Collective action by community groups: solutions for climate change or different players in the same game?

IF 3.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Luke J. Matthews, A. Clark-Ginsberg, Michelle Scobie, Laura E. R. Peters, Unni Gopinathan, A. Mosurska, Katy Davis, S. Myhre, Saskia Hirsch, E. Meriläinen, I. Kelman
{"title":"Collective action by community groups: solutions for climate change or different players in the same game?","authors":"Luke J. Matthews, A. Clark-Ginsberg, Michelle Scobie, Laura E. R. Peters, Unni Gopinathan, A. Mosurska, Katy Davis, S. Myhre, Saskia Hirsch, E. Meriläinen, I. Kelman","doi":"10.1080/17565529.2022.2149254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community groups are taking initiatives to adapt to a changing climate. These organizations differ from businesses and governments by being non-profit, often informal, resource limited, and reliant on volunteer labor. How these organizations facilitate collective action is not well known, especially since they do not necessarily solve common pool resource governance, but rather improve common pool resources through collective action. In fact, at first glance, community groups seem to not have the means for solving collective action problems used routinely in industry and government, such as paying people for cooperation or punishing them for lack of it. This article investigates how community groups solve collective action problems though data gathered across 25 organizations in three sites – Sitka, Alaska, USA; Toco, Trinidad; and a global site of distributed citizen science organizations. We found that community groups used positive reinforcement methods common to industry and used little punishment. Groups also engaged in mechanisms for collective action, such as relying on altruistic contributions by few individuals, that generally are not considered commonplace in businesses and governments. We conclude by discussing implications from this study for collective action theory and for how policymakers might learn from community groups to address climate change.","PeriodicalId":47734,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Development","volume":"15 1","pages":"679 - 691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate and Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2022.2149254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Community groups are taking initiatives to adapt to a changing climate. These organizations differ from businesses and governments by being non-profit, often informal, resource limited, and reliant on volunteer labor. How these organizations facilitate collective action is not well known, especially since they do not necessarily solve common pool resource governance, but rather improve common pool resources through collective action. In fact, at first glance, community groups seem to not have the means for solving collective action problems used routinely in industry and government, such as paying people for cooperation or punishing them for lack of it. This article investigates how community groups solve collective action problems though data gathered across 25 organizations in three sites – Sitka, Alaska, USA; Toco, Trinidad; and a global site of distributed citizen science organizations. We found that community groups used positive reinforcement methods common to industry and used little punishment. Groups also engaged in mechanisms for collective action, such as relying on altruistic contributions by few individuals, that generally are not considered commonplace in businesses and governments. We conclude by discussing implications from this study for collective action theory and for how policymakers might learn from community groups to address climate change.
社区团体的集体行动:气候变化的解决方案还是同一游戏中的不同参与者?
社区团体正在采取主动措施来适应不断变化的气候。这些组织不同于企业和政府,因为它们是非营利性的,通常是非正式的,资源有限,并且依赖于志愿者。这些组织如何促进集体行动尚不清楚,特别是因为它们不一定解决公共池资源治理,而是通过集体行动改善公共池资源。事实上,乍一看,社区团体似乎没有办法解决工业和政府经常使用的集体行动问题,比如付钱给合作的人,或者因为缺乏合作而惩罚他们。本文通过收集来自美国阿拉斯加州锡特卡市的25个组织的数据,调查了社区团体如何解决集体行动问题;体罚,特立尼达拉岛;以及一个分布在全球的公民科学组织网站。我们发现,社区团体使用了与工业界相同的正强化方法,并且很少使用惩罚。团体还参与集体行动的机制,例如依靠少数个人的利他主义贡献,这在企业和政府中通常不被认为是司空见惯的。最后,我们讨论了这项研究对集体行动理论的启示,以及政策制定者如何从社区团体中学习以应对气候变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.70%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信