Reframing Chinese labour rights: Chinese unionists, pro-labour societies and the nationalist movement in Melbourne, 1900–10

IF 0.6 4区 历史学 Q3 Arts and Humanities
Mei-fen Kuo
{"title":"Reframing Chinese labour rights: Chinese unionists, pro-labour societies and the nationalist movement in Melbourne, 1900–10","authors":"Mei-fen Kuo","doi":"10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.113.0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the early twentieth century, Chinese cabinetmakers' militancy in Melbourne not only secured a fair wage from Chinese employers but also influenced emerging pro-labour societies. The Chinese Cabinetmakers' Union was founded in response to their exclusion from minimum wages law when Chinese cabinetmakers were reimagined as \"coolies\" to emphasise the threat of cheaper Chinese labour. As Australian discriminatory policies increasingly curtailed Chinese workers' rights, the Chinese community was divided in response. The development of Chinese unions and pro-labour societies in Melbourne contrasted with Sydney where the Chinese merchant elite also mobilised against discrimination. The two groups had different perspectives on labour rights, which were being reshaped as part of an emerging Chinese nationalist movement. Chinese unionists in Melbourne participated in the Chinese nationalists' movement through newspapers, public meetings, speeches, donations and outdoor excursions. The alliance of Chinese unionists and the prolabour societies reflected the fact that the Chinese working class in Melbourne demanded worker rights in a complex mix of the \"politics of place,\" embedded in a revolutionary nationalist movement and community organisation.","PeriodicalId":44167,"journal":{"name":"Labour History","volume":"113 1","pages":"133-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5263/LABOURHISTORY.113.0133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the early twentieth century, Chinese cabinetmakers' militancy in Melbourne not only secured a fair wage from Chinese employers but also influenced emerging pro-labour societies. The Chinese Cabinetmakers' Union was founded in response to their exclusion from minimum wages law when Chinese cabinetmakers were reimagined as "coolies" to emphasise the threat of cheaper Chinese labour. As Australian discriminatory policies increasingly curtailed Chinese workers' rights, the Chinese community was divided in response. The development of Chinese unions and pro-labour societies in Melbourne contrasted with Sydney where the Chinese merchant elite also mobilised against discrimination. The two groups had different perspectives on labour rights, which were being reshaped as part of an emerging Chinese nationalist movement. Chinese unionists in Melbourne participated in the Chinese nationalists' movement through newspapers, public meetings, speeches, donations and outdoor excursions. The alliance of Chinese unionists and the prolabour societies reflected the fact that the Chinese working class in Melbourne demanded worker rights in a complex mix of the "politics of place," embedded in a revolutionary nationalist movement and community organisation.
重构华人劳工权利:1900 - 1910年墨尔本华人工会会员、亲劳工社团和民族主义运动
在20世纪早期,墨尔本的中国内阁成员的斗争不仅从中国雇主那里获得了公平的工资,而且还影响了新兴的亲劳工社会。中国内阁工人工会(Chinese Cabinetmakers' Union)的成立,是对中国内阁工人被排除在最低工资法之外的回应。当时,中国内阁工人被重新想象成“苦力”,以强调中国廉价劳动力的威胁。随着澳大利亚的歧视性政策日益削弱中国工人的权利,华人社区对此产生了分歧。墨尔本华人工会和亲劳工社团的发展与悉尼形成鲜明对比,在悉尼,华人商人精英也动员起来反对歧视。这两个团体对劳工权利有着不同的看法,而随着中国民族主义运动的兴起,劳工权利正被重新塑造。墨尔本的华人工会会员通过报纸、公开会议、演讲、捐款和户外远足等方式参与了华人民族主义者的运动。华人工会会员和亲劳工社团的联盟反映了这样一个事实,即墨尔本的华人工人阶级在“地方政治”的复杂混合中要求工人权利,这种政治植根于革命民族主义运动和社区组织中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Labour History
Labour History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信