Taming the Merge Operator

IF 1.1 3区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Xuejing Huang, Jinxu Zhao, B. C. D. S. Oliveira
{"title":"Taming the Merge Operator","authors":"Xuejing Huang, Jinxu Zhao, B. C. D. S. Oliveira","doi":"10.1017/S0956796821000186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Calculi with disjoint intersection types support a symmetric merge operator with subtyping. The merge operator generalizes record concatenation to any type, enabling expressive forms of object composition, and simple solutions to hard modularity problems. Unfortunately, recent calculi with disjoint intersection types and the merge operator lack a (direct) operational semantics with expected properties such as determinism and subject reduction, and only account for terminating programs. This paper proposes a type-directed operational semantics (TDOS) for calculi with intersection types and a merge operator. We study two variants of calculi in the literature. The first calculus, called λi, is a variant of a calculus presented by Oliveira et al. (2016) and closely related to another calculus by Dunfield (2014). Although Dunfield proposes a direct small-step semantics for her calculus, her semantics lacks both determinism and subject reduction. Using our TDOS, we obtain a direct semantics for λi that has both properties. The second calculus, called λi+, employs the well-known subtyping relation of Barendregt, Coppo and Dezani-Ciancaglini (BCD). Therefore, λi+ extends the more basic subtyping relation of λi, and also adds support for record types and nested composition (which enables recursive composition of merged components). To fully obtain determinism, both λi and λi+ employ a disjointness restriction proposed in the original λi calculus. As an added benefit the TDOS approach deals with recursion in a straightforward way, unlike previous calculi with disjoint intersection types where recursion is problematic. We relate the static and dynamic semantics of λi to the original version of the calculus and the calculus by Dunfield. Furthermore, for λi+, we show a novel formulation of BCD subtyping, which is algorithmic, has a very simple proof of transitivity and allows for the modular addition of distributivity rules (i.e. without affecting other rules of subtyping). All results have been fully formalized in the Coq theorem prover.","PeriodicalId":15874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Programming","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956796821000186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Calculi with disjoint intersection types support a symmetric merge operator with subtyping. The merge operator generalizes record concatenation to any type, enabling expressive forms of object composition, and simple solutions to hard modularity problems. Unfortunately, recent calculi with disjoint intersection types and the merge operator lack a (direct) operational semantics with expected properties such as determinism and subject reduction, and only account for terminating programs. This paper proposes a type-directed operational semantics (TDOS) for calculi with intersection types and a merge operator. We study two variants of calculi in the literature. The first calculus, called λi, is a variant of a calculus presented by Oliveira et al. (2016) and closely related to another calculus by Dunfield (2014). Although Dunfield proposes a direct small-step semantics for her calculus, her semantics lacks both determinism and subject reduction. Using our TDOS, we obtain a direct semantics for λi that has both properties. The second calculus, called λi+, employs the well-known subtyping relation of Barendregt, Coppo and Dezani-Ciancaglini (BCD). Therefore, λi+ extends the more basic subtyping relation of λi, and also adds support for record types and nested composition (which enables recursive composition of merged components). To fully obtain determinism, both λi and λi+ employ a disjointness restriction proposed in the original λi calculus. As an added benefit the TDOS approach deals with recursion in a straightforward way, unlike previous calculi with disjoint intersection types where recursion is problematic. We relate the static and dynamic semantics of λi to the original version of the calculus and the calculus by Dunfield. Furthermore, for λi+, we show a novel formulation of BCD subtyping, which is algorithmic, has a very simple proof of transitivity and allows for the modular addition of distributivity rules (i.e. without affecting other rules of subtyping). All results have been fully formalized in the Coq theorem prover.
驯服合并操作符
不相交类型的微积分支持带子类型的对称归并算子。merge操作符将记录连接一般化为任何类型,支持对象组合的表达形式,以及对难模块化问题的简单解决方案。不幸的是,最近具有不相交相交类型和合并操作符的演算缺乏具有预期属性(如确定性和主题约简)的(直接)操作语义,并且只考虑终止程序。本文提出了一种面向类型的运算语义(TDOS)和一个合并算子。我们在文献中研究了结石的两种变体。第一种微积分称为λi,是Oliveira等人(2016)提出的微积分的变体,与Dunfield(2014)的另一种微积分密切相关。虽然邓菲尔德为她的微积分提出了一种直接的小步语义学,但她的语义学既缺乏决定论,也缺乏主体约简。使用我们的TDOS,我们获得了λi的直接语义,它具有这两个性质。第二种演算称为λi+,它采用了著名的Barendregt、Coppo和Dezani-Ciancaglini (BCD)的亚型关系。因此,λi+扩展了λi的更基本的子类型关系,并且还增加了对记录类型和嵌套组合的支持(这使得合并组件的递归组合成为可能)。为了充分获得决定论,λi和λi+都采用了原λi演算中提出的不连接性限制。作为一个额外的好处,TDOS方法以一种直接的方式处理递归,不像以前的不相交类型的演算,递归是有问题的。我们将λi的静态和动态语义与原始版本的微积分和Dunfield的微积分联系起来。此外,对于λi+,我们给出了BCD子类型的一个新公式,它是算法的,具有非常简单的传递性证明,并且允许分配性规则的模加法(即不影响子类型的其他规则)。所有的结果都在Coq定理证明中完全形式化了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Programming
Journal of Functional Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Programming is the only journal devoted solely to the design, implementation, and application of functional programming languages, spanning the range from mathematical theory to industrial practice. Topics covered include functional languages and extensions, implementation techniques, reasoning and proof, program transformation and synthesis, type systems, type theory, language-based security, memory management, parallelism and applications. The journal is of interest to computer scientists, software engineers, programming language researchers and mathematicians interested in the logical foundations of programming.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信