The Royalty Rate Is FRAND or Excessive? The Practice in the EU, China, and the Applicability of Selected Economic Models

CHEN Wenjing
{"title":"The Royalty Rate Is FRAND or Excessive? The Practice in the EU, China, and the Applicability of Selected Economic Models","authors":"CHEN Wenjing","doi":"10.17265/1548-6605/2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Excessive pricing would raise competition concern not only in the EU, but also in China. Dominant undertakings are required, in some refusal-to-license related cases, to license their IPRs on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms. This paper, firstly from a legal perspective, distinguishes two situations involving the concept of FRAND. Then this paper investigates the definition of FRAND concept and the practice respectively in the EU and China. To strike a balance between maintaining competitive market order and providing sufficient compensation for IPR holders, economists have proposed several models, by which the economic value of the IPR at issue could be indirectly calculated and thus a FRAND royalty rate could be determined. However, those models leave many issues open in the real markets and the limitation is particularly obvious in the licensing scenario following an abusive refusal to license ruling.","PeriodicalId":57290,"journal":{"name":"美中法律评论:英文版","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"美中法律评论:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2022.06.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Excessive pricing would raise competition concern not only in the EU, but also in China. Dominant undertakings are required, in some refusal-to-license related cases, to license their IPRs on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms. This paper, firstly from a legal perspective, distinguishes two situations involving the concept of FRAND. Then this paper investigates the definition of FRAND concept and the practice respectively in the EU and China. To strike a balance between maintaining competitive market order and providing sufficient compensation for IPR holders, economists have proposed several models, by which the economic value of the IPR at issue could be indirectly calculated and thus a FRAND royalty rate could be determined. However, those models leave many issues open in the real markets and the limitation is particularly obvious in the licensing scenario following an abusive refusal to license ruling.
特许权使用费费率是FRAND还是过高?欧盟、中国的实践与某些经济模式的适用性
定价过高不仅会在欧盟,也会在中国引发竞争担忧。在一些与拒绝许可相关的案件中,要求占主导地位的经营者以公平、合理和非歧视(“FRAND”)的条款许可其知识产权。本文首先从法律的角度对涉及FRAND概念的两种情况进行了区分。然后分别考察了欧盟和中国FRAND概念的界定和实践。为了在维持竞争市场秩序和为知识产权持有人提供足够的补偿之间取得平衡,经济学家提出了几个模型,通过这些模型,可以间接计算争议知识产权的经济价值,从而确定FRAND特许权使用费。然而,这些模式在实际市场中留下了许多问题,并且在滥用拒绝许可裁决之后的许可场景中,限制尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
609
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书