Reports from the Field: Eneq's Ke:s - Kake:ketikuaq Omae:qnomene:wak ("The Menominee Have Spoken"): Mentorship and Collaboration in an Indigenous Community

Christine K. Lemley, J. Teller
{"title":"Reports from the Field: Eneq's Ke:s - Kake:ketikuaq Omae:qnomene:wak (\"The Menominee Have Spoken\"): Mentorship and Collaboration in an Indigenous Community","authors":"Christine K. Lemley, J. Teller","doi":"10.1353/jaie.2014.a798526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Research involving Indigenous peoples is political, historically situated, contextually positioned, and involves people with multiple and sometimes conflicting interests. This Report from the Field toils the story of an intersection of two worlds, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, and has been written for Indigenous, non-Indigenous and academic communities. In this article, a non-Indigenous researcher revisits how she informed and confirmed ethical responsibilities and protocols of non-Indigenous researchers completing research in Indigenous communities. Drawing on Critical Indigenous Research Methodologies, this account frames a journey of a non-Indigenous researcher and an Indigenous mentor as they enacted notions of relationality, respect, responsibility, reciprocity and accountability in an Indigenous community to gain trust, rapport and access to the tribal community. The article further examines how important it is for non-Indigenous researchers to respect the selfdetermination and sovereignty of Indigenous communities.","PeriodicalId":90572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American Indian education","volume":"53 1","pages":"42 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American Indian education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jaie.2014.a798526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Research involving Indigenous peoples is political, historically situated, contextually positioned, and involves people with multiple and sometimes conflicting interests. This Report from the Field toils the story of an intersection of two worlds, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, and has been written for Indigenous, non-Indigenous and academic communities. In this article, a non-Indigenous researcher revisits how she informed and confirmed ethical responsibilities and protocols of non-Indigenous researchers completing research in Indigenous communities. Drawing on Critical Indigenous Research Methodologies, this account frames a journey of a non-Indigenous researcher and an Indigenous mentor as they enacted notions of relationality, respect, responsibility, reciprocity and accountability in an Indigenous community to gain trust, rapport and access to the tribal community. The article further examines how important it is for non-Indigenous researchers to respect the selfdetermination and sovereignty of Indigenous communities.
实地报告:Eneq的Ke:s - Kake:ketikuaq Omae:qnomene:wak(“Menominee Have speak”):土著社区的指导与合作
摘要:涉及原住民族的研究具有政治性、历史地位、语境定位,涉及到具有多重利益、有时甚至是相互冲突的人。《实地报告》讲述了土著和非土著两个世界的交集,是为土著、非土著和学术界撰写的。在这篇文章中,一位非土著研究人员回顾了她如何告知和确认非土著研究人员在土著社区完成研究的伦理责任和规程。本书借鉴了关键的土著研究方法,描述了一名非土著研究员和一名土著导师在土著社区制定关系、尊重、责任、互惠和问责等概念,以获得信任、融洽关系和进入部落社区的过程。文章进一步探讨了非土著研究人员尊重土著社区的自决和主权的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书