Interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: when, how and why?

C. Pinelli, Rocco Guerrisi, C. Brusadelli, V. Artuso, H. S. Majd, G. Bogani, F. Ghezzi, J. Casarin
{"title":"Interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: when, how and why?","authors":"C. Pinelli, Rocco Guerrisi, C. Brusadelli, V. Artuso, H. S. Majd, G. Bogani, F. Ghezzi, J. Casarin","doi":"10.21037/GPM-20-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecological malignancy in developed areas. More than two-thirds of women with ovarian cancer have advanced disease at diagnosis. The standard treatment for advanced stage has been primary debulking surgery (PDS), aimed to achieve the complete resection of macroscopic disease, followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. The absence of residual tumor after surgical cytoreduction represents the most significant prognostic factor. The feasibility of complete cytoreduction depends on the resectability of the tumor and the operability of patients, respectively related to the extension of disease and patients’ comorbidities. For cases where PDS is not feasible for these reasons, an alternative strategy was developed in the last decades, the so called interval debulking surgery (IDS). This pathway consists of three or four courses of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by IDS and a completion of other three courses of platinum-based chemotherapy. Actually, it represents an effective option to improve the rate of women who could benefit of a cytoreductive surgery. In this review we critically explore the current literature and report the evidence about the role of IDS in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, focusing on pros and cons of both strategies (PDS and IDS) and patients’ selection process.","PeriodicalId":92781,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and pelvic medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and pelvic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/GPM-20-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecological malignancy in developed areas. More than two-thirds of women with ovarian cancer have advanced disease at diagnosis. The standard treatment for advanced stage has been primary debulking surgery (PDS), aimed to achieve the complete resection of macroscopic disease, followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. The absence of residual tumor after surgical cytoreduction represents the most significant prognostic factor. The feasibility of complete cytoreduction depends on the resectability of the tumor and the operability of patients, respectively related to the extension of disease and patients’ comorbidities. For cases where PDS is not feasible for these reasons, an alternative strategy was developed in the last decades, the so called interval debulking surgery (IDS). This pathway consists of three or four courses of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by IDS and a completion of other three courses of platinum-based chemotherapy. Actually, it represents an effective option to improve the rate of women who could benefit of a cytoreductive surgery. In this review we critically explore the current literature and report the evidence about the role of IDS in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, focusing on pros and cons of both strategies (PDS and IDS) and patients’ selection process.
晚期卵巢癌间歇减体积手术:何时、如何、为何?
卵巢癌是发达地区最致命的妇科恶性肿瘤。超过三分之二患有卵巢癌的女性在诊断时病情已经进展。晚期的标准治疗是原发性减体积手术(PDS),目的是实现宏观疾病的完全切除,然后是铂基化疗。手术后肿瘤的残留是最重要的预后因素。完全细胞减少的可行性取决于肿瘤的可切除性和患者的可操作性,分别与疾病的延伸和患者的合并症有关。对于由于这些原因PDS不可行的病例,在过去的几十年里,一种替代策略被开发出来,即所谓的间隔减压手术(IDS)。该途径包括3或4个疗程的新辅助铂基化疗,随后进行IDS,并完成其他3个疗程的铂基化疗。事实上,它代表了一个有效的选择来提高女性从细胞减少手术中获益的比率。在这篇综述中,我们批判性地探讨了目前的文献,并报告了IDS在晚期卵巢癌治疗中的作用的证据,重点讨论了两种策略(PDS和IDS)的优缺点以及患者的选择过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信