Mosquito Net Fishing as a Normal Accident and the Roles of Traditional and Bureaucratic Authority

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
R. Welsh, Elizabeth A. Pickard, S. Ryan, J. Bisesi, J. Makaure, D. J. Stewart, D. Larsen
{"title":"Mosquito Net Fishing as a Normal Accident and the Roles of Traditional and Bureaucratic Authority","authors":"R. Welsh, Elizabeth A. Pickard, S. Ryan, J. Bisesi, J. Makaure, D. J. Stewart, D. Larsen","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2022.2139443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the 1980s, malaria researchers experimented with treating mosquito nets with pyrethroids chemicals to kill mosquitoes (insecticide-treated net or ITN). In the mid-2000s, world health agencies determined that ITNs should be distributed freely. Since then more than two billion ITNs have been distributed throughout malaria-endemic countries. In regions where fishing is an important economic activity the ITNs have been repurposed for fishing. The practice has been found to have very negative effects on fisheries. Using Perrow’s Normal Accident Framework (NAF) we explain how interest-driven parties ignore local conditions to cause ‘accidents’ such as mosquito net fishing (MNF). In addition, we employ Weber’s concepts of bureaucratic and traditional authority to understand how local actors address an ‘accident’ not of their making. Then, using two focus group interviews with Traditional Leaders and Zambian Government Fishery Personnel we shed light on how local sociohistorical conditions interact with imposed, massive, and complex sociotechnical systems.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2139443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In the 1980s, malaria researchers experimented with treating mosquito nets with pyrethroids chemicals to kill mosquitoes (insecticide-treated net or ITN). In the mid-2000s, world health agencies determined that ITNs should be distributed freely. Since then more than two billion ITNs have been distributed throughout malaria-endemic countries. In regions where fishing is an important economic activity the ITNs have been repurposed for fishing. The practice has been found to have very negative effects on fisheries. Using Perrow’s Normal Accident Framework (NAF) we explain how interest-driven parties ignore local conditions to cause ‘accidents’ such as mosquito net fishing (MNF). In addition, we employ Weber’s concepts of bureaucratic and traditional authority to understand how local actors address an ‘accident’ not of their making. Then, using two focus group interviews with Traditional Leaders and Zambian Government Fishery Personnel we shed light on how local sociohistorical conditions interact with imposed, massive, and complex sociotechnical systems.
蚊网捕鱼作为一种正常事故与传统和官僚机构的作用
在20世纪80年代,疟疾研究人员进行了用拟除虫菊酯化学物质处理蚊帐以杀死蚊子的实验(杀虫剂处理蚊帐或ITN)。在2000年代中期,世界卫生机构确定应免费分发ITNs。自那时以来,已在疟疾流行国家分发了20多亿个蚊帐。在捕鱼是一项重要经济活动的区域,渔网已改作捕鱼用途。人们发现这种做法对渔业有非常负面的影响。利用Perrow的正常事故框架(NAF),我们解释了利益驱动的各方如何忽视当地条件而导致“事故”,例如蚊帐捕鱼(MNF)。此外,我们运用韦伯的官僚主义和传统权威的概念来理解地方行动者如何处理不是他们造成的“事故”。然后,通过对传统领导人和赞比亚政府渔业人员的两次焦点小组访谈,我们阐明了当地社会历史条件如何与强加的、大规模的、复杂的社会技术系统相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信