COMMON SIGNS AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DISCOURSE OF TEACHERS IN THE CZECH AND SLOVAK REPUBLICS ON THEIR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND CAREER GROWTH

Jaroslav Pěnička
{"title":"COMMON SIGNS AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DISCOURSE OF TEACHERS IN THE CZECH AND SLOVAK REPUBLICS ON THEIR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND CAREER GROWTH","authors":"Jaroslav Pěnička","doi":"10.18355/pg.2019.8.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of improving the educational process and the results associated with it is declared as a priority objective in the Czech and Slovak environments. The path of professionalization of teachers may be conceptual for improving the quality of education. The professional development of a teacher becomes a central category. The paper aims to present the results of research dedicated to the discourse of teachers about professional development and career growth in the Czech and Slovak Republics. For the discourse analysis, as the central design, research uses a qualitative approach in research. Using modelling in the focus group, discourse characterization categories are created through grounded theory and open coding. Despite the absence of career growth in the Czech Republic, the central category for participants in both countries is their internal motivation for further education - being a better teacher for their pupils. There is a negative attitude of teachers towards the ability of the state to assess who is a “good” teacher through career stages in Slovakia in relation to the career system; then the Czech Republic is accentuated by what criteria the state will do. Based on the participant's arguments, the author assumes that the system of in-service training should provide teachers with opportunities for further education. The primary function should be to ensure the quality and diversity of in-service training programs, as well as to provide teachers with opportunities and freedoms to participate.","PeriodicalId":34591,"journal":{"name":"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavonic Pedagogical Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18355/pg.2019.8.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of improving the educational process and the results associated with it is declared as a priority objective in the Czech and Slovak environments. The path of professionalization of teachers may be conceptual for improving the quality of education. The professional development of a teacher becomes a central category. The paper aims to present the results of research dedicated to the discourse of teachers about professional development and career growth in the Czech and Slovak Republics. For the discourse analysis, as the central design, research uses a qualitative approach in research. Using modelling in the focus group, discourse characterization categories are created through grounded theory and open coding. Despite the absence of career growth in the Czech Republic, the central category for participants in both countries is their internal motivation for further education - being a better teacher for their pupils. There is a negative attitude of teachers towards the ability of the state to assess who is a “good” teacher through career stages in Slovakia in relation to the career system; then the Czech Republic is accentuated by what criteria the state will do. Based on the participant's arguments, the author assumes that the system of in-service training should provide teachers with opportunities for further education. The primary function should be to ensure the quality and diversity of in-service training programs, as well as to provide teachers with opportunities and freedoms to participate.
捷克和斯洛伐克教师专业发展和职业成长话语的共同标志和差异
在捷克和斯洛伐克的环境中,改善教育过程及其相关成果的目标被宣布为优先目标。教师专业化的道路可能是提高教育质量的概念。教师的专业发展成为一个中心范畴。本文旨在介绍捷克共和国和斯洛伐克共和国教师关于职业发展和职业成长的研究结果。对于话语分析,作为中心设计,研究采用定性的方法进行研究。利用焦点小组中的建模,通过扎根理论和开放编码创建话语表征类别。尽管捷克共和国没有职业发展,但这两个国家的参与者的核心类别是他们继续教育的内在动机——成为学生更好的老师。在斯洛伐克,教师对国家在职业体系的职业阶段评估谁是“好”教师的能力持消极态度;根据参与者的论点,作者认为在职培训制度应该为教师提供继续教育的机会。主要职能应是确保在职培训计划的质量和多样性,并为教师提供参与的机会和自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信