{"title":"Editorial Foreword","authors":"M. Aung-Thwin","doi":"10.1017/S0022463423000437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ritual, power, and ‘production’ are some of the themes that connect the six research articles featured in this issue. Alexandra Kaloyanides explores ritual and power through a study of the highly ornamented Burmese manuscript known as the Kammavacā, an authoritative text that is conventionally used in important monastic ceremonies. The article examines the process through which the late eighteenth and nineteenth-century Kammavacā emerges as a standardised ritual object and for what it reveals about the local political-economic conditions of Myanmar’s last kingdom, the Konbaung dynasty. Focusing on the visual and material features of over four dozen Burmese Kammavācamanuscripts, the article suggests that the production, decoration, and circulation of these texts constitutes an attempt by the royal court to mobilise protective ‘militarised’ spirits in the wake of an advancing British occupational force that threatened to overwhelm the kingdom. Where Kaloyanides’ article examines the harnessing and distribution of spiritual power by the royal centre, our next article by Edoardo Siani expands this perspective to consider the appropriation of cosmological ideas and ritual practices as they relate to expressions of everyday resistance in contemporary Thailand. Based on ethnohistorical fieldwork conducted between the coup of 2014 and the death of King Bhumibol in 2016, Siani’s study examines how divination is utilised by different stakeholders in contemporary Thai society as expressions of contestation and dissent. While acknowledging that cosmological references and divination practices are often reflective of conservative stakeholders, Siani suggests that Thai diviners continue to provide political actors across the social landscape with the spiritual vocabulary and ritual means to contest and produce sovereign claims to power. Shifting to the sixteenth-century world of the Spanish Philippines, Stephanie Joy Mawson examines a similar contestation between legal, religious, and ritual worlds via 98 Inquisition cases concerning ‘folk magic’ or hechicería, a juridical category denoting a minor religious infraction. Her examination of the interaction of Spanish and Filipino folk practices complicates our understanding of what constitutes the boundary between the local and the foreign by pointing out that the Spanish came to the Philippines with their own ‘folk magic’ practices that intermixed with pre-existing customs. Similar to Siani’s findings in contemporary Thailand, Mawson’s research suggests that these rituals were adopted by elites and commoners alike, drawing the attention and ire of the ruling authorities. While the article illustrates the way Spanish-Mexican folk knowledge was appropriated and produced by local practitioners, this research also considers how Asian botanical, medicinal, and spiritual knowledge was incorporated into Spanish understandings of folk magic. Colonial authorities struggled to repress hechicería practices within the Spanish community Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 54(2), pp 173–174 June 2023. 173","PeriodicalId":46213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"54 1","pages":"173 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463423000437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ritual, power, and ‘production’ are some of the themes that connect the six research articles featured in this issue. Alexandra Kaloyanides explores ritual and power through a study of the highly ornamented Burmese manuscript known as the Kammavacā, an authoritative text that is conventionally used in important monastic ceremonies. The article examines the process through which the late eighteenth and nineteenth-century Kammavacā emerges as a standardised ritual object and for what it reveals about the local political-economic conditions of Myanmar’s last kingdom, the Konbaung dynasty. Focusing on the