{"title":"A Statistical Review of Template Model Builder: A Flexible Tool for Spatial Modelling","authors":"Aaron Osgood-Zimmerman, Jon Wakefield","doi":"10.1111/insr.12534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) is a well-known and popular technique for spatial modelling with a user-friendly interface in the <span>R-INLA</span> package. Unfortunately, only a certain class of latent Gaussian models are amenable to fitting with INLA. In this paper, we review template model builder (<span>TMB</span>), an existing technique and software package which is well-suited to fitting complex spatio-temporal models. <span>TMB</span> is relatively unknown to the spatial statistics community, but it is a flexible random effects modelling tool which allows users to define customizable and complex mixed effects models through <span>C++</span> templates. After contrasting the methodology behind <span>TMB</span> with INLA, we provide a large-scale simulation study assessing and comparing <span>R-INLA</span> and <span>TMB</span> for continuous spatial models, fitted via the stochastic partial differential equations (SPDE) approximation. The results show that the predictive fields from both methods are comparable in most situations even though <span>TMB</span> estimates for fixed or random effects may have slightly larger bias than <span>R-INLA</span>. We also present a smaller discrete spatial simulation study, in which both approaches perform well. We conclude with a joint analysis of breast cancer incidence and mortality data implemented in <span>TMB</span> which requires a model which cannot be fit with <span>R-INLA</span>.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14479,"journal":{"name":"International Statistical Review","volume":"91 2","pages":"318-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Statistical Review","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/insr.12534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) is a well-known and popular technique for spatial modelling with a user-friendly interface in the R-INLA package. Unfortunately, only a certain class of latent Gaussian models are amenable to fitting with INLA. In this paper, we review template model builder (TMB), an existing technique and software package which is well-suited to fitting complex spatio-temporal models. TMB is relatively unknown to the spatial statistics community, but it is a flexible random effects modelling tool which allows users to define customizable and complex mixed effects models through C++ templates. After contrasting the methodology behind TMB with INLA, we provide a large-scale simulation study assessing and comparing R-INLA and TMB for continuous spatial models, fitted via the stochastic partial differential equations (SPDE) approximation. The results show that the predictive fields from both methods are comparable in most situations even though TMB estimates for fixed or random effects may have slightly larger bias than R-INLA. We also present a smaller discrete spatial simulation study, in which both approaches perform well. We conclude with a joint analysis of breast cancer incidence and mortality data implemented in TMB which requires a model which cannot be fit with R-INLA.
期刊介绍:
International Statistical Review is the flagship journal of the International Statistical Institute (ISI) and of its family of Associations. It publishes papers of broad and general interest in statistics and probability. The term Review is to be interpreted broadly. The types of papers that are suitable for publication include (but are not limited to) the following: reviews/surveys of significant developments in theory, methodology, statistical computing and graphics, statistical education, and application areas; tutorials on important topics; expository papers on emerging areas of research or application; papers describing new developments and/or challenges in relevant areas; papers addressing foundational issues; papers on the history of statistics and probability; white papers on topics of importance to the profession or society; and historical assessment of seminal papers in the field and their impact.