Time-efficiency factors in road tunnel rescue as perceived by Swedish operative personnel – an interview study

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Johan Hylander, B. Saveman, U. Björnstig, Lina Gyllencreutz, A. Westman
{"title":"Time-efficiency factors in road tunnel rescue as perceived by Swedish operative personnel – an interview study","authors":"Johan Hylander, B. Saveman, U. Björnstig, Lina Gyllencreutz, A. Westman","doi":"10.1108/ijes-03-2021-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeMajor incidents in road tunnels remain a collaborative challenge for the emergency services (fire and rescue service, police and ambulance), emergency dispatch centres (EDCs) and infrastructure owners. The aim of this paper is to investigate how collaborative partners to the ambulance services perceive the rescue effort and to identify factors that may influence its efficiency.Design/methodology/approachFocus group and individual interviews were conducted with 19 participants who were infrastructure owners or had operational or tactical responsibilities with the emergency services or EDCs in two regions in Sweden with multiple road tunnels. The collected data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.FindingsThree main categories described efficiency factors during and after an incident: (1) coordinating the initial information (using a shared terminology), (2) achieving situational awareness (identifying those persons in need) and (3) lessons (not) learnt (lack of joint tactical plans and exercises). The emerging theme was access, assess and evaluate.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that establishing national policies and collaborative forums might yield more efficiently managed rescue efforts in road tunnel incidents in Sweden and other countries with similar organisational structures.Originality/valueThis study offers new insights on interoperability during responses to complex underground incidents.","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-03-2021-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeMajor incidents in road tunnels remain a collaborative challenge for the emergency services (fire and rescue service, police and ambulance), emergency dispatch centres (EDCs) and infrastructure owners. The aim of this paper is to investigate how collaborative partners to the ambulance services perceive the rescue effort and to identify factors that may influence its efficiency.Design/methodology/approachFocus group and individual interviews were conducted with 19 participants who were infrastructure owners or had operational or tactical responsibilities with the emergency services or EDCs in two regions in Sweden with multiple road tunnels. The collected data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.FindingsThree main categories described efficiency factors during and after an incident: (1) coordinating the initial information (using a shared terminology), (2) achieving situational awareness (identifying those persons in need) and (3) lessons (not) learnt (lack of joint tactical plans and exercises). The emerging theme was access, assess and evaluate.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that establishing national policies and collaborative forums might yield more efficiently managed rescue efforts in road tunnel incidents in Sweden and other countries with similar organisational structures.Originality/valueThis study offers new insights on interoperability during responses to complex underground incidents.
瑞典工作人员对公路隧道救援中时间效率因素的感知——一项访谈研究
目的公路隧道内的重大事故仍然是应急服务(消防和救援服务、警察和救护车)、应急调度中心(EDC)和基础设施所有者面临的合作挑战。本文的目的是调查救护车服务的合作伙伴如何看待救援工作,并确定可能影响其效率的因素。设计/方法/方法对19名参与者进行了焦点小组和个人访谈,这些参与者是瑞典两个拥有多条公路隧道的地区的基础设施所有者,或在应急服务或EDC中负有操作或战术责任。使用定性内容分析对收集的数据进行分析。调查结果三大类描述了事件期间和之后的效率因素:(1)协调初始信息(使用共享术语),(2)实现态势感知(识别需要帮助的人)和(3)经验教训(未)(缺乏联合战术计划和演习)。新出现的主题是获取、评估和评价。实际意义研究结果表明,在瑞典和其他组织结构相似的国家,建立国家政策和合作论坛可能会提高公路隧道事故救援工作的管理效率。独创性/价值这项研究为应对复杂地下事件的互操作性提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信