The Fundamental and Ornamental Use of Scripture in Two Dominican Procedurals on Confession from the Early Thirteenth Century: Cum ad sacerdotes and Confessio debet

IF 0.2 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
A. Cuff
{"title":"The Fundamental and Ornamental Use of Scripture in Two Dominican Procedurals on Confession from the Early Thirteenth Century: Cum ad sacerdotes and Confessio debet","authors":"A. Cuff","doi":"10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Although the expansion of jurisprudence in the twelfth century was a direct outgrowth of theological scholasticism, several historians of law such as Richard Helmholz have noted that the use of sacred scripture as a basis for jurisprudence steadily declined in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. He identified the increasing relegation of biblical references to an ornamental, rather than a fundamental, mode of citation beginning with the earliest post-Gratian glosses and treatises. Because the Dominican Order of Preachers, renowned for their biblical preaching, also produced many great canonists and legal texts, the question of whether their legal writings experienced a similar decline is of particular interest. In the present study, a close reading of two Dominican procedurals for confessors and penitents will conclude that the Dominicans themselves recognized the difference between fundamental and ornamental citation and that they began to streamline their biblical references, removing ornamental and leaving only fundamental citations.","PeriodicalId":40395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JMEDIRELICULT.44.2.0170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Although the expansion of jurisprudence in the twelfth century was a direct outgrowth of theological scholasticism, several historians of law such as Richard Helmholz have noted that the use of sacred scripture as a basis for jurisprudence steadily declined in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. He identified the increasing relegation of biblical references to an ornamental, rather than a fundamental, mode of citation beginning with the earliest post-Gratian glosses and treatises. Because the Dominican Order of Preachers, renowned for their biblical preaching, also produced many great canonists and legal texts, the question of whether their legal writings experienced a similar decline is of particular interest. In the present study, a close reading of two Dominican procedurals for confessors and penitents will conclude that the Dominicans themselves recognized the difference between fundamental and ornamental citation and that they began to streamline their biblical references, removing ornamental and leaving only fundamental citations.
从13世纪早期开始的两个多明尼加忏悔程序中经文的基本和装饰性使用:Cum ad sacerdotes和Confessio debbet
虽然法理学在12世纪的扩张是神学经院哲学的直接产物,但一些法律史学家,如理查德·赫尔姆霍尔兹(Richard Helmholz)已经注意到,在13世纪和14世纪,使用圣经作为法理学基础的情况稳步下降。他指出,从格拉提安之后最早的注释和论文开始,圣经引用越来越多地被贬低为一种装饰性的引用,而不是一种基本的引用模式。因为以圣经布道而闻名的多明尼加传教士会,也产生了许多伟大的圣徒和法律文本,他们的法律著作是否经历了类似的衰落,这个问题特别有趣。在本研究中,仔细阅读两道明会的告解者和忏悔者程序,会得出结论道明会自己认识到基本引用和装饰性引用之间的区别,他们开始精简圣经引用,去掉装饰性引用,只留下基本引用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures
Journal of Medieval Religious Cultures MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信