Internal evaluation in the faculties affiliated to zanjan university of medical sciences: Quality assurance of medical science education based on institutional accreditation

A. Abdanipour, Farhad Ramezani-badr, A. Norouzi, M. Ghaemi
{"title":"Internal evaluation in the faculties affiliated to zanjan university of medical sciences: Quality assurance of medical science education based on institutional accreditation","authors":"A. Abdanipour, Farhad Ramezani-badr, A. Norouzi, M. Ghaemi","doi":"10.52547/edcj.15.46.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: Institutional accreditation is a type of quality assurance in medical education to achieve quality standards in higher education institutions. The present study aimed at internal evaluation of the faculties affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences based on the institutional accreditation standards. Materials & Methods: This study was conducted based on a descriptive cross-sectional design. The research samples included all the faculties affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. This study was performed based on the national institutional accreditation standards (IA), including 66 standards and 351 measures in eight evaluation domains, approved by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education. In order to conduct an internal evaluation based on institutional accreditation standards, the experts in the fields of institutional accreditation were initially provided with the necessary training. Upon the collection of documents, the data was evaluated by the research group based on the accreditation standards. In the next step, to confirm the documents and complete the internal evaluation, a field visit was conducted to the educational and research facilities of the faculties based on the accreditation standards. Finally, the faculty officials and senior managers of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences were provided with feedback on the results of the internal evaluation in the two sections of mandatory and developmental standards. Results: As evidenced by the obtained results, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences showed significant improvement in the achievement of accreditation standards in field evaluations. The highest and lowest percentages of compliance with the standards were observed in the faculties of nursing-midwifery and health- paramedicine, respectively. Conclusion: In order to reach an ideal level in all necessary standards and improve the quality of medical education, in addition to the provision of necessary infrastructure, managers, professors, and experts in the field of education need to be thoroughly familiar with institutional accreditation standards.","PeriodicalId":30594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/edcj.15.46.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objective: Institutional accreditation is a type of quality assurance in medical education to achieve quality standards in higher education institutions. The present study aimed at internal evaluation of the faculties affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences based on the institutional accreditation standards. Materials & Methods: This study was conducted based on a descriptive cross-sectional design. The research samples included all the faculties affiliated to Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. This study was performed based on the national institutional accreditation standards (IA), including 66 standards and 351 measures in eight evaluation domains, approved by the Ministry of Health and Medical Education. In order to conduct an internal evaluation based on institutional accreditation standards, the experts in the fields of institutional accreditation were initially provided with the necessary training. Upon the collection of documents, the data was evaluated by the research group based on the accreditation standards. In the next step, to confirm the documents and complete the internal evaluation, a field visit was conducted to the educational and research facilities of the faculties based on the accreditation standards. Finally, the faculty officials and senior managers of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences were provided with feedback on the results of the internal evaluation in the two sections of mandatory and developmental standards. Results: As evidenced by the obtained results, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences showed significant improvement in the achievement of accreditation standards in field evaluations. The highest and lowest percentages of compliance with the standards were observed in the faculties of nursing-midwifery and health- paramedicine, respectively. Conclusion: In order to reach an ideal level in all necessary standards and improve the quality of medical education, in addition to the provision of necessary infrastructure, managers, professors, and experts in the field of education need to be thoroughly familiar with institutional accreditation standards.
赞詹医科大学附属院系的内部评价:基于机构认证的医学教育质量保证
背景与目的:机构认证是医学教育质量保证的一种形式,旨在达到高等教育机构的质量标准。本研究旨在根据机构认证标准对赞詹医科大学附属学院进行内部评估。材料与方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计。研究样本包括赞詹医学科学大学附属的所有学院。这项研究是根据国家机构认证标准(IA)进行的,包括卫生和医学教育部批准的八个评估领域的66项标准和351项措施。为了根据机构认证标准进行内部评估,最初对机构认证领域的专家进行了必要的培训。在收集文件后,研究小组根据认证标准对数据进行了评估。下一步,为了确认文件并完成内部评估,根据认证标准对各学院的教育和研究设施进行了实地考察。最后,向赞詹医科大学的教职员工和高级管理人员提供了关于强制性标准和发展性标准两部分内部评估结果的反馈。结果:正如所获得的结果所证明的那样,赞詹医学科学大学在实地评估中的认证标准的实现情况有了显著改善。符合标准的比例最高和最低的分别是护理、助产和健康护理学院。结论:为了在所有必要的标准方面达到理想水平,提高医学教育质量,除了提供必要的基础设施外,教育领域的管理人员、教授和专家还需要彻底熟悉机构认证标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信