visual and material features of over four dozen Burmese Kammavācamanuscripts, the article suggests that the production, decoration, and circulation of these texts constitutes an attempt by the royal court to mobilise protective ‘militarised’ spirits in the wake of an advancing British occupational force that threatened to overwhelm the kingdom. Where Kaloyanides’ article examines the harnessing and distribution of spiritual power by the royal centre, our next article by Edoardo Siani expands this perspective to consider the appropriation of cosmological ideas and ritual practices as they relate to expressions of everyday resistance in contemporary Thailand. Based on ethnohistorical fieldwork conducted between the coup of 2014 and the death of King Bhumibol in 2016, Siani’s study examines how divination is utilised by different stakeholders in contemporary Thai society as expressions of contestation and dissent. While acknowledging that cosmological references and divination practices are often reflective of conservative stakeholders, Siani suggests that Thai diviners continue to provide political actors across the social landscape with the spiritual vocabulary and ritual means to contest and produce sovereign claims to power. Shifting to the sixteenth-century world of the Spanish Philippines, Stephanie Joy Mawson examines a similar contestation between legal, religious, and ritual worlds via 98 Inquisition cases concerning ‘folk magic’ or hechicería, a juridical category denoting a minor religious infraction. Her examination of the interaction of Spanish and Filipino folk practices complicates our understanding of what constitutes the boundary between the local and the foreign by pointing out that the Spanish came to the Philippines with their own ‘folk magic’ practices that intermixed with pre-existing customs. Similar to Siani’s findings in contemporary Thailand, Mawson’s research suggests that these rituals were adopted by elites and commoners alike, drawing the attention and ire of the ruling authorities. While the article illustrates the way Spanish-Mexican folk knowledge was appropriated and produced by local practitioners, this research also considers how Asian botanical, medicinal, and spiritual knowledge was incorporated into Spanish understandings of folk magic. Colonial authorities struggled to repress hechicería practices within the Spanish community Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 54(2), pp 173–174 June 2023. 173
仪式、权力和“生产”是本期六篇研究文章的主题。Alexandra Kaloyanides通过研究被称为Kammavacā的装饰精美的缅甸手稿来探索仪式和权力,Kammavachā是一种传统上用于重要修道院仪式的权威文本。这篇文章考察了18世纪末和19世纪的Kammavacā作为一个标准化的仪式对象出现的过程,以及它揭示了缅甸最后一个王国孔包王朝的当地政治经济条件。文章聚焦于40多个缅甸Kammavācamanuscript的视觉和物质特征,认为这些文本的制作、装饰和流通构成了皇家宫廷在英国职业力量不断发展、威胁到王国的情况下动员保护性“军事化”精神的一种尝试。Kaloyanides的文章探讨了皇家中心对精神力量的利用和分配,我们的下一篇文章Edoardo Siani扩展了这一观点,考虑了宇宙学思想和仪式实践的挪用,因为它们与当代泰国日常抵抗的表达有关。基于2014年政变至2016年普密蓬国王去世期间进行的民族历史田野调查,Siani的研究考察了当代泰国社会中不同利益相关者如何利用占卜来表达争议和异议。Siani承认,宇宙学参考和占卜实践往往反映了保守的利益相关者,但他建议,泰国占卜师继续为整个社会的政治参与者提供精神词汇和仪式手段,以竞争和产生对权力的主权主张。转移到16世纪的西班牙-菲律宾世界,Stephanie Joy Mawson通过98起宗教裁判所案件探讨了法律、宗教和仪式世界之间的类似争论,这些案件涉及“民间魔法”或hechicería,这是一个表示轻微宗教违法的司法类别。她对西班牙和菲律宾民间习俗相互作用的研究使我们对当地和外国之间界限的理解变得复杂,因为她指出,西班牙人来到菲律宾时,他们自己的“民间魔术”习俗与预先存在的习俗交织在一起。与Siani在当代泰国的发现类似,Mawson的研究表明,这些仪式被精英和平民所采用,引起了统治当局的注意和愤怒。虽然这篇文章说明了西班牙-墨西哥民间知识是如何被当地从业者挪用和产生的,但本研究也考虑了亚洲植物、医学和精神知识是如何融入西班牙对民间魔法的理解中的。殖民当局努力镇压西班牙社区内的hechicería做法,《东南亚研究杂志》,54(2),第173–174页,2023年6月。173
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Southeast Asian Studies is one of the principal outlets for scholarly articles on Southeast Asia (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, East Timor, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam). Embracing a wide range of academic disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, the journal publishes manuscripts oriented toward a scholarly readership but written to be accessible to non-specialists. The extensive book review section includes works in Southeast Asian languages. Published for the History Department, National University of Singapore.