Protection of Migrant Workers under the ICMW: Incompatibility with Malaysian Laws and Position in ASEAN

Q3 Social Sciences
S.N. Abdul Aziz, Salawati Mat Basir
{"title":"Protection of Migrant Workers under the ICMW: Incompatibility with Malaysian Laws and Position in ASEAN","authors":"S.N. Abdul Aziz, Salawati Mat Basir","doi":"10.20956/halrev.v7i3.3066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The International Convention on The Protection of The Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (ICMW) is the only Human Rights Convention that distinguishes between normal and irregular migrants in great detail. An analysis of the situation in Malaysia, based on feedback from relevant stakeholders, shows that there are insurmountable obstacles to ratification in relation to the ambiguous policy status for migrant workers, which is based on ad hoc policies. Malaysian legislation appears to be straightforward in its approach to labour migration policies, as it defines and categorises migrants into two distinct ‘categories': registered migrant (regular migrant) and undocumented migrant (irregular migrant), regardless of ability level. This article demonstrates that, despite the barriers and incompatibilities with national laws, the Convention, which is primarily a human rights instrument aimed at protecting the fundamental rights of all migrants, could assist Malaysia in ensuring a holistic and sustainable migration management that takes into account the needs of a whole approach and support from all parties involved, including but not limited to the Malaysian government. Part I of the article will go through the history of the convention's adoption, followed by Part II on the state of Malaysia's migration laws and policies, Part III on the compatibility and incompatibility of Malaysian laws with the ICMW and the position in ASEAN, and Part IV on recommendations.","PeriodicalId":30743,"journal":{"name":"Hasanuddin Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hasanuddin Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v7i3.3066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The International Convention on The Protection of The Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (ICMW) is the only Human Rights Convention that distinguishes between normal and irregular migrants in great detail. An analysis of the situation in Malaysia, based on feedback from relevant stakeholders, shows that there are insurmountable obstacles to ratification in relation to the ambiguous policy status for migrant workers, which is based on ad hoc policies. Malaysian legislation appears to be straightforward in its approach to labour migration policies, as it defines and categorises migrants into two distinct ‘categories': registered migrant (regular migrant) and undocumented migrant (irregular migrant), regardless of ability level. This article demonstrates that, despite the barriers and incompatibilities with national laws, the Convention, which is primarily a human rights instrument aimed at protecting the fundamental rights of all migrants, could assist Malaysia in ensuring a holistic and sustainable migration management that takes into account the needs of a whole approach and support from all parties involved, including but not limited to the Malaysian government. Part I of the article will go through the history of the convention's adoption, followed by Part II on the state of Malaysia's migration laws and policies, Part III on the compatibility and incompatibility of Malaysian laws with the ICMW and the position in ASEAN, and Part IV on recommendations.
ICMW对移民工人的保护:与马来西亚法律和在东盟的地位不符
《保护所有移徙工人及其家庭成员权利国际公约》是唯一详细区分正常移徙者和非正常移徙者的人权公约。根据相关利益攸关方的反馈对马来西亚的情况进行的分析表明,移民工人的政策地位模糊不清,这是基于临时政策的,在批准方面存在着不可逾越的障碍。马来西亚立法对劳工移民政策的处理方式似乎很简单,因为它将移民定义并归类为两个不同的“类别”:注册移民(正常移民)和无证移民(非正常移民),无论能力水平如何。该条表明,尽管存在障碍和与国家法律不兼容的情况,《公约》主要是一项旨在保护所有移民基本权利的人权文书,但它可以帮助马来西亚确保全面和可持续的移民管理,考虑到整体方法的需要和所有有关各方的支持,包括但不限于马来西亚政府。文章的第一部分将介绍公约通过的历史,然后是关于马来西亚移民法律和政策现状的第二部分,关于马来西亚法律与国际移徙妇女委员会的兼容性和不兼容性以及在东盟的立场的第三部分,以及关于建议的第四部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hasanuddin Law Review
Hasanuddin Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信