When and Why Does Momentum Work—and Not Work?

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Berkin
{"title":"When and Why Does Momentum Work—and Not Work?","authors":"A. Berkin","doi":"10.3905/joi.2021.1.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a history of empirical success, momentum became widely adopted by investment managers despite a lack of consensus on why it worked. Then in the 2000s, momentum failed, with negative returns and sharp downturns. This article examines behavioral, market friction, and risk-based explanations for why momentum works. The author also pinpoints several circumstances when momentum fails, including post-decimalization, after bear markets, during volatile markets, and when value stocks outperform. He discusses how the three explanations of momentum’s behavior enable us to understand why momentum has failed and applies these conditions to understand momentum’s failure during the 2000s. This article thus provides guidance into when and why momentum works or doesn’t work, which will help investors decide how to proceed going forward. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, analysis of individual factors/risk premia, legal/regulatory/public policy, exchanges/markets/clearinghouses, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ The success of momentum can be explained by a variety of behavioral, market friction, and risk considerations. ▪ Under certain conditions, momentum will tend to not work, including post-decimalization, after bear markets, during periods of volatility, and when value stocks outperform. ▪ These conditions were more prevalent in the 2000s, helping to explain momentum’s weak performance in those years and providing investors with guidance going forward.","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2021.1.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With a history of empirical success, momentum became widely adopted by investment managers despite a lack of consensus on why it worked. Then in the 2000s, momentum failed, with negative returns and sharp downturns. This article examines behavioral, market friction, and risk-based explanations for why momentum works. The author also pinpoints several circumstances when momentum fails, including post-decimalization, after bear markets, during volatile markets, and when value stocks outperform. He discusses how the three explanations of momentum’s behavior enable us to understand why momentum has failed and applies these conditions to understand momentum’s failure during the 2000s. This article thus provides guidance into when and why momentum works or doesn’t work, which will help investors decide how to proceed going forward. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, analysis of individual factors/risk premia, legal/regulatory/public policy, exchanges/markets/clearinghouses, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ The success of momentum can be explained by a variety of behavioral, market friction, and risk considerations. ▪ Under certain conditions, momentum will tend to not work, including post-decimalization, after bear markets, during periods of volatility, and when value stocks outperform. ▪ These conditions were more prevalent in the 2000s, helping to explain momentum’s weak performance in those years and providing investors with guidance going forward.
动量何时起作用,为什么不起作用?
随着经验成功的历史,动量被投资经理广泛采用,尽管对其为何有效缺乏共识。但在21世纪头十年,这种势头失败了,回报率为负,经济急剧下滑。本文考察了行为、市场摩擦和基于风险的解释,以解释动量为何起作用。作者还指出了动力失效的几种情况,包括十进制之后、熊市之后、市场波动期间以及价值型股票表现优异的时候。他讨论了动量行为的三种解释如何使我们理解动量失败的原因,并应用这些条件来理解本世纪头十年动量的失败。因此,本文提供了关于何时以及为什么动量起作用或不起作用的指导,这将帮助投资者决定如何继续前进。主题:证券分析和估值、个人因素/风险溢价分析、法律/监管/公共政策、交易所/市场/清算所、绩效评估。关键发现▪动量的成功可以通过各种行为、市场摩擦和风险因素来解释。在某些情况下,动量倾向于不起作用,包括十进制之后,熊市之后,在波动期间,以及价值股表现优于股票的时候。这些情况在本世纪头十年更为普遍,有助于解释那些年动量表现疲弱的原因,并为投资者提供了未来的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信