People who make frequent emergency department visits based on persistence of frequent use in Ontario and Alberta: a retrospective cohort study

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210131
J. Moe, Elle Yuequiao Wang, M. McGregor, M. Schull, K. Dong, B. Holroyd, C. Hohl, E. Grafstein, F. O’Sullivan, J. Trimble, K. McGrail
{"title":"People who make frequent emergency department visits based on persistence of frequent use in Ontario and Alberta: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"J. Moe, Elle Yuequiao Wang, M. McGregor, M. Schull, K. Dong, B. Holroyd, C. Hohl, E. Grafstein, F. O’Sullivan, J. Trimble, K. McGrail","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The factors that underlie persistent frequent visits to the emergency department are poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize people who visit emergency departments frequently in Ontario and Alberta, by number of years of frequent use. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study aimed at capturing information about patients visiting emergency departments in Ontario and Alberta, Canada, from Apr. 1, 2011, to Mar. 31, 2016. We identified people 18 years or older with frequent emergency department use (top 10% of emergency department use) in fiscal year 2015/16, using the Dynamic Cohort from the Canadian Institute of Health Information. We then organized them into subgroups based on the number of years (1 to 5) in which they met the threshold for frequent use over the study period. We characterized subgroups using linked emergency department, hospitalization and mental health–related hospitalization data. Results: We identified 252 737 people in Ontario and 63 238 people in Alberta who made frequent visits to the emergency department. In Ontario and Alberta, 44.3% and 44.7%, respectively, met the threshold for frequent use in only 1 year and made 37.9% and 38.5% of visits; 6.8% and 8.2% met the threshold for frequent use over 5 years and made 11.9% and 13.2% of visits. Many characteristics followed gradients based on persistence of frequent use: as years of frequent visits increased (1 to 5 years), people had more comorbidities, homelessness, rural residence, annual emergency department visits, alcohol- and substance use–related presentations, mental health hospitalizations and instances of leaving hospital against medical advice. Interpretation: Higher levels of comorbidities, mental health issues, substance use and rural residence were seen with increasing years of frequent emergency department use. Interventions upstream and in the emergency department must address unmet needs, including services for substance use and social supports.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The factors that underlie persistent frequent visits to the emergency department are poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize people who visit emergency departments frequently in Ontario and Alberta, by number of years of frequent use. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study aimed at capturing information about patients visiting emergency departments in Ontario and Alberta, Canada, from Apr. 1, 2011, to Mar. 31, 2016. We identified people 18 years or older with frequent emergency department use (top 10% of emergency department use) in fiscal year 2015/16, using the Dynamic Cohort from the Canadian Institute of Health Information. We then organized them into subgroups based on the number of years (1 to 5) in which they met the threshold for frequent use over the study period. We characterized subgroups using linked emergency department, hospitalization and mental health–related hospitalization data. Results: We identified 252 737 people in Ontario and 63 238 people in Alberta who made frequent visits to the emergency department. In Ontario and Alberta, 44.3% and 44.7%, respectively, met the threshold for frequent use in only 1 year and made 37.9% and 38.5% of visits; 6.8% and 8.2% met the threshold for frequent use over 5 years and made 11.9% and 13.2% of visits. Many characteristics followed gradients based on persistence of frequent use: as years of frequent visits increased (1 to 5 years), people had more comorbidities, homelessness, rural residence, annual emergency department visits, alcohol- and substance use–related presentations, mental health hospitalizations and instances of leaving hospital against medical advice. Interpretation: Higher levels of comorbidities, mental health issues, substance use and rural residence were seen with increasing years of frequent emergency department use. Interventions upstream and in the emergency department must address unmet needs, including services for substance use and social supports.
安大略省和阿尔伯塔省基于持续频繁使用的频繁急诊科就诊的人:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:持续频繁到急诊科就诊的原因尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过频繁使用的年数来描述安大略省和阿尔伯塔省频繁访问急诊部门的人的特征。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,旨在获取2011年4月1日至2016年3月31日在加拿大安大略省和阿尔伯塔省急诊科就诊的患者信息。我们使用加拿大健康信息研究所的动态队列,确定了2015/16财政年度频繁使用急诊科的18岁或以上的人(急诊科使用的前10%)。然后,我们根据他们在研究期间达到频繁使用阈值的年数(1至5年)将他们分成亚组。我们使用关联的急诊科、住院和精神健康相关住院数据来特征亚组。结果:我们在安大略省确定了252 737人,在阿尔伯塔省确定了63 238人,他们经常去急诊室。在安大略省和阿尔伯塔省,分别有44.3%和44.7%的人在1年内达到频繁使用的门槛,占就诊人数的37.9%和38.5%;6.8%和8.2%的人在5年内达到经常使用的阈值,占访问次数的11.9%和13.2%。许多特征遵循基于持续频繁使用的梯度:随着频繁就诊年数的增加(1至5年),人们有更多的合并症,无家可归,农村居住,每年急诊就诊,酒精和物质使用相关的表现,精神健康住院和不遵医嘱出院的情况。解释:随着急诊科使用频率的增加,合并症、精神健康问题、药物使用和农村居住的水平也越来越高。上游和急诊科的干预措施必须解决未满足的需求,包括药物使用和社会支持服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信