Keeping an Eye on the Refutation Effect: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Text-Based Interest on Attention Allocation

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
L. Catrysse, Margot Chauliac, V. Donche, D. Gijbels
{"title":"Keeping an Eye on the Refutation Effect: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Text-Based Interest on Attention Allocation","authors":"L. Catrysse, Margot Chauliac, V. Donche, D. Gijbels","doi":"10.1080/0163853X.2022.2142459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined the relationship between refutation texts and attention allocation by focusing on the interaction between important reader-and-text characteristics. Specifically, the authors investigated how prior knowledge and text-based interest affect attention allocation on refutation/control statements, topic, and explanatory and concluding sentences in refutation and nonrefutation texts. We employed eye tracking to monitor the reading behavior of 92 students in higher education. The results revealed that during first-pass regressive reading, nonrefutation-text readers, compared with refutation-text readers, read topic sentences longer, indicating the correct scientific information. Concluding sentences, summarizing the correct scientific information, were reread for longer by refutation-text readers. With increasing prior knowledge, refutation texts were read more slowly than nonrefutation texts during first-pass reading. A higher text-based interest increased rereading time in the refutation text and decreased rereading time in the nonrefutation text. This study advances present knowledge in the field by demonstrating that the interaction between text and reader characteristics affects attention allocation in reading and comprehension.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2142459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examined the relationship between refutation texts and attention allocation by focusing on the interaction between important reader-and-text characteristics. Specifically, the authors investigated how prior knowledge and text-based interest affect attention allocation on refutation/control statements, topic, and explanatory and concluding sentences in refutation and nonrefutation texts. We employed eye tracking to monitor the reading behavior of 92 students in higher education. The results revealed that during first-pass regressive reading, nonrefutation-text readers, compared with refutation-text readers, read topic sentences longer, indicating the correct scientific information. Concluding sentences, summarizing the correct scientific information, were reread for longer by refutation-text readers. With increasing prior knowledge, refutation texts were read more slowly than nonrefutation texts during first-pass reading. A higher text-based interest increased rereading time in the refutation text and decreased rereading time in the nonrefutation text. This study advances present knowledge in the field by demonstrating that the interaction between text and reader characteristics affects attention allocation in reading and comprehension.
关注反驳效应:先验知识和文本兴趣在注意分配中的作用
摘要本研究通过关注读者和文本重要特征之间的相互作用,考察了反驳语篇与注意力分配之间的关系。具体而言,作者研究了先验知识和基于文本的兴趣如何影响在反驳和非反驳文本中对反驳/控制语句、主题以及解释和结论句的注意力分配。我们采用眼动法监测了92名高等教育学生的阅读行为。结果显示,在第一次回归阅读中,非反驳文本阅读者比反驳文本阅读者阅读主题句的时间更长,表明了正确的科学信息。总结正确科学信息的结束语会被阅读反驳文章的读者重读更长时间。随着先验知识的增加,在第一次阅读中,反驳文本的阅读速度比非反驳文本慢。更高的基于文本的兴趣增加了反驳文本的重读时间,减少了非反驳文本的重读时间。本研究通过证明文本和读者特征之间的相互作用会影响阅读和理解中的注意力分配,从而推进了该领域的现有知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信