LGBTQ Health and Well-Being in China: A Trend Analysis of English- and Chinese-Language Research, 2011–2018

Tao Lin, Yi-Kun Cheng, T. Hughes, C. Veldhuis
{"title":"LGBTQ Health and Well-Being in China: A Trend Analysis of English- and Chinese-Language Research, 2011–2018","authors":"Tao Lin, Yi-Kun Cheng, T. Hughes, C. Veldhuis","doi":"10.31234/OSF.IO/CMXQU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Research on LGBTQ populations has dramatically increased in both Western and non-Western countries over the past several decades. Attempts to synthesize this research have largely focused on studies conducted in the West. We conducted a review of LGBTQ research in China to elucidate trends and gaps in the literature and to provide a foundation for future research. Methods: We searched the literature to identify studies that focused on LGBTQ people in China using PsycINFO and reviews of article titles and abstracts in 15 English-language LGBTQ-specific journals published between 2011–2018. We used the Wanfang database to identify Chinese-language LGBTQ research articles published in any journal between 2011–2018. Each article was coded by topic, study type, province, and sample. Results: These searches yielded 798 LGBTQ research studies conducted in China between 2011–2018. HIV/AIDS, sexuality, and LGBTQ-specific issues (e.g., coming out) have been most frequently studied. Most of the articles focused on sexual minority men (69.5%), with smaller proportions focused on sexual minority women (15.5%) or transgender individuals (2.6%). The disparity wasreduced after excluding studies on HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. The geographic distribution of studies was uneven; most were conducted in economically developed areas. Conclusion: This study identified gaps and trends in LGBTQ research in China and highlighted priority and under-researched topics to guide future LGBTQ research. More research on these understudied populations and topics will contribute to understanding of LGBTQ populations.","PeriodicalId":72223,"journal":{"name":"Annals of LGBTQ public and population health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of LGBTQ public and population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/CMXQU","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Research on LGBTQ populations has dramatically increased in both Western and non-Western countries over the past several decades. Attempts to synthesize this research have largely focused on studies conducted in the West. We conducted a review of LGBTQ research in China to elucidate trends and gaps in the literature and to provide a foundation for future research. Methods: We searched the literature to identify studies that focused on LGBTQ people in China using PsycINFO and reviews of article titles and abstracts in 15 English-language LGBTQ-specific journals published between 2011–2018. We used the Wanfang database to identify Chinese-language LGBTQ research articles published in any journal between 2011–2018. Each article was coded by topic, study type, province, and sample. Results: These searches yielded 798 LGBTQ research studies conducted in China between 2011–2018. HIV/AIDS, sexuality, and LGBTQ-specific issues (e.g., coming out) have been most frequently studied. Most of the articles focused on sexual minority men (69.5%), with smaller proportions focused on sexual minority women (15.5%) or transgender individuals (2.6%). The disparity wasreduced after excluding studies on HIV or other sexually transmitted infections. The geographic distribution of studies was uneven; most were conducted in economically developed areas. Conclusion: This study identified gaps and trends in LGBTQ research in China and highlighted priority and under-researched topics to guide future LGBTQ research. More research on these understudied populations and topics will contribute to understanding of LGBTQ populations.
2011-2018年中国LGBTQ健康与福祉:中英文研究趋势分析
目的:在过去几十年里,西方和非西方国家对LGBTQ人群的研究急剧增加。综合这项研究的尝试主要集中在西方进行的研究上。我们对中国的LGBTQ研究进行了回顾,以阐明文献中的趋势和差距,并为未来的研究提供基础。方法:我们检索文献,使用PsycINFO以及对2011-2018年间发表的15种英语LGBTQ特定期刊的文章标题和摘要的评论,确定针对中国LGBTQ人群的研究。我们使用万方数据库来识别2011-2018年间发表在任何期刊上的中文LGBTQ研究文章。每篇文章都按主题、研究类型、省份和样本进行了编码。结果:这些搜索得出了2011年至2018年间在中国进行的798项LGBTQ研究。艾滋病毒/艾滋病、性行为和LGBTQ特定问题(如出柜)的研究频率最高。大多数文章关注的是性少数群体男性(69.5%),而关注性少数群体女性(15.5%)或变性人(2.6%)的文章比例较小。在排除了对艾滋病毒或其他性传播感染的研究后,这种差距缩小了。研究的地理分布不均衡;大多数是在经济发达地区进行的。结论:本研究确定了中国LGBTQ研究的差距和趋势,并强调了优先和研究不足的主题,以指导未来的LGBTQ的研究。对这些研究不足的人群和主题进行更多的研究将有助于了解LGBTQ人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信