Psychophysical scaling method for measurement of colors concept in children and adults

Q2 Psychology
Marcelo Fernandes Costa , Carlo Martins Gaddi , Vitor Melo Gonsalez , Fraulein Vidigal de Paula
{"title":"Psychophysical scaling method for measurement of colors concept in children and adults","authors":"Marcelo Fernandes Costa ,&nbsp;Carlo Martins Gaddi ,&nbsp;Vitor Melo Gonsalez ,&nbsp;Fraulein Vidigal de Paula","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2021.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our study aimed to present a new method to generate a scale for color concept distances using the Law of Comparative Judgment and derivate an interval scale for the amount of color concept salience. A hundred thirty-eight participants (mean age ​= ​22.7 ​yrs; SD ​= ​1.9) with normal visual acuity and color vision were evaluated. Additional 225 children were also evaluated (mean age ​= ​8,9yrs; SD ​= ​2.3). The task consisted of writing a list of the one-term word for colors and data were analyzed based on Thurstone's rank order scaling method. For adults, the most salient concept was blue and the less was violet with a distance for concepts of 3.51 units between them, whereas for children the most salient concept was blue and the less was violet with a distance for concepts of 3.67 units between them. Significant differences between adults and children occurred for white, brown, pink, orange, gray, and violet. The internal consistency of our measurement was lower than 0.1% for almost all colors which suggests high reliability for both age groups, except for brown and anil in children. Thus, our innovative approach produces quantitative interval class data rather than categorical or ordinal data allowing quantitative measurement of the amount of the concept salience on a one-dimensional scale, feasible to be used for adults and children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260121000345/pdfft?md5=37a5a03678c0e1271bfc9bcceadcc4d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590260121000345-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260121000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Our study aimed to present a new method to generate a scale for color concept distances using the Law of Comparative Judgment and derivate an interval scale for the amount of color concept salience. A hundred thirty-eight participants (mean age ​= ​22.7 ​yrs; SD ​= ​1.9) with normal visual acuity and color vision were evaluated. Additional 225 children were also evaluated (mean age ​= ​8,9yrs; SD ​= ​2.3). The task consisted of writing a list of the one-term word for colors and data were analyzed based on Thurstone's rank order scaling method. For adults, the most salient concept was blue and the less was violet with a distance for concepts of 3.51 units between them, whereas for children the most salient concept was blue and the less was violet with a distance for concepts of 3.67 units between them. Significant differences between adults and children occurred for white, brown, pink, orange, gray, and violet. The internal consistency of our measurement was lower than 0.1% for almost all colors which suggests high reliability for both age groups, except for brown and anil in children. Thus, our innovative approach produces quantitative interval class data rather than categorical or ordinal data allowing quantitative measurement of the amount of the concept salience on a one-dimensional scale, feasible to be used for adults and children.

儿童和成人颜色概念测量的心理物理标度法
本研究旨在提出一种利用比较判断定律生成颜色概念距离尺度的新方法,并推导出颜色概念显著性量的间隔尺度。138名参与者(平均年龄22.7岁;SD = 1.9),视敏度和色觉正常。另外225名儿童也被评估(平均年龄= 8.9岁;sd = 2.3)。该任务包括编写颜色的单词列表,并根据Thurstone的秩顺序缩放方法分析数据。对于成人来说,最显著的概念是蓝色,最不显著的概念是紫色,两者之间的概念距离为3.51个单位,而对于儿童来说,最显著的概念是蓝色,最不显著的概念是紫色,两者之间的概念距离为3.67个单位。白色、棕色、粉色、橙色、灰色和紫色在成人和儿童之间存在显著差异。我们测量的内部一致性低于0.1%,几乎所有的颜色,这表明高可靠性,两个年龄组,除了棕色和蓝色的儿童。因此,我们的创新方法产生定量区间类数据,而不是分类或有序数据,允许在一维尺度上定量测量概念显著性的数量,适用于成人和儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信