Comparative Study on Fatigue Life of CFRP Composites with Damages

Q4 Engineering
Marta Baran, P. Synaszko, J. Lisiecki, S. Kłysz
{"title":"Comparative Study on Fatigue Life of CFRP Composites with Damages","authors":"Marta Baran, P. Synaszko, J. Lisiecki, S. Kłysz","doi":"10.2478/fas-2019-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this work, the compressive residual strength tests results, Compression After Impact (CAI), are presented. The specimens were made of carbon-epoxy prepreg E722-02 UHS 130-14. Two variants of specimens were tested: samples undamaged and samples with damage that was centrally introduced by a drop-weight impact, as per the ASTM D7136/7136M standard. An impactor with potential energy equal to 15J and the type of support required by the standard were used. The size of impacted damages, defined as an area of damage on a plane perpendicular to the impact direction, and the equivalent diameter were specified using the flash thermography method. The tests were performed using the fixtures manufactured according to the ASTM D7137/7137M standard. The specimens were compressed to determine the residual strength. This value was afterwards used to specify the force levels for the fatigue tests. The fatigue tests were carried out under force control – with a sinusoidal shape, stress ratio R equal to 0.1 and frequency f 1Hz. Maximum force in a loading cycle Pmax was being increased after each thousand of cycles N until its value was close to the residual strength determined in the previously mentioned tests. In this work, the following relationships were presented: force-displacement P-δ for both static and fatigue tests and displacement-loading cycles δ-N for fatigue tests. A method of conducting the fatigue tests of CFRP composite was proposed, in which both the CAI specimens and CAI fixture were used. This allowed researchers to accelerate making initial comparisons between the two groups of specimens with damages – grouped relative to the way of conditioning.","PeriodicalId":37629,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue of Aircraft Structures","volume":"2019 1","pages":"28 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue of Aircraft Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/fas-2019-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this work, the compressive residual strength tests results, Compression After Impact (CAI), are presented. The specimens were made of carbon-epoxy prepreg E722-02 UHS 130-14. Two variants of specimens were tested: samples undamaged and samples with damage that was centrally introduced by a drop-weight impact, as per the ASTM D7136/7136M standard. An impactor with potential energy equal to 15J and the type of support required by the standard were used. The size of impacted damages, defined as an area of damage on a plane perpendicular to the impact direction, and the equivalent diameter were specified using the flash thermography method. The tests were performed using the fixtures manufactured according to the ASTM D7137/7137M standard. The specimens were compressed to determine the residual strength. This value was afterwards used to specify the force levels for the fatigue tests. The fatigue tests were carried out under force control – with a sinusoidal shape, stress ratio R equal to 0.1 and frequency f 1Hz. Maximum force in a loading cycle Pmax was being increased after each thousand of cycles N until its value was close to the residual strength determined in the previously mentioned tests. In this work, the following relationships were presented: force-displacement P-δ for both static and fatigue tests and displacement-loading cycles δ-N for fatigue tests. A method of conducting the fatigue tests of CFRP composite was proposed, in which both the CAI specimens and CAI fixture were used. This allowed researchers to accelerate making initial comparisons between the two groups of specimens with damages – grouped relative to the way of conditioning.
CFRP复合材料损伤后疲劳寿命的比较研究
摘要本文介绍了冲击后压缩(Compression After Impact, CAI)残余抗压强度试验结果。样品采用碳-环氧预浸料E722-02 UHS 130-14制备。根据ASTM D7136/7136M标准,测试了两种不同的样品:未损坏的样品和由落锤撞击引起的损坏样品。使用了势能等于15J的冲击器和标准要求的支撑类型。用闪蒸热成像法确定了冲击损伤的大小,即垂直于冲击方向平面上的损伤区域,并确定了等效直径。试验使用按照ASTM D7137/7137M标准制造的夹具进行。试样被压缩以测定残余强度。该值随后用于指定疲劳试验的力水平。疲劳试验是在力控制下进行的-正弦形状,应力比R等于0.1,频率f为1Hz。加载周期内的最大力Pmax在每一千次循环N后增加,直到其值接近上述试验中确定的残余强度。在这项工作中,提出了以下关系:静力和疲劳试验的力-位移P-δ和疲劳试验的位移-加载周期δ-N。提出了一种采用CAI试样和CAI夹具进行CFRP复合材料疲劳试验的方法。这使得研究人员可以加快对两组损伤标本的初步比较——根据条件作用的方式进行分组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures
Fatigue of Aircraft Structures Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The publication focuses on problems of aeronautical fatigue and structural integrity. The preferred topics include: full-scale fatigue testing of aircraft and aircraft structural components, fatigue of materials and structures, advanced materials and innovative structural concepts, damage tolerant design of aircraft structure, life extension and management of ageing fleets, structural health monitoring and loads, fatigue crack growth and life prediction methods, NDT inspections, airworthiness considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信