Entre la educación estatal y la privada: el dilema ideológico del judeo-progresismo argentino (1955-1995).

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nerina Visacovsky
{"title":"Entre la educación estatal y la privada: el dilema ideológico del judeo-progresismo argentino (1955-1995).","authors":"Nerina Visacovsky","doi":"10.14516/ete.252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reconstructs a political-educational dilemma that plagued the progressive Argentine Jews of the Yiddisher Kultur Farband (YKUF), or Federation of Jewish Cultural Entities (from now on, «the Ykufists»), between 1955 and 1995. Ideologically close to the Communists, they defended the secular, gratuitous and compulsory education principles embodied in Law 1420 (1884), and the postulates of autonomy, co-government and freedom of University Reform (1918). In 1958, faced with the «secular or free» conflict, which polarized the citizenship between those who defended a private-confessional education and those who advocated the exclusiveness of a secular state education, the Ykufists actively demonstrated their affinity with the latter. Parallel to this, they supported a network of idiomatic schools in Yiddish (shules), founded by immigrants, which played a «complementary» role. These shules declined towards the 1960s. To save them, they had to be turned into full-time private schools, but that would go against their principles in favour of a public and egalitarian education. At the 9th YKUF Congress in 1968, delegates from all over the country voted to continue with the shules for as long as possible, but not to compete with the state school. However, two decades later, in the nineties, YKUF was happy for a private secular school to be opened in one of its institutions; what social and political transformations generated this change? How did they manage to reconcile a discourse in favour of state education and then green light a private school? Based on extensive research, this article analyses, in light of the national and international context, the educational dilemmas of this progressive Jewish group, which identified with the Argentine middle classes.","PeriodicalId":41950,"journal":{"name":"Espacio Tiempo y Educacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espacio Tiempo y Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article reconstructs a political-educational dilemma that plagued the progressive Argentine Jews of the Yiddisher Kultur Farband (YKUF), or Federation of Jewish Cultural Entities (from now on, «the Ykufists»), between 1955 and 1995. Ideologically close to the Communists, they defended the secular, gratuitous and compulsory education principles embodied in Law 1420 (1884), and the postulates of autonomy, co-government and freedom of University Reform (1918). In 1958, faced with the «secular or free» conflict, which polarized the citizenship between those who defended a private-confessional education and those who advocated the exclusiveness of a secular state education, the Ykufists actively demonstrated their affinity with the latter. Parallel to this, they supported a network of idiomatic schools in Yiddish (shules), founded by immigrants, which played a «complementary» role. These shules declined towards the 1960s. To save them, they had to be turned into full-time private schools, but that would go against their principles in favour of a public and egalitarian education. At the 9th YKUF Congress in 1968, delegates from all over the country voted to continue with the shules for as long as possible, but not to compete with the state school. However, two decades later, in the nineties, YKUF was happy for a private secular school to be opened in one of its institutions; what social and political transformations generated this change? How did they manage to reconcile a discourse in favour of state education and then green light a private school? Based on extensive research, this article analyses, in light of the national and international context, the educational dilemmas of this progressive Jewish group, which identified with the Argentine middle classes.
在国家和私人教育之间:犹太-阿根廷进步主义的意识形态困境(1955-1995年)。
本文重建了1955年至1995年间困扰犹太文化实体联合会(从现在起,“伊库菲派”)的进步阿根廷犹太人的政治教育困境。他们在意识形态上接近共产党,捍卫了第1420号法律(1884年)中体现的世俗、无偿和义务教育原则,以及自治、共治和大学改革自由的原则(1918年)。1958年,面对“世俗或自由”的冲突,捍卫私人忏悔教育的人和主张世俗国家教育排他性的人之间的公民身份两极分化,伊库菲派积极展示了他们与后者的亲和力。与此同时,他们支持由移民创建的意第绪语惯用语学校网络,该网络发挥了“互补”作用。这些舒尔在20世纪60年代逐渐衰落。为了拯救他们,他们不得不被转为全日制私立学校,但这将违背他们支持公共和平等教育的原则。在1968年的第九届YKUF大会上,来自全国各地的代表投票决定尽可能长时间地继续使用舒尔斯,但不与州立学校竞争。然而,20年后的90年代,YKUF很高兴在其一所机构开设了一所私立世俗学校;是什么社会和政治变革导致了这种变化?他们是如何调和支持公立教育的言论,然后为私立学校开绿灯的?本文在广泛研究的基础上,结合国内外背景,分析了这一认同阿根廷中产阶级的进步犹太群体的教育困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Espacio Tiempo y Educacion
Espacio Tiempo y Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信