{"title":"Grensk Culture in Eastern Belarus: The Current State of Research","authors":"Aliaksandr U. Kolasau","doi":"10.15181/AB.V25I0.1828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the main range of problems of Grensk culture in the Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic in the Upper Dnieper region. At present, the understanding of the ways and mechanisms of the formation and the time of habitation of members of this ancient culture are rather debatable. Interpretations of the sources have resulted in two completely different research approaches in terms of methodology, bringing together supporters of the indigenous (U. Budzko, V. Kapytsin, A. Kalechyts, G. Sinitsyna, etc) or migration (L. Zaliznyak, U. Ksiandzou, A. Sorokin, etc) ways of the emergence and the development of Grensk culture. It is impossible to understand the essence of the ‘Grensk question’ without considering the nature of its origin, the problem looked at in this article. Key words: Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, Grensk culture, eastern Belarus, Upper Dnieper region, asymmetrical shouldered points, Ienevo culture, Pesochny Rov culture. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v25i0.1828","PeriodicalId":29741,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia Baltica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia Baltica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15181/AB.V25I0.1828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The article deals with the main range of problems of Grensk culture in the Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic in the Upper Dnieper region. At present, the understanding of the ways and mechanisms of the formation and the time of habitation of members of this ancient culture are rather debatable. Interpretations of the sources have resulted in two completely different research approaches in terms of methodology, bringing together supporters of the indigenous (U. Budzko, V. Kapytsin, A. Kalechyts, G. Sinitsyna, etc) or migration (L. Zaliznyak, U. Ksiandzou, A. Sorokin, etc) ways of the emergence and the development of Grensk culture. It is impossible to understand the essence of the ‘Grensk question’ without considering the nature of its origin, the problem looked at in this article. Key words: Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic, Grensk culture, eastern Belarus, Upper Dnieper region, asymmetrical shouldered points, Ienevo culture, Pesochny Rov culture. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v25i0.1828
本文论述了上第聂伯河地区最后旧石器时代和中石器时代格伦斯克文化的主要问题范围。目前,对这一古老文化成员的形成方式、机制和居住时间的认识尚有争议。对资料来源的解释产生了两种完全不同的研究方法,将支持格伦斯克文化产生和发展的本土(U. Budzko, V. Kapytsin, A. Kalechyts, G. Sinitsyna等)或移民(L. Zaliznyak, U. Ksiandzou, A. Sorokin等)方式的人聚集在一起。要理解“格伦斯克问题”的本质,就不可能不考虑其起源的本质,这是本文所研究的问题。关键词:晚期旧石器时代和中石器时代,格伦斯克文化,白俄罗斯东部,上第聂伯河地区,不对称肩点,Ienevo文化,Pesochny Rov文化。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v25i0.1828