God Talk: Seeing and Hearing the Dialogue in Heaven in Paradise Lost

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY
Antoinina Bevan Zlatar
{"title":"God Talk: Seeing and Hearing the Dialogue in Heaven in Paradise Lost","authors":"Antoinina Bevan Zlatar","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.63.2.0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Milton's anthropomorphic representation of the Father and the Son in book 3 of Paradise Lost has always courted controversy. Early readers were divided, some faulting it for blasphemy, others praising it for the accuracy of its characterization. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, the dialogue in heaven became, and continues to be, embroiled in the debate concerning Milton's anti-Trinitarian beliefs, and the question of the Father's goodness, prompted by the discovery of De Doctrina Christiana. This article adopts a new perspective by situating the celestial scene in the context of the varied iconography of the Trinity that flourished in the Middle Ages in England and on the Continent, an iconography that would be subject to reform during the Reformation and considered anathema by Milton's more iconoclastic contemporaries. Focusing on this pictorial tradition allows us to revisit Milton's critique of the doctrine of the Trinity, to take note of his scripturally licensed iconophilia, and to see and hear the passion at the heart of the dialogue.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"211 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/miltonstudies.63.2.0211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Milton's anthropomorphic representation of the Father and the Son in book 3 of Paradise Lost has always courted controversy. Early readers were divided, some faulting it for blasphemy, others praising it for the accuracy of its characterization. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, the dialogue in heaven became, and continues to be, embroiled in the debate concerning Milton's anti-Trinitarian beliefs, and the question of the Father's goodness, prompted by the discovery of De Doctrina Christiana. This article adopts a new perspective by situating the celestial scene in the context of the varied iconography of the Trinity that flourished in the Middle Ages in England and on the Continent, an iconography that would be subject to reform during the Reformation and considered anathema by Milton's more iconoclastic contemporaries. Focusing on this pictorial tradition allows us to revisit Milton's critique of the doctrine of the Trinity, to take note of his scripturally licensed iconophilia, and to see and hear the passion at the heart of the dialogue.
神话:《失乐园》中的天堂对话
摘要:弥尔顿在《失乐园》第三卷中对父子的拟人化描绘,一直引起争议。早期的读者意见分歧,一些人指责它亵渎神明,另一些人则称赞它描述的准确性。在二十世纪和二十一世纪,天堂的对话开始并将继续卷入关于米尔顿反三位一体信仰的辩论,以及由于发现了基督教义而引发的关于父的善的问题。本文采用了一种新的视角,将天象置于中世纪英国和欧洲大陆蓬勃发展的三位一体的各种图像学背景下,这种图像学在宗教改革期间将受到改革,并被弥尔顿的同时代人视为亵渎。专注于这一绘画传统,我们可以重新审视米尔顿对三位一体学说的批判,注意到他在圣经上许可的肖像主义,并看到和听到对话核心的激情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信