Pandemic priorities: the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on ethical leadership in the healthcare profession.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
A. Musbahi, Alex Mcculla, J. Ramsingh
{"title":"Pandemic priorities: the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on ethical leadership in the healthcare profession.","authors":"A. Musbahi, Alex Mcculla, J. Ramsingh","doi":"10.1108/LHS-02-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe COVID 19 pandemic has brought into sharp focus the importance of leadership and the ethics of health-care leadership. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of COVID 19 on ethical leadership principles using a validated quantitative survey of NHS leaders to compare pre- and post-pandemic ethical leadership principles.\n\n\nDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH\nThis study involved a quantitative survey of NHS \"leaders\". Inclusion criteria included consultants and registrars leading clinical teams, or NHS managers, senior nurses and matrons. The survey was designed as a modification of the Ethical Leadership Questionnaire proposed by Langlois et al. (2013). A modification was made to ask questions from the questionnaire pertaining to before the pandemic and presently. This allowed a comparison of responses and measures of ethical leadership qualities before and after the pandemic. Twenty-three questions were on attitudes pre-pandemic, and 23 were post-pandemic.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nA total of 79 responses were received. Responses were divided for analysis into those related to an ethics of care dimension, those related to ethics of justice and those related to the ethics of critique. This study has found significant changes in attitudes of health-care leaders with regards to the ethics of critique. Leaders were more likely post-pandemic to speak out against injustice and unfair practices. Leaders were also more concerned with matters of human dignity as well as understanding how some groups may be privileged. Other ethical principles showed no statistical difference.\n\n\nORIGINALITY/VALUE\nThis paper highlights the changes the COVID-19 pandemic has had on leaders' attitudes to ethics.","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE The COVID 19 pandemic has brought into sharp focus the importance of leadership and the ethics of health-care leadership. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of COVID 19 on ethical leadership principles using a validated quantitative survey of NHS leaders to compare pre- and post-pandemic ethical leadership principles. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This study involved a quantitative survey of NHS "leaders". Inclusion criteria included consultants and registrars leading clinical teams, or NHS managers, senior nurses and matrons. The survey was designed as a modification of the Ethical Leadership Questionnaire proposed by Langlois et al. (2013). A modification was made to ask questions from the questionnaire pertaining to before the pandemic and presently. This allowed a comparison of responses and measures of ethical leadership qualities before and after the pandemic. Twenty-three questions were on attitudes pre-pandemic, and 23 were post-pandemic. FINDINGS A total of 79 responses were received. Responses were divided for analysis into those related to an ethics of care dimension, those related to ethics of justice and those related to the ethics of critique. This study has found significant changes in attitudes of health-care leaders with regards to the ethics of critique. Leaders were more likely post-pandemic to speak out against injustice and unfair practices. Leaders were also more concerned with matters of human dignity as well as understanding how some groups may be privileged. Other ethical principles showed no statistical difference. ORIGINALITY/VALUE This paper highlights the changes the COVID-19 pandemic has had on leaders' attitudes to ethics.
疫情优先事项:2019冠状病毒病疫情对医疗行业道德领导力的影响。
目的2019冠状病毒病大流行使人们更加关注领导力的重要性和医疗保健领导力的道德。本研究的目的是通过对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)领导人进行经验证的定量调查,比较疫情前和疫情后的道德领导原则,调查新冠肺炎19对道德领导原则的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究涉及对NHS“领导者”的定量调查。纳入标准包括领导临床团队的顾问和登记员,或NHS经理、高级护士和护士长。该调查是对Langlois等人提出的道德领导力问卷的修改。(2013)。对调查问卷中与疫情前和当前有关的问题进行了修改。这使得我们能够比较疫情前后的应对措施和道德领导力的衡量标准。23个问题是关于疫情前的态度,23个是疫情后的态度。回答被分为与关怀伦理维度相关的回答、与正义伦理相关的回答和与批判伦理相关的答复进行分析。这项研究发现,医疗保健领导人对批评伦理的态度发生了重大变化。疫情后,领导人更有可能公开反对不公正和不公平的做法。领导人也更关心人的尊严问题,以及了解一些群体如何享有特权。其他伦理原则没有统计学差异。原始性/价值观本文强调了新冠肺炎疫情对领导人道德态度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信