Clinical and Forensic Toxicological Aspects of Synthetic Cannabinoids: A Review and Update

K. Soltaninejad
{"title":"Clinical and Forensic Toxicological Aspects of Synthetic Cannabinoids: A Review and Update","authors":"K. Soltaninejad","doi":"10.22038/APJMT.2020.16748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nBackground: Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are highly abused of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS). SCs has known under street names such as “Spice”, “herbal incense” and “K2”, act as endocannabinoids (CB) receptor full agonists and have unpredictable toxicity and abuse potential. This narrative review was conducted to update the present evidence about the clinical and forensic toxicological aspects of SCs. \nMethods: PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar  databases from 2015 to 2020 (up to 1st May) were searched using the terms “synthetic cannabinoids”, “synthetic cannabimimetics”, “ K2”,  “Spice”, “clinical toxicology”, “forensic toxicology”, “poisoning”, “toxicity”, “abuse” , “addiction “analysis” and “determination” to identify the relevant articles. In addition, a manual search of reference lists of the retrieved articles was conducted. \nResults: ADB-FUBINACA , XRL-11, 5F-ADB, 5F-PB-22, MDMB-CHMICA and MMB-2201 are the commonly reported SCs analogues among acute toxicities and fatalities cases. Adverse reactions and toxic effects of SCs includes psychoneurological, cardiovascular, renal and gastrointestinal involvements. Deaths related to SCs have been reported due to stroke and cardiac dysrhythmia. Analysis of SCs in biological samples in the clinical and postmortem setting needs sophisticated analytical instruments. Liquid gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has a crucial role for detection of SCs and their metabolites in biological samples. Conclusion: Unlike natural cannabinoids, the SCs abuse/poisoning has serious and life-threatening effects in abuser. Also, analysis of SCs is not included in the routine forensic urine drug testing. Therefore, suitable measures of informing the public and health care professionals for prevention of SCs abuse are recommended.","PeriodicalId":30463,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":"9 1","pages":"108-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/APJMT.2020.16748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Background: Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are highly abused of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS). SCs has known under street names such as “Spice”, “herbal incense” and “K2”, act as endocannabinoids (CB) receptor full agonists and have unpredictable toxicity and abuse potential. This narrative review was conducted to update the present evidence about the clinical and forensic toxicological aspects of SCs. Methods: PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar  databases from 2015 to 2020 (up to 1st May) were searched using the terms “synthetic cannabinoids”, “synthetic cannabimimetics”, “ K2”,  “Spice”, “clinical toxicology”, “forensic toxicology”, “poisoning”, “toxicity”, “abuse” , “addiction “analysis” and “determination” to identify the relevant articles. In addition, a manual search of reference lists of the retrieved articles was conducted. Results: ADB-FUBINACA , XRL-11, 5F-ADB, 5F-PB-22, MDMB-CHMICA and MMB-2201 are the commonly reported SCs analogues among acute toxicities and fatalities cases. Adverse reactions and toxic effects of SCs includes psychoneurological, cardiovascular, renal and gastrointestinal involvements. Deaths related to SCs have been reported due to stroke and cardiac dysrhythmia. Analysis of SCs in biological samples in the clinical and postmortem setting needs sophisticated analytical instruments. Liquid gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has a crucial role for detection of SCs and their metabolites in biological samples. Conclusion: Unlike natural cannabinoids, the SCs abuse/poisoning has serious and life-threatening effects in abuser. Also, analysis of SCs is not included in the routine forensic urine drug testing. Therefore, suitable measures of informing the public and health care professionals for prevention of SCs abuse are recommended.
合成大麻素的临床和法医毒理学方面:综述和更新
摘要背景:合成大麻素在新型精神活性物质中被高度滥用。SC被称为“香料”、“草药香”和“K2”,作为内源性大麻素(CB)受体全激动剂,具有不可预测的毒性和滥用潜力。进行这篇叙述性综述是为了更新关于SC的临床和法医毒理学方面的现有证据。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus和Google Scholar数据库2015年至2020年(截至5月1日),使用术语“合成大麻素”、“合成模拟大麻素类药物”、“K2”、“香料”、“临床毒理学”、“法医毒理学”、《中毒》、“毒性”、“滥用”、“成瘾”分析和“确定”来识别相关文章。此外,还对检索到的文章的参考文献列表进行了手动检索。结果:ADB-FUBINACA、XRL-11、5F-ADB、5F-PB-22、MDMB-CHMICA和MMB-2201是急性毒性和死亡病例中常见的SCs类似物。SC的不良反应和毒性作用包括精神神经、心血管、肾脏和胃肠道方面的影响。据报道,与SCs相关的死亡是由于中风和心律失常。在临床和尸检环境中分析生物样本中的SCs需要复杂的分析仪器。液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)在检测生物样品中的SCs及其代谢产物方面发挥着至关重要的作用。结论:与天然大麻素不同,SCs滥用/中毒对施虐者具有严重的威胁生命的影响。此外,SCs的分析不包括在常规的法医尿液药物测试中。因此,建议采取适当措施,向公众和卫生保健专业人员通报预防SCs滥用的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia Pacific Journal of Medical Toxicology (APJMT) aims to expand the knowledge of medical toxicology and tries to provide reliable information in this field for medical and healthcare professionals. APJMT mainly focuses on research related to medical toxicology issues in the Asia Pacific region and publishes articles on clinical and epidemiological aspects of toxicology, poisonings emergency care, addiction, drug interactions and adverse effects. The journal accepts and welcomes high quality papers in the form of original articles and rarely review articles, case reports and scientific letters relevant to medical practice in toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信