Sustainable Palm Oil: What Drives it and Why Aren’t We There Yet?

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Saidatul Nurul Hidayah Nor Ahmad, A. Amran, S. A.K, Rusniza Abdul Rahman
{"title":"Sustainable Palm Oil: What Drives it and Why Aren’t We There Yet?","authors":"Saidatul Nurul Hidayah Nor Ahmad, A. Amran, S. A.K, Rusniza Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.22452/ajba.vol15no1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manuscript type: Research paper Research aims: This study explores the institutional pressure and motivation that drives Malaysian palm oil companies to embark on sustainability practices, and uncovers the impediments of substantive change in producing truly sustainable palm oil. Design/Methodology/Approach: A case study methodology was employed, gathering primary and secondary data through semistructured interviews with the company’s personnel and external stakeholders, through informal conversations and group discussions with company workers, document analyses, and observations. The neo-institutional and legitimacy theory were used as the primary lens to explain the study findings. Research findings: The results indicate that both external pressures and internal issues have forced the company to engage in sustainability practices – primarily through certification. Unlike the independent stakeholder pressure found in previous studies, a chain reaction of pressures was found from NGOs and competitors to multinational buyers, whom in turn put pressure on the case company, thus jeopardising their financial bottom lines. Regulatory pressures, conforming to the industry norms, wooing host country’s government, investors, and financiers add to the external motivation. Reputational problems and labour shortages, business case for sustainability, and the philanthropic nature of family-owned firms are the internal elements behind the endeavour. The barrier to change towards sustainability was mainly caused by cost concern, technical difficulties, mindset of workers, unsupportive business environment and impracticalities of safety equipment design. Originality/value: The findings shed light on the inner motive and barriers of change towards producing sustainable palm oil, the understanding of which is vital in driving further substantive changes in the palm oil industry towards sustainable development. Research limitation/Implication: The study was restricted to a single case company in the Malaysian palm oil industry and hence, generalisation of the study findings onto another context should be done in a cautious manner. Keywords: Organisational change, Neo-institutional theory, Legitimacy theory, Palm oil, Sustainability reporting and practice JEL Classification: Q56","PeriodicalId":54083,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Business and Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Business and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol15no1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Manuscript type: Research paper Research aims: This study explores the institutional pressure and motivation that drives Malaysian palm oil companies to embark on sustainability practices, and uncovers the impediments of substantive change in producing truly sustainable palm oil. Design/Methodology/Approach: A case study methodology was employed, gathering primary and secondary data through semistructured interviews with the company’s personnel and external stakeholders, through informal conversations and group discussions with company workers, document analyses, and observations. The neo-institutional and legitimacy theory were used as the primary lens to explain the study findings. Research findings: The results indicate that both external pressures and internal issues have forced the company to engage in sustainability practices – primarily through certification. Unlike the independent stakeholder pressure found in previous studies, a chain reaction of pressures was found from NGOs and competitors to multinational buyers, whom in turn put pressure on the case company, thus jeopardising their financial bottom lines. Regulatory pressures, conforming to the industry norms, wooing host country’s government, investors, and financiers add to the external motivation. Reputational problems and labour shortages, business case for sustainability, and the philanthropic nature of family-owned firms are the internal elements behind the endeavour. The barrier to change towards sustainability was mainly caused by cost concern, technical difficulties, mindset of workers, unsupportive business environment and impracticalities of safety equipment design. Originality/value: The findings shed light on the inner motive and barriers of change towards producing sustainable palm oil, the understanding of which is vital in driving further substantive changes in the palm oil industry towards sustainable development. Research limitation/Implication: The study was restricted to a single case company in the Malaysian palm oil industry and hence, generalisation of the study findings onto another context should be done in a cautious manner. Keywords: Organisational change, Neo-institutional theory, Legitimacy theory, Palm oil, Sustainability reporting and practice JEL Classification: Q56
可持续棕榈油:是什么推动了它,为什么我们还没有做到?
手稿类型:研究论文研究目的:本研究探讨了推动马来西亚棕榈油公司开展可持续发展实践的制度压力和动机,并揭示了在生产真正可持续的棕榈油方面进行实质性变革的障碍。设计/方法/方法:采用案例研究方法,通过对公司人员和外部利益相关者的半结构化访谈,通过与公司员工的非正式对话和小组讨论,文件分析和观察,收集主要和次要数据。新制度和合法性理论被用作解释研究结果的主要视角。研究结果:研究结果表明,外部压力和内部问题都迫使公司参与可持续发展实践——主要是通过认证。与之前的研究中发现的独立利益相关者压力不同,从非政府组织和竞争对手到跨国买家,都存在压力的连锁反应,而跨国买家又向案例公司施加压力,从而危及其财务底线。监管压力、符合行业规范、吸引东道国政府、投资者和金融家增加了外部动机。声誉问题和劳动力短缺、可持续发展的商业案例以及家族企业的慈善性质是这项努力背后的内部因素。向可持续性转变的障碍主要是由成本问题、技术困难、工人的心态、不支持的商业环境以及安全设备设计的不切实际造成的。独创性/价值:研究结果揭示了生产可持续棕榈油的内在动机和障碍,了解这一点对于推动棕榈油行业朝着可持续发展方向进一步发生实质性变化至关重要。研究局限性/含义:该研究仅限于马来西亚棕榈油行业的一家案例公司,因此,应谨慎地将研究结果推广到另一个背景下。关键词:组织变革,新制度理论,合法性理论,棕榈油,可持续性报告和实践JEL分类:Q56
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: An academic journal that aims to advance knowledge in the business and accounting disciplines, to narrow the gap between theory and practice, and to set direction for policy initiatives in Asia. Welcome to the Asian Journal of Business and Accounting (AJBA). AJBA is an international refereed journal, published biannually (30th June and 30th December) by the Faculty of Business and Accountancy, University of Malaya, Malaysia. AJBA aims to publish scholarly business researches that are relevant to Malaysia and the Asian region. It intends to highlight the practical implications in promoting better business decision making process and the formulation of public policy in Asia. This journal publishes theoretical, conceptual, and empirical papers within the broad areas of business and accounting in Asia. The AJBA covers a broad spectrum of the business and accounting disciplines. A suggestive (though not necessarily comprehensive) list of areas that would be included in this journal are: general management, strategic management, human resource management, organizational behaviour, labour and industrial relations, international business management, business communication, entrepreneurship, leadership, management science, operations management, production management, supply chain management, marketing management, brand management, consumer behaviour, information management, e-marketing, e-commerce, quality management, retailing, service marketing, hospitality management, hotel and tourism management, asset pricing, capital and money markets, corporate finance, derivatives markets, finance and banking, financial economics, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信