Outcomes of primary total joint arthroplasty in patients with a history of solid organ transplantation, a single institution analysis

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Paul M. Alvarez, C. Curatolo, M. N. Desai, A. Malik, Logan J Roebke, Matthew Pigott
{"title":"Outcomes of primary total joint arthroplasty in patients with a history of solid organ transplantation, a single institution analysis","authors":"Paul M. Alvarez, C. Curatolo, M. N. Desai, A. Malik, Logan J Roebke, Matthew Pigott","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An increasing number of patients with a history of solid organ transplantation (SOT) are presenting for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The primary aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes after primary total joint arthroplasty in patients with a history of SOT compared to matched controls. Methods: We performed a review of prospectively collected data on consecutive adult patients with a history of SOT undergoing TJA from January 2014 to January 2021. Pearson-Chi square tests were used to compare differences in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics between SOT and matched controls. Multi-variate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether patients who had a prior SOT were at higher risk of experiencing post-operative complications, readmissions, reoperations, longer length of stay and non-home discharges after primary TJA. Results: A total of 81 operations met inclusion criteria which were compared to 82 age matched controls without a history of SOT. Patients with a history of SOT were more likely to require a hospitalization greater than 2 days compared to the control group (n=63, 77.8% vs. n=16, 19.5%; P=0.011), had an increased risk of hyperkalemia (n=15, 18.5% vs. n=1, 1.2%; P=0.049), and any post-operative complication (n=55, 67.9% vs. n=21, 25.6%; P=0.025). Conclusions: Despite the increased risk of acute post-operative complications and longer hospital stays, primary TJA has been shown to be a safe and effective option for treatment of DJD or AVN in patients with a history of SOT when completed via a multi-disciplinary approach. Level of Evidence: Retrospective Analysis, Level IV.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"170 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of patients with a history of solid organ transplantation (SOT) are presenting for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The primary aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes after primary total joint arthroplasty in patients with a history of SOT compared to matched controls. Methods: We performed a review of prospectively collected data on consecutive adult patients with a history of SOT undergoing TJA from January 2014 to January 2021. Pearson-Chi square tests were used to compare differences in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics between SOT and matched controls. Multi-variate logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether patients who had a prior SOT were at higher risk of experiencing post-operative complications, readmissions, reoperations, longer length of stay and non-home discharges after primary TJA. Results: A total of 81 operations met inclusion criteria which were compared to 82 age matched controls without a history of SOT. Patients with a history of SOT were more likely to require a hospitalization greater than 2 days compared to the control group (n=63, 77.8% vs. n=16, 19.5%; P=0.011), had an increased risk of hyperkalemia (n=15, 18.5% vs. n=1, 1.2%; P=0.049), and any post-operative complication (n=55, 67.9% vs. n=21, 25.6%; P=0.025). Conclusions: Despite the increased risk of acute post-operative complications and longer hospital stays, primary TJA has been shown to be a safe and effective option for treatment of DJD or AVN in patients with a history of SOT when completed via a multi-disciplinary approach. Level of Evidence: Retrospective Analysis, Level IV.
有实体器官移植史的患者初次全关节置换术的结果,一项单一机构分析
背景:越来越多有实体器官移植(SOT)病史的患者正在接受全关节置换术(TJA)。本研究的主要目的是与匹配的对照组相比,评估有SOT病史的患者在初次全关节置换术后的临床结果。方法:我们对2014年1月至2021年1月接受TJA的连续有SOT病史的成年患者的前瞻性收集数据进行了回顾。Pearson卡方检验用于比较SOT和匹配对照组在基线人口统计学和临床特征方面的差异。使用多变量逻辑回归分析来评估既往有SOT的患者在原发性TJA后是否有更高的术后并发症、再次入院、再次手术、更长的住院时间和非家庭出院风险。结果:共有81例手术符合纳入标准,与82例没有SOT病史的年龄匹配的对照组进行了比较。与对照组相比,有SOT病史的患者更有可能需要住院2天以上(n=63,77.8%vs.n=16,19.5%;P=0.011),患高钾血症的风险增加(n=15,18.5%vs.n=1,1.2%;P=0.049),以及任何术后并发症(n=55,67.9%vs.n=21,25.6%;P=0.025)。结论:尽管术后急性并发症的风险增加,住院时间延长,但通过多学科方法完成原发性TJA治疗有SOT病史的患者的DJD或AVN已被证明是一种安全有效的选择。证据级别:回顾性分析,四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信