ars Adriatica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15291/aa.3559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, the emergence of Caravaggist naturalism has been analyzed at the intersection of two historical configurations. The first was a macro-process, an epochal crisis that the Reformation brought with it. The Reformation turn caused a comprehensive crisis of legitimacy that manifested itself in all spheres of life in Western culture: from religion to politics and to the status of images. The most important element of this early modern paradigm was the gradual formation of a new episteme (or system of knowledge organization) that can be defined as postclassical or modern. The classical episteme implied a fixed, stable, and static relationship between images, i.e. phenomena and words, i.e. discourse. The modern episteme was the moment of disintegration of this static worldview, when the organic connection between things and words, the visible and the sayable, came into danger and even a complete discrepancy. The second process took place on the micro-level and was related to the social structuring of Rome at the end of the 16th century, when there was an obvious gap between the “official” policy of the Church and the taste of high aristocratic circles; from this structuring arose the difference between the “official” art of the Counter-Reformation (which nurtured the aesthetics of the altarpiece) and the “unofficial” art, intended for the art market and consumption in a semi-private or completely profane social setting. The once unquestionable space of religion was thus split into the “micro-spaces” of politics and art, with their own special systems of legitimization.
近代早期的危机、Caravaggism与画廊绘画的兴起
本文从两种历史形态的交汇点来分析卡拉瓦吉自然主义的产生。第一个是一个宏观过程,是宗教改革带来的一场划时代的危机。宗教改革带来了一场全面的合法性危机,表现在西方文化生活的各个领域:从宗教到政治,再到图像的地位。这种早期现代范式最重要的元素是逐渐形成一种新的认识论(或知识组织体系),可以定义为后古典或现代。经典认识论隐含着图像(即现象)与词语(即话语)之间固定、稳定、静态的关系。现代认识论是这种静态世界观瓦解的时刻,当事物和词语之间的有机联系,可见的和可说的,陷入危险,甚至完全不一致。第二个过程发生在微观层面,与16世纪末罗马的社会结构有关,当时教会的“官方”政策与高级贵族圈子的品味之间存在明显差距;从这种结构中产生了反宗教改革时期的“官方”艺术(培育了祭坛画的美学)和“非官方”艺术之间的差异,后者旨在在半私人或完全世俗的社会环境中为艺术市场和消费服务。曾经不容置疑的宗教空间因此分裂为政治和艺术的“微观空间”,并有其特殊的合法化系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信