Challenging dominant notions of participation and protection through a co-led disabled young researcher study

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Geraldine Brady, A. Franklin
{"title":"Challenging dominant notions of participation and protection through a co-led disabled young researcher study","authors":"Geraldine Brady, A. Franklin","doi":"10.1108/JCS-03-2019-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn the UK, the Children and Families Act aims to create one assessment process for children with special educational needs or disability, through Education, Health and Care Plans. It also aims for greater participation from children and young people in decisions about their own lives. Current evidence suggests that children’s needs and desires across education, health and social care are not being fully met, partly because adult agendas drive policy, practice and standards of care. Furthermore, little attention is paid to the way in which disabled children and young people are included either within decisions about their own support or within research processes. The purpose of this paper is to present a research process designed to address these issues.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSix disabled young people co-led this participatory research project; for the first time, disabled young people had the opportunity to define a research agenda which spoke to what “quality” might look like in planning for their own future and that of other disabled children and young people.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper presents findings from this process, addressing important ethical issues relevant for policy, practice and research, identified through this rights based, collaborative way of working in partnership. Three key issues were identified and are explored here. They include first, tensions between young people becoming leaders and dominant ideas about safeguarding and child protection; second, being empowered through engagement within the project yet restricted in other areas of personal life and, finally, the emotional impact on new researchers of gathering evidence of a continuing lack of autonomy for disabled children and young people. We argue that challenging dominant notions concerning the participation and protection of disabled children is required in order to ensure that they access their right to be decision-makers in their own lives, and to being empowered within research processes.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first disabled young people-led study to investigate quality and rights for disabled children and young people using this rights-based methodology.\n","PeriodicalId":45244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childrens Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JCS-03-2019-0016","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childrens Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-03-2019-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose In the UK, the Children and Families Act aims to create one assessment process for children with special educational needs or disability, through Education, Health and Care Plans. It also aims for greater participation from children and young people in decisions about their own lives. Current evidence suggests that children’s needs and desires across education, health and social care are not being fully met, partly because adult agendas drive policy, practice and standards of care. Furthermore, little attention is paid to the way in which disabled children and young people are included either within decisions about their own support or within research processes. The purpose of this paper is to present a research process designed to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach Six disabled young people co-led this participatory research project; for the first time, disabled young people had the opportunity to define a research agenda which spoke to what “quality” might look like in planning for their own future and that of other disabled children and young people. Findings This paper presents findings from this process, addressing important ethical issues relevant for policy, practice and research, identified through this rights based, collaborative way of working in partnership. Three key issues were identified and are explored here. They include first, tensions between young people becoming leaders and dominant ideas about safeguarding and child protection; second, being empowered through engagement within the project yet restricted in other areas of personal life and, finally, the emotional impact on new researchers of gathering evidence of a continuing lack of autonomy for disabled children and young people. We argue that challenging dominant notions concerning the participation and protection of disabled children is required in order to ensure that they access their right to be decision-makers in their own lives, and to being empowered within research processes. Originality/value This is the first disabled young people-led study to investigate quality and rights for disabled children and young people using this rights-based methodology.
通过一项共同领导的残疾青年研究员研究,挑战参与和保护的主流观念
目的:在联合王国,《儿童和家庭法》旨在通过教育、保健和护理计划,为有特殊教育需要或残疾的儿童建立一个评估程序。它还旨在让儿童和年轻人更多地参与决定自己的生活。目前的证据表明,儿童在教育、卫生和社会护理方面的需求和愿望没有得到充分满足,部分原因是成人议程推动了护理的政策、做法和标准。此外,很少注意残疾儿童和青年如何被纳入关于他们自己的支持的决定或研究过程中。本文的目的是提出一个旨在解决这些问题的研究过程。设计/方法/方法6位残疾青年共同领导这个参与式研究项目;残疾青年第一次有机会确定一个研究议程,讨论在规划他们自己和其他残疾儿童和青年的未来时“质量”可能是什么样子。本文介绍了这一过程的结果,解决了与政策、实践和研究相关的重要伦理问题,这些问题是通过这种基于权利的合作方式确定的。本文确定并探讨了三个关键问题。首先,成为领袖的年轻人与保护儿童的主流观念之间的紧张关系;第二,通过参与项目而获得权力,但在个人生活的其他领域受到限制,最后,收集残疾儿童和年轻人持续缺乏自主权的证据对新研究人员的情感影响。我们认为,需要挑战有关残疾儿童参与和保护的主流观念,以确保他们在自己的生活中获得成为决策者的权利,并在研究过程中获得权力。独创性/价值这是第一个以残疾青年为主导的研究,使用这种基于权利的方法来调查残疾儿童和青年的质量和权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信