Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health

Ronald Ralf Becerra Rodríguez
{"title":"Legal Pluralism as a Theory for the Challenges on Environmental Health","authors":"Ronald Ralf Becerra Rodríguez","doi":"10.22395/OJUM.V18N36A10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to justify the theory of legal pluralism for studying environmen-tal health issues. The positive law approach has made some headway, although some areas of environmental health seem to be incipient. Hard law has encoun-tered difficulties to succeed in enforcing industrial pollution or water contamina-tion. Furthermore, national jurisdictions are prone to support particular economic interests. This conundrum of legal positivism encourages challenging it with the theory of pluralism. It is found that the latter might allow deliberation and active participation of non-state actors within environmental health. It is also discussed that the plurality of law allows certain flexibility due to its little hierarchization, the lack of theoretical rules and the relaxation of state sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":30109,"journal":{"name":"Opinion Juridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opinion Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22395/OJUM.V18N36A10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper intends to justify the theory of legal pluralism for studying environmen-tal health issues. The positive law approach has made some headway, although some areas of environmental health seem to be incipient. Hard law has encoun-tered difficulties to succeed in enforcing industrial pollution or water contamina-tion. Furthermore, national jurisdictions are prone to support particular economic interests. This conundrum of legal positivism encourages challenging it with the theory of pluralism. It is found that the latter might allow deliberation and active participation of non-state actors within environmental health. It is also discussed that the plurality of law allows certain flexibility due to its little hierarchization, the lack of theoretical rules and the relaxation of state sovereignty.
应对环境健康挑战的法律多元主义理论
本文旨在为研究环境健康问题的法律多元主义理论进行辩护。积极的法律方针取得了一些进展,尽管环境卫生的一些领域似乎还处于起步阶段。严格的法律在执行工业污染或水污染方面遇到了困难。此外,国家司法管辖区倾向于支持特定的经济利益。法律实证主义的这一难题促使人们用多元主义理论来挑战它。研究发现,后者可能允许非国家行为体在环境卫生领域进行审议和积极参与。并讨论了法律的多元性由于其等级性小、缺乏理论规则和国家主权的松弛而具有一定的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信