{"title":"‘You’ll be very far from this place’: Temporal and spatial aspirations at Bridge International Academies in Kenya","authors":"M. Kagan, Y. Gez","doi":"10.1177/0308275X211059661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The association between aspirations and education across the African continent is widely recognized. However, it is only in recent years that scholars began observing this connection in the context of the booming low-fee private schools (LFPS) sector. In this article, we consider the case of one of Kenya’s most prominent LFPS actors, a chain of primary schools called Bridge International Academies (BIA). Despite catering for a lower-class clientele, BIA bears ostensible markers of privilege, in the form of a veneer of internationality and intensive application of technology. Indeed, while BIA’s main promise relates to performance on the critical Kenyan Certificate Primary Education exam as a gateway to a better future, such promises are profoundly infused with ideas that appear disconnected from the harsh material conditions of the schools’ clients and staff. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in BIA schools in Nairobi focused on teachers and staff, we show the appeal of the language of internationalism to socio-economically marginalized Kenyans and consider its multiple interpretations within local imaginations.","PeriodicalId":46784,"journal":{"name":"Critique of Anthropology","volume":"41 1","pages":"389 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critique of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X211059661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The association between aspirations and education across the African continent is widely recognized. However, it is only in recent years that scholars began observing this connection in the context of the booming low-fee private schools (LFPS) sector. In this article, we consider the case of one of Kenya’s most prominent LFPS actors, a chain of primary schools called Bridge International Academies (BIA). Despite catering for a lower-class clientele, BIA bears ostensible markers of privilege, in the form of a veneer of internationality and intensive application of technology. Indeed, while BIA’s main promise relates to performance on the critical Kenyan Certificate Primary Education exam as a gateway to a better future, such promises are profoundly infused with ideas that appear disconnected from the harsh material conditions of the schools’ clients and staff. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in BIA schools in Nairobi focused on teachers and staff, we show the appeal of the language of internationalism to socio-economically marginalized Kenyans and consider its multiple interpretations within local imaginations.
在整个非洲大陆,抱负与教育之间的联系得到了广泛认可。然而,直到最近几年,学者们才开始在蓬勃发展的低收费私立学校(LFPS)行业的背景下观察到这种联系。在本文中,我们考虑肯尼亚最著名的LFPS参与者之一的案例,这是一家名为Bridge International Academies (BIA)的连锁小学。尽管BIA的服务对象是下层阶级的客户,但它以国际化和技术密集应用的形式,表现出了表面上的特权标志。事实上,虽然BIA的主要承诺与在关键的肯尼亚初级教育证书考试中的表现有关,作为通往更美好未来的门户,但这些承诺深刻地融入了与学校客户和员工的恶劣物质条件脱节的想法。通过对内罗毕BIA学校的教师和工作人员的民族志实地考察,我们展示了国际主义语言对社会经济边缘化的肯尼亚人的吸引力,并考虑了其在当地想象力中的多种解释。
期刊介绍:
Critique of Anthropology is dedicated to the development of anthropology as a discipline that subjects social reality to critical analysis. It publishes academic articles and other materials which contribute to an understanding of the determinants of the human condition, structures of social power, and the construction of ideologies in both contemporary and past human societies from a cross-cultural and socially critical standpoint. Non-sectarian, and embracing a diversity of theoretical and political viewpoints, COA is also committed to the principle that anthropologists cannot and should not seek to avoid taking positions on political and social questions.