What is cocoa sustainability? Mapping stakeholders’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial constellations of priorities

Q4 Social Sciences
Judith E. Krauss
{"title":"What is cocoa sustainability? Mapping stakeholders’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial constellations of priorities","authors":"Judith E. Krauss","doi":"10.3362/1755-1986.17-000JK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given growing concerns regarding the chocolate sector’s long-term future, more private-sector, public-sector, and civil-society stakeholders have become involved in initiatives seeking to make cocoa more ‘sustainable’. However, the commercial, socio-economic, and environmental priorities they associate with the omnipresent, yet polysemic term diverge considerably: while transforming the crop into a more viable livelihood for growers is essential for some, others prioritize the crop’s links to global environmental challenges through agroforestry. A third dimension encompasses commercial concerns related to securing supply. The article explores how tensions and synergies manifest in these divergent understandings of what cocoa sustainability is and is to entail, which diverse civil-society, public-sector, and private-sector stakeholders bring to the table. It argues that priorities associated with ‘cocoa sustainability’ diverge, yielding synergies, tensions, and trade-offs. This article draws on the author’s in-depth doctoral fieldwork in cocoa sustainability initiatives incorporating environmental measures, which encompassed semi-structured interviews, focus-group discussions, documentary analysis, and participant observation in Latin America and Europe. It proposes the ‘constellations of priorities’ model as an instrument to capture how the priorities driving cocoa stakeholders variously dovetail, intersect, and collide. Particularly against the backdrop of the sector’s brewing crisis, the paper suggests that stakeholders systematically assess their and other actors’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial priorities as part of the equitable engagement required to transform the sector and attain genuine cocoa sustainability.","PeriodicalId":39025,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise Development and Microfinance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3362/1755-1986.17-000JK","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise Development and Microfinance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1755-1986.17-000JK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Given growing concerns regarding the chocolate sector’s long-term future, more private-sector, public-sector, and civil-society stakeholders have become involved in initiatives seeking to make cocoa more ‘sustainable’. However, the commercial, socio-economic, and environmental priorities they associate with the omnipresent, yet polysemic term diverge considerably: while transforming the crop into a more viable livelihood for growers is essential for some, others prioritize the crop’s links to global environmental challenges through agroforestry. A third dimension encompasses commercial concerns related to securing supply. The article explores how tensions and synergies manifest in these divergent understandings of what cocoa sustainability is and is to entail, which diverse civil-society, public-sector, and private-sector stakeholders bring to the table. It argues that priorities associated with ‘cocoa sustainability’ diverge, yielding synergies, tensions, and trade-offs. This article draws on the author’s in-depth doctoral fieldwork in cocoa sustainability initiatives incorporating environmental measures, which encompassed semi-structured interviews, focus-group discussions, documentary analysis, and participant observation in Latin America and Europe. It proposes the ‘constellations of priorities’ model as an instrument to capture how the priorities driving cocoa stakeholders variously dovetail, intersect, and collide. Particularly against the backdrop of the sector’s brewing crisis, the paper suggests that stakeholders systematically assess their and other actors’ socio-economic, environmental, and commercial priorities as part of the equitable engagement required to transform the sector and attain genuine cocoa sustainability.
什么是可可的可持续性?绘制利益相关者的社会经济、环境和商业优先事项
鉴于对巧克力行业长期前景的担忧日益增加,越来越多的私营部门、公共部门和民间社会利益相关者参与到寻求使可可更具“可持续性”的倡议中来。然而,他们对这种无所不在的多义词的商业、社会经济和环境优先事项的看法存在很大分歧:虽然对一些人来说,将作物转化为种植者更可行的生计至关重要,但其他人则优先考虑通过农林业将作物与全球环境挑战联系起来。第三个方面包括与确保供应有关的商业问题。本文探讨了不同的公民社会、公共部门和私营部门利益相关者对可可可持续性的不同理解是如何体现出紧张和协同作用的。它认为,与“可可可持续性”相关的优先事项存在分歧,产生了协同效应、紧张关系和权衡。这篇文章借鉴了作者在可可豆可持续发展倡议方面的深入博士实地工作,包括半结构化访谈,焦点小组讨论,文献分析,以及在拉丁美洲和欧洲的参与者观察。它提出了“优先事项星座”模型,作为一种工具,以捕捉驱动可可利益相关者的优先事项如何以不同的方式吻合、相交和碰撞。特别是在该行业正在酝酿危机的背景下,本文建议利益相关者系统地评估他们和其他参与者的社会经济、环境和商业优先事项,作为该行业转型和实现真正的可可可持续性所需的公平参与的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Enterprise Development and Microfinance
Enterprise Development and Microfinance Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: EDM encourages critical thinking on how market systems can be more inclusive and sustainable, with concrete implications for designing, implementing, and evaluating business support programmes. EDM is essential reading for practitioners, researchers, donors, policymakers, and finance specialists engaged in market-related activities involving poor people in the global South. The coverage includes but is not restricted to: • Financial inclusion (inclusive financial services and products) • Emerging financing models (impact investment, responsible finance, social lending) • Value chain analysis and development • Inclusive business models • Equity (gender, youth, marginalized) in access to financial services and value chains • Political and regulatory framework for SME development and financial services • ICT for business development and financial services • Sustainability standards • Advisory services for SMEs • Impact assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信