Do Financial Statement Auditors Recognise ESG-Related Aspects as Key Audit Matters?

Magdalena Indyk
{"title":"Do Financial Statement Auditors Recognise ESG-Related Aspects as Key Audit Matters?","authors":"Magdalena Indyk","doi":"10.20869/auditf/2023/170/010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the recent trends in ESG (which stands for Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance) is an attempt to combine sustainability and financial reporting through direct references to financial statement figures (cf. the ED IFRS S1, S2, the CSRD). This article aims to verify whether it is possible. For this reason, it was assumed that Key Audit Matters (KAMs) identified by financial statement auditors might be a valuable source of information. Identification of ESG-related KAMs by auditors may prove that ESG information is directly traceable to a financial statement and, thus, quantifiable. The empirical part was based on 142 audit reports on the consolidated financial statements for 2021. The sample focused on ESG-related capital groups with the parent entity listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. 292 KAMs were obtained, among which 38 (13.01% of the sample) were identified as ESG-related (32 Environmental, 1 Social, and 5 Governance). This research paper: (1) confirms that it is possible to link ESG matters and their outcomes directly to financial statement categories, (2) shows that some areas could be more challenging to quantify, for example, social or governance aspects which may not be seen directly as a financial statement category, (3) comments on KAMs as a good information source if well-written. The article underlines that any attempts to combine sustainability and financial reporting might be demanding. The ESG-exposed businesses are privileged here as their financial statements naturally present ESG-related categories. However, it raises further questions about the presentation, comparability, and integrated reporting quality of all entities, which will have to consider financial and ESG linkages in the future. This article does not answer these questions, is limited to the perspective of KAMs, and, thus, touches only on identified financial statement categories. The article, with its findings, may be important to standard-setters, companies, and other researchers contributing to ESG, financial reporting, and financial audit.","PeriodicalId":30958,"journal":{"name":"Audit Financiar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audit Financiar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20869/auditf/2023/170/010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the recent trends in ESG (which stands for Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance) is an attempt to combine sustainability and financial reporting through direct references to financial statement figures (cf. the ED IFRS S1, S2, the CSRD). This article aims to verify whether it is possible. For this reason, it was assumed that Key Audit Matters (KAMs) identified by financial statement auditors might be a valuable source of information. Identification of ESG-related KAMs by auditors may prove that ESG information is directly traceable to a financial statement and, thus, quantifiable. The empirical part was based on 142 audit reports on the consolidated financial statements for 2021. The sample focused on ESG-related capital groups with the parent entity listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. 292 KAMs were obtained, among which 38 (13.01% of the sample) were identified as ESG-related (32 Environmental, 1 Social, and 5 Governance). This research paper: (1) confirms that it is possible to link ESG matters and their outcomes directly to financial statement categories, (2) shows that some areas could be more challenging to quantify, for example, social or governance aspects which may not be seen directly as a financial statement category, (3) comments on KAMs as a good information source if well-written. The article underlines that any attempts to combine sustainability and financial reporting might be demanding. The ESG-exposed businesses are privileged here as their financial statements naturally present ESG-related categories. However, it raises further questions about the presentation, comparability, and integrated reporting quality of all entities, which will have to consider financial and ESG linkages in the future. This article does not answer these questions, is limited to the perspective of KAMs, and, thus, touches only on identified financial statement categories. The article, with its findings, may be important to standard-setters, companies, and other researchers contributing to ESG, financial reporting, and financial audit.
财务报表审计师是否认识到esg相关方面是关键审计事项?
ESG(代表环境,社会和公司治理)的最新趋势之一是试图通过直接参考财务报表数据(参见ED IFRS S1, S2, CSRD)将可持续性与财务报告结合起来。本文旨在验证这是否可能。因此,假定由财务报表审计员确定的关键审计事项(KAMs)可能是一个有价值的信息来源。审计师对ESG相关kamam的识别可以证明ESG信息可直接追溯到财务报表,因此是可量化的。实证部分基于对2021年合并财务报表的142份审计报告。样本集中于母公司在华沙证券交易所上市的与esg相关的资本集团,共获得292家kam,其中38家(占样本的13.01%)被确定为与esg相关(32家环境,1家社会,5家治理)。本研究论文:(1)证实有可能将ESG事项及其结果直接与财务报表类别联系起来;(2)表明一些领域可能更具挑战性,例如,社会或治理方面可能不会被直接视为财务报表类别;(3)如果写得好,对kam的评论是一个很好的信息来源。这篇文章强调,任何将可持续发展与财务报告结合起来的尝试都可能是苛刻的。有esg风险的企业在这方面享有特权,因为它们的财务报表自然呈现出与esg相关的类别。然而,它提出了关于所有主体的列报、可比性和综合报告质量的进一步问题,这些问题将在未来考虑财务和ESG的联系。本文不回答这些问题,限于kamm的视角,因此仅涉及已确定的财务报表类别。这篇文章及其发现可能对标准制定者、公司和其他研究ESG、财务报告和财务审计的研究人员很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信