Suk Yu Chan, Heavenly Providence: A Historical Exploration of the Development of Calvin's Biblical Doctrine of Divine Providence (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2022), pp. 209. €130.00/$163.00.

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Donald K. Mckim
{"title":"Suk Yu Chan, Heavenly Providence: A Historical Exploration of the Development of Calvin's Biblical Doctrine of Divine Providence (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2022), pp. 209. €130.00/$163.00.","authors":"Donald K. Mckim","doi":"10.1017/S003693062300042X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book is an historical study of John Calvin ’ s interpretation of the doctrine of divine providence. It explores Calvin ’ s works from 1534 to 1559 and contends that from 1534 to 1541, Calvin ’ s dominant image for providence is that of a ‘ fountain ’ , which conveys God as the source of everything. God ’ s power gives life and preserves all earthly crea-tures. Then, from Calvin ’ s Latin edition of his 1539 Institutes and its French translation (1541), Calvin is more vague – indecisive – about the definition of God ’ s special provi-dence, as he explored the relation of providence and soteriology. Calvin ’ s doctrine from 1534 onward thus ‘ displays a development rather than a fixed doctrine ’ (p. 56). The fountain image dropped out after 1552. Chan notes that ‘ Calvin gradually moves away from portraying God ’ s providence as a fountain because God ’ s providence is more than what can be illustrated by the image of a fountain … . God ’ s action is not passive as a fountain implies. In addition, God ’ s providence does not imply passivity in the role of believers ’ (p. 179). Instead, three definitions of providence emerged. Chan explains that in Calvin ’ s De aeterna Dei praedestinatione (1552), providentia Dei is: first, ‘ a general providence of the world so that everything is kept in its proper and natural state ’ ; second, there is a ‘ special government of particular parts of the world, but this care is especially for humans ’ ; third is a ‘ providentia “ praesentissima Dei ”’ , in which God protects and guides the church by his fatherly care ’ (p. 178). This clarification of the providentia Dei is what Calvin used ‘ to preach, to write commentaries and to finish his definitive edition of the Institutes ’ (p. 56).","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":"76 1","pages":"398 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S003693062300042X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This book is an historical study of John Calvin ’ s interpretation of the doctrine of divine providence. It explores Calvin ’ s works from 1534 to 1559 and contends that from 1534 to 1541, Calvin ’ s dominant image for providence is that of a ‘ fountain ’ , which conveys God as the source of everything. God ’ s power gives life and preserves all earthly crea-tures. Then, from Calvin ’ s Latin edition of his 1539 Institutes and its French translation (1541), Calvin is more vague – indecisive – about the definition of God ’ s special provi-dence, as he explored the relation of providence and soteriology. Calvin ’ s doctrine from 1534 onward thus ‘ displays a development rather than a fixed doctrine ’ (p. 56). The fountain image dropped out after 1552. Chan notes that ‘ Calvin gradually moves away from portraying God ’ s providence as a fountain because God ’ s providence is more than what can be illustrated by the image of a fountain … . God ’ s action is not passive as a fountain implies. In addition, God ’ s providence does not imply passivity in the role of believers ’ (p. 179). Instead, three definitions of providence emerged. Chan explains that in Calvin ’ s De aeterna Dei praedestinatione (1552), providentia Dei is: first, ‘ a general providence of the world so that everything is kept in its proper and natural state ’ ; second, there is a ‘ special government of particular parts of the world, but this care is especially for humans ’ ; third is a ‘ providentia “ praesentissima Dei ”’ , in which God protects and guides the church by his fatherly care ’ (p. 178). This clarification of the providentia Dei is what Calvin used ‘ to preach, to write commentaries and to finish his definitive edition of the Institutes ’ (p. 56).
Suk Yu Chan,《天意:加尔文圣经天意学说发展的历史探索》(Göttingen:Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht,2022),第209页。130.00欧元/163.00美元。
这本书是对约翰·加尔文对天意学说的解释的历史研究。它探讨了加尔文1534年至1559年的作品,并认为从1534年到1541年,加尔文对天意的主要形象是“喷泉”,它传达了上帝是一切的源泉。上帝的力量赋予生命,并保存了世间所有的造物。然后,从加尔文1539年的拉丁文版《Institutes》及其法语译本(1541)来看,加尔文在探索天意与神学的关系时,对上帝的特殊存在的定义更加模糊——犹豫不决。因此,从1534年起加尔文的学说“显示了一种发展而非固定的学说”(第56页)。喷泉的图像在1552年后消失了。陈指出,加尔文逐渐不再把上帝的天意描绘成喷泉,因为上帝的天命不仅仅是喷泉的形象。上帝的行为并不像喷泉所暗示的那样是被动的。此外,上帝的天意并不意味着信徒角色的被动(第179页)。相反,天意的三个定义出现了。陈解释说,在加尔文的《天意》(1552)中,天意是:首先,“世界的普遍天意,使一切都保持在适当和自然的状态”;第二,有一个“世界特定地区的特殊政府,但这种照顾是特别针对人类的”;第三个是“上帝的恩典”,上帝通过他父亲般的关怀来保护和引导教会(第178页)。这种对上帝的澄清是加尔文用来“传教、写评论和完成他权威版的研究院”(第56页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